I opened a 2012 this evening. Really quite delicious with a lot of complexity.
Initially (30-45 min decant) I thought it had a red fruit profile. After 1-1.5 hrs, that developed to chocolate and black fruit. Now stone is becoming more prominent. Very smooth with super fine grained tannins. An absolute steal of a deal from LB. What a treat!
I could see this smoothing out more in 3-5 years. Yet, I wouldn’t wait to drink it. Enjoy!
I have had two bottles of the 2012. I think it should be consumed NOW. I do not see any benefit to aging it more, unless your palate likes tertiary wines with muted tannins and little fruit. It is at a right stage in the present moment IMO. Interestingly to me, it tasted like it had hints of spice - like it would be a great holiday wine. I don’t know if anyone else picked that up or it’s just me.
I opened a 375ml of the 2007 last week. Double decanted off the sediment and poured into a large Bordeaux glass to let it breathe for an hour. Sipped it over about an hour after that, then poured a second glass, which I left on the counter for 8 hours.
So, 10 hours after the initial opening and double decant, I thought the 2007 was showing significantly better than after the first hour or two of air. The fruit emerged a bit from behind the prominent savory, earthy, forest floor notes to offer a more interesting and pleasing wine to my palate. There’s plenty of structure still, although the tannins aren’t formidable at this point.
I have a magnum of the 2007 too and, based on the 375ml, don’t plan to open it for at least a few more years. When I do, I’ll decant it for at least 8-10 hours if not longer.
I had the 2013 in a big lineup of wines with a bunch of friends this weekend. Decanted about two hours before serving.
I have only had the 2007 Elivette so far, so nothing to compare it to, but the 2013 was very good. No detailed notes (or any notes, really) but the fruit was there along with a lot of structure. Tasted expensive.
Going to get better? No idea.
A $100+ wine? Not to me.
Enjoyable to drink for $29? Absolutely. All my non-geek friends loved it.
I have two more of these, and won’t try to buy anymore, but if your bottle is sound, it’s a slam dunk at the closeout pricing.
My LB shipment arrived yesterday. Shipped right through the first polar vortex of the season. Can’t make that up. Luckily, most bottles look fine but a few seem to have the cork sitting slightly less deep than others. No real bulging, but still a bit concerned.
Most noticeable on the one 3L bottle but maybe they are like that? Anyone here have a 3L to compare:
I got a 2002 mag that had a slightly elevated cork and some trivial evidence of seepage, so not surprised. Consider yourself lucky if no seepage. But maybe the large formats ended up with cork bulge for one reason or another.
I’m no expert here, so maybe someone else with lots of large format or industry experience can comment, but I believe large format bottles use a larger cork resulting in more compression during closure and some amount of expansion happens no matter what, so on large format bottles, it’s more likely to see a couple mm of cork elevation than it is on small format bottling. Thinking if there’s no seepage, not a ton of elevation, it’s likely not an issue at all.
Had a 2006 Elivette out of a 375 bottle. Very depressed cork that crumbled into a trillion pieces. Strained into a decanter but sediment was rampant. Tasted very oxidized. Oh well. Still have 16 other 750 bottles to try.
Had both the 2011 and 2013 out of 750 recently. The 2011 was a good wine,but the 2013 was clearly a step up. Both brought by party guests; I forget which was which, but 1 was bought at original cost, 1 at a sale price this Autumn.