2001 Altesino Montosoli, went heavy based on the hype from Wine Spectator. In the beginning so dry and tannic I though they had to get better. And a few did over time. As for the remaining dozen or do, at least 2/3 corked, simply awful and undrinkable. Just 1 left.
I agree with both sentiments. I think track record can be the best indication but itās difficult for wineries where theyāve made some changes to their winemaking in the past say 10 years.
Wish I saw these posts a few months ago. Over the summer I had a bottle in France at Maison Pic in N Rhone. It was off the charts, rich complex, alive and outright stunning. I bought a case over the winter and paid a premium for it from HDH. Although not dead, and only 2 bottles consumed so far they were nothing like the bottle I had in France.
Most disappointing: 1998 ChĆ¢teau-Grillet - Hands down couldnāt hold a candle to the hype. It was very good at best. Opened in 2011ā¦maybe too soon? Iām open to hearing from others that know more than I do about this producer.
Tasted in 2008, it was a light bodied, bright red & very high acid vinegar with tannins.
In restrospect, STās note is a more accurate, in terms of āredā and āfirm acidsā & āfirm tanninsā, but RMPās note is so badly off that I wonder whether he was served a fake sample, or maybe his notes got mixed up and he was mistakenly writing about an entirely different wine?
RMP: āReaders should keep an eye out for the 1998 Terra Rossa First Growth after its release later this year. Its dense purple color is followed by extraordinarily sweet fruit, intense glycerin, and a full-bodied, concentrated mouth-feel. The purity, high extract, and uncanny symmetry is breathtaking. Perhaps the finest Terra Rossa First Growth yet produced, it should drink well for two decades or more. 95-97ā
ST: āBright, full ruby. Brooding aromas of cassis, licorice, menthol and cocoa powder, plus a slight greenness. Then youthfully backward on the palate, with red fruit and spice flavors enlivened by firm acids. Shows good extract and a core of subtle sweetness. Finishes with firm tannins and very good but not outstanding length. Still rather dominated by its backbone today, and built to last. 89+ā
I have a lot of these 98 Beaucastels in halves, and they may be coming back. I agree that they were messes a few years ago, but the last 3-4 halves Iāve opened in the last year have been good.
Itās good to hear that some have had good experiences with Turley Petite Sirah. I have a few bottles from 2002-2005 that Iām just going to start trying nowā¦
This thread inspired me to open the 02 Turley Library Vyd. Note below:
Light red in color and a surprisingly low 13.8% ABV. Amazing nose of currants, leather and menthol. Medium body with gobs of acidity. The wine is somewhat lean compared to the Turley Zins of this era but still has great aged fruit flavors that are like a laser beam on the palate. Dried cherries, iron, mint and cassis in spades. Medium length on the finish. In retrospect, had I tasted this blind, Iād have likely guessed a twenty year old Barolo. Fascinating wine that I wish I had more of. Drink over the next decade. 95 points
I have found that many aged CA Petites lean towards older Clarets than they do younger Petites. The good ones seem to develop some very interesting nuances; the ones that ādonāt come aroundā sound similar to the one that Mel mentioned above.
Just because a wine has tons of tannins as a young wine does not necessarily mean that these will āresolveā over time. So many other factors come into play here that there truly is no way to know . . . and that is part of the fun that is wine to me.
I had a ridge 1981 York Creek Petite Sirah not too long ago and it was a beautiful wine, but definitely did not remind me much of a Petite Sirah. Is that a good or bad thing?