Did you skip the first 20 pages of part 1!
No, but I did read it a long time ago. Back then, this was more variety!
Well, isnāt this something that youāre looking for in some of these more expensive wines - the ability to age? They should still be ādrinkableā young but should evolve over time, no?
Can you explain what you mean that improving with time is not going to happen? Curious to hear how youāve come up with this? Cheers
I havenāt bought in a long time but I am surprised at the enthusiasm for bulked NDA 2022 Napa Cabs. Without clear hints at the winery or pick dates, itās a much bigger gamble than the 18s or 19s previously offered.
I donāt taste anything that would ādevelopā over time
reminds me of some Walla Walla Cabernet over the years
the first bottle of a case is always my point of reference
been doing that long before dN
So no noticeable acidity? No noticeable tannins? Did you try some on Day 2 or even Day 3?
Just trying to understand
Cheers
Just to jump inā¦I bought 3 cases of Betz Cab recently for $18 per. Thatās a wine that when you pop it says I need time. Deep concentrating power with ample tannin that is hiding the depth in the wine.
Iāve had most every dN WA wine and I canāt think of one that Iāve felt like is hiding anything. They are plush and ready to drink for the most part imo.
dude, Iām not a taster
no acidity, no tannin, no oakā¦smooth
Iām a drinker
and I donāt think you are trying to understand LOL
I am trying to understand - thatās why Iām asking the questions.
Cheers
500 arrived about an hour ago. Cool to the touch. Unless I hear otherwise, Iām probably going to bury this in the cellar for a while.
Maybe itās because Iām politically brainwashed from getting my worldview from the woke media, but I donāt think pricing is really that much higher. I opened my first bottles of 200 and 241 yesterday and I feel like once you factor in the shipping that we paid back then, the discounts for those were no better than what we are seeing in whatever theyāre calling 496-500. The difference seems much more about the guesses we were able to make back then. I feel like with the free shipping and loyalty discounts the prices are āgoodā. I just feel like we might be buying the equivalent of wtsoās 80% off cabs that Iād never heard of that looked like they were bottled solely for the purpose of being marked down 80% on wtso. For those of you who havenāt tried them lately, 200 is amazing and ready to go with a good decant if you like opulent napa cabs. 241 is probably better in my opinion, but Iām giving my other bottles a couple more years to sleep.
definitely disappointed that your initial impressions of 497 were bad. Iām no taster either, so my solution is to just ignore all of these wines for years. The problem is storage comes a significant cost. Iāll hold out hope that 497 will do itās thing and come around, but youāre making me feel better for passing on 496 and 500.
Delicious wines may seem expensive in fiat currency.
Delicious wines may seem inexpensive ($1/bottle) using sound money.
So I should buy wine with my rare coins? All I know was all in lot 200 was not as good a discount as 497. Much worse if you factor in that Geodesy is discounted elsewhere regularly. It was still almost certainly a better deal.
I DO agree, the price is āgoodā. Iām still happy here. Points, etc.
Shopping around elsewhere, and not seeing as much value, these do seem like good values.
#200 is extra great & I look forward to #497. ![]()
BTW, Donāt sell your coins, unless you need the moneyā¦ā¦
Just a Different yardstick for measuringā¦ā¦
![]()
Oh yeah!
You buying this one?
Most likely not, just because I am so full and bought 4 of the others, but man it looks nice. Price is much better and the description sounds delicious, all that dark fruit and graphite. Plus you see they say ādirect from the wineries barrels.ā Could be a winner for the less full without the Napa ātax!ā
āProduced by a multigenerational Alexander Valley family producerā
I wonder who?
$199/case deliveredā¦Robert Young???
