I haven’t had any of these producers before and am currently ‘studying’ Burgundy’s top producers. Which of these would offer the best value and the truest example of its producer’s style?
My vote would be to the Cathiard. Im a big 2019 Burgundy fan, and love the producer. But you can’t go too wrong with any of those. 2005s can have a ton of structure that all too often outlives all the fruit.
I wouldn’t choose any of those personally. This is a good example of low end bottlings that don’t really show the true character of the producer. Aside from the fact that Trapet in 05 was not nearly the same producer as now. And Dujac in 08 is a tough vintage/producer combination.
I think these are all good producers, in different styles, but agree w Andrew that I don’t think any of these would offer great value for money, or show off the best sides of the producers (for the reasons stated). If I were to choose I would probably opt for the Cathiard.
I would leave out the 2019. Too young to really show a producer’s style. I would pick either the Trapet or the Dujac. I probably would lean toward the Trapet as Petite Chapelle is an excellent premier cru vineyard.
If it’s a forced choice of those 3, I’d try the Cathiard. Ditto @Eric_Egan and @Andrew_K - same reasons. I think drinking an 05 Trapet would give you a misleading (and negative) view of that producer’s work today. My (much more limited) experience of Dujac in 08 aligns with Andrew’s, and I suspect that would be particularly true at villages level.
If trying to learn, then you should be using your $ to buy bottles that are considered more representative of the producer’s best terroir and current style. The wines and prices you cited aren’t that.
You live in the wine trading capital of the world, with so much wine in bonded storage and readily accessible to be pulled out of VAT. For example, Lay Wheeler quick search on Dujac: Search Results