Agreed with Howard. Though my own opinion of Miller’s wine tasting credentials and Internet behaviour are very, very low, what’s the purpose of taking potshots at him here? Let’s all do more productive things, like drink wine that’s not Sierra Carche.
Howard
I am glad there is one person that thinks “highly” of Jay’s reporting and tasting ability. On a more serious note, he brought his lack of credibility on his own silly self.
L
For Bob to allow this (after that) is just reinforcement that the training wheels are falling off the tricycle over erobertparker.com. For Jay not to know better says that things are getting worse rather than better over there.
Ouch!
What is the over/under as to how long Jay remains part of the ebob staff?
Howard, I have no idea but my guess is that he has a very good palate. Bob had to have some reason to hire him. This doesn’t mean he has what it takes to be a professional critic. Work ethic seems to be lacking. It’s one thing to sit around a dinner table and opine on a dozen or more wines. As you know there is a bit more involved if you want to turn pro.
The ironic bit is that the way DrBigJay does tastings he has no real awareness of the packaging. Accordingly, he could be served a bag-in-a-box wine without knowing it, and presumably give it a 20 year drinking window if it was purple and concentrated.
As an example, see the review of 2006 Penfolds Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet, which he gives a drinking window out to 2022. The wine might have the stuffing, but it’s unlikely that the synthetic cork stopping-up the wine will hold up long-enough to support that…
And he is getting bashed over on Parker’s board right now…I guess he did not even know that this wine has been around for years. Trapiche apparently did not chip in for his free trips to Argentina, so why would he bother tasting their wines.
I don’t really care whether you agree with him or not. I generally don’t read much of what he publishes in the Wine Advocate because I often disagree with his notes. But the bashing of him here seems to take on a personal nature that I don’t see with any other critic (or other person). Unless he is an evil human being, I think the language could focus more on what he has said wrong rather than the glee that some people see in bashing him.
Let us say he does not have what it takes to be a wine critic. Is that a reason to make personal attacks?
The guy has no business making comments such as these. He isn’t in the business, per his own words, yet he gets emails directly from distributors/importers…what gives? He makes claims that are patently false.
I have never met him and don’t know him as a person…just his online persona of not doing his DD to be taken seriously anymore.