That’s what I am looking at.
This is weird. The first time I looked this one up the consumed order was random. Now it is in order, earliest consumption first.
Mine are usually in order, esrliest first, but if you look at my picture above, there’s one out of order!
Not that it’s any help, but is it possible that it is sorting by the date the note was entered rather than the drink date? IOW if you entered a note some weeks or months after a bottle was consumed? I’ve done that on occasion when I find a set of misplaced handwritten notes.
Regardless, it would be useful to be able to select the sort order, like you can on the website.
No, it’s not. When I observed the order(no screenshot taken) of consumed it had a random order of items entered between 2012 and 2025.
Very strange.
I use the website on my iPad. On my phone, I am still 75% website.
The Wine-Searcher link for a wine brings up W-S, but defaults to “All Countries”. I’m always logged into W-S and when I open W-S separately it always defaults to my proper settings, which is California. (This is with Chrome on Windows, with the Android app it seems to behave as expected.)
Love the new Community average value feature! However, I’m seeing some odd behavior with the new valuation updates. I have it set to Default cascade behavior.
This wine shows $138 value in the summary.
But drilling down, that was one outlier auction price last year (which was probably actually for a larger format).
Nothing to do with anything new. Just a wayward auction SKU. Fixed.
editors@cellartracker.com please for all data errors like this.
I use the iPhone app exclusively for scanning out bottles and for moving bottles around within my cellar. I’m using it more for choosing wines to drink as well. While I’m sure there are things that could be better for some people, I love it.
1 Like
I see it as the last price in CAV as well (though maybe no longer . . .)
I am waiting for a CT drone that will zip around my cellar, visually identifying every bottle I have and doing a perfectly accurate inventory, reconciling it with the hideously, “hallucinatory” inventory currently in my CT account. That’s something AI can do, right?
2 Likes
What about passive RFID tags? I see rolls of these stickers for sale cheap. A quick Google claims range is 10 meters with an RFID reader. Seems like an obvious use case.
I’m not sure I follow.
I don’t scan barcodes but I do sometimes move bottles around and I constantly use CT to choose which bottle to drink. For those two tasks, I find the website on a tablet far superior to the app. But I may be missing some tricks. Any advice, or are you limited to using a phone?
Even on a phone, where the website defaults to an app-like appearance, I sometimes request the desktop version and enlarge the view. The functionality seems so much richer than in the app.
I think the idea is you would code a bunch of RFID tags/labels to your inventory, apply them to the relevant bottle, and then could just use the RFID reader to check the inventory on a regular basis.
Yes, but my lazy ass goal here is to have someone (or something) else do the initial inventory. When I began using CT, I already had decades of wine in the cellar that was never logged. I also have bottles that were never properly logged on receipt, and entries in CT for bottles that were actually drunk. It is a mess. I need to start fresh, but that means actual work, which (as should be obvious) isn’t likely to happen