Just checked the label against a 1993 domaine I recently drunk (red capsule) and it is 100pc Identical.
Gérard is also obviously right: if it says « domaine » or « propriétaire » on the label it legally cannot be bought in grapes. Remember the issues Ray Walker had with the « douanes »? They’re notoriously diligent on those points. Domaine and maison wine, for example, can’t ever be in the same location whether it be for elevate or bottling.
I don´t know.
I also don´t know the legal agreements between the (probable) owner and Ponsot.
What we see in the pic is actually (legally) the back label … all the legal information (750 ml, alc. etc.) is on the other (smaller) label on the other side … it would be interesting if there is anything written like:
“Mis en bouteille au Domaine” or “…a la proprieté”. I don´t think so.
I´m also not totally sure if everything is really ok …
There is a producer who first only produced Domaine-wines.
Labels read: Mis en bouteille a la proprieté - Domaine XYZ
Then he got a negociant license for a few purchased wines.
Instead of using different labels for Domaine and negoce-wines he changed all labels to
Mis en bouteille e distribué par XYZ (no Domaine, only the name).
You have to know if a wine is from own vineyards or purchased juice, no difference on the labels.
Are these produced under a metayage arrangement, where Ponsot farms the vineyard and gets a proportion (typically half, I think) of the fruit? If so, perhaps that qualifies the wine for “domaine” labeling because it’s, in effect, a lease and the winemaker controls the vineyard.
If it is a metayage (lease against half of the crop) or a fermage (lease against money) the vineyard becomes part of the Domaine for the running time of the agreement … then “Domaine” is correct …
I don´t think Ponsot makes the Montrachet for a long time, maybe for 4 or 5 vintages … and the Corton not for much longer - certainly not for 10 years … no surprise it´s not in Morris´book (released 2010).
I meant there was nothing in the Morris book about what can be labeled as “domaine” wine, not that he didn’t address Ponsot in particular. I couldn’t find any definition in the Larousse encyclopedia of French wine, either.