04`,08`,09`Cristal, 06, 07` Taittinger Comtes, 07` Taittinger Comtes Rose, 3 fine reds

Our dinner group enjoyed another fine evening, this time at one of our favs, bouchon. Our wine theme was one we’ve talked about doing for a long time, vintage Krug, Taittinger Comtes de Champagne and Cristal.

On most occasions, any one bottle of any of these can easily stand out on its own and shine, but now we have the opportunity to compare them side by side and there was no doubt as to the one that was the clear winner.

To embellish the experience, I took 3 Sophienwald Grand Cru champagne stems as I’m so spoiled by the amazing enhancement this glass provides to all things bubbly.

Although we did not have a Krug, we did have 6 champagnes and 3 nice reds and the 5 of us ate and drank extremely well while sitting on a semi secluded upstairs balcony. Here` the wines in the order poured:

2009 LOUIS ROEDERER CRISTAL BRUT- I’ve had many bottles of this pubescent beauty which was released ahead of the 08` and for good reason, it is showing beautifully now with all of the stuffing to eventually position this in the top echelon of classic Cristal IMHO; with bright acidity and mouthwatering citrus fruit, especially spicy lemon zest ,kiwi and lime, it glides over the palate with a creamy texture that carries all of the goodies to the back end and then hangs around for a grand finish; even at this early stage, it has nice balance, elegance and charm and is so approachable, to a fault in my case; the back label code informs us it was made of 60% Pinot Noir and 40% Chardonnay and bottled in 2010, disgorged November 2017 @ 8 gpl with no ML

B5DB0DE5-71DA-479E-A32D-6A48FAFD63C6_1_201_a.jpeg
2008 LOUIS ROEDERER CRISTAL BRUT- First, I did not take this one; for those who might remember from past notes, I’ve been scolded numerous times for opening up way too many before their time { on this night, I brought the 09 and the 07 Comtes Rose}; the 08 has been considered by many to be the star of the 2000s for Cristal and possibly one of the all-time potential greats, this is just now starting to deliver the goods as it eases into more expressive notes and is getting richer with more body and layered complexity; as with previous bottles, it especially gave generous amounts of honeyed and ginger laced lemon oil; the assemblage is 60% Pinot Noir and 40% Chardonnay, but the latter seems to be more prevalent in the taste profile as orange peel and lime also join in as well as some golden delicious apples, strawberry and white peach. Outstanding. Back label code tells us it was made of 60% Pinot Noir and 40% Chardonnay, bottled in 09, disgorged in 2018 and 20% ML.

68AB73E5-EA86-4BEB-B397-4919DCB39474_1_201_a.jpeg
2004 LOUIS ROEDERER CRISTAL BRUT- my goodness, the 04 has really matured nicely and the consensus was it was the best of the 3 Cristal- who would have thunk that? It had honeyed peach, apricot, mango, citrus and pear fruit with a nice streak of brioche all the way through; it was full bodied with a creamy mousse and layered complexity; the key word here is maturity as this shows how much more of everything is gained with more time. Note to Self: hold off on opening the 08 and 09 for a few. The real question is, can Self obey? No back label code in 04.

1AF2E066-5774-4A51-A29B-E86A4229B215_1_201_a.jpeg
2006 TAITTINGER COMTES de CHAMPAGNE BLANC de BLANC- with close to 40 bottles consumed, each additional one just seems to remind me of how incredible this bubbly is as evidenced by the oohs and aahs around the table after the first sip; the first thing I got was the toasty brioche in the nose that provided the major accent to the taste profile, but it’s the whole package that gets your attention as it remains in perfect balance while delivering notes that stimulate all of the sensory preceptors to the max; more specifically, the brioche is joined by generous amounts of spicy citrus fruit with lemon and lime most prevalent and now some stone fruit is coming in; it also had a creamy, rich and luscious mousse which gave rise to its incredible mouthfeel; it was perhaps a touch more evolved than I can remember any previous bottle and still a long ways away from its apogee. At this moment, I`m thinking that this is so much more enjoyable than the 3 Cristal before it and I loved al 3. Will it be the WOTN?

BE38EF02-60DA-4C06-B159-E1A7D48C7623_1_201_a.jpeg
2007 TAITTINGER COMTES de CHAMPAGNE BLANC de BLANC- many of us have had the 06 and other vintages of this marvelous champagne, but few have had the 07 which has not received a lot of love from Comtes followers; I’ve liked every bottle and although this one was not up to the previous ones, it had very enjoyable citrus notes with a touch of slightly toasted brioche and spice being delivered in a creamy mousse; it was not nearly as rich nor full bodied as the 06`, but its bright acidity, taste profile and texture all serve to please and still allow for this to be a quality bubbly.

B7181B70-4007-4CD1-A015-7123F0AC3E6B_1_201_a.jpeg
2007 TAITTINGER COMTES de CHAMPAGNE BRUT ROSE- 70% Pinot Noir, 30% Chardonnay; this is the 5th bottle I’ve had of these and loved every bottle; the notes have been very consistent as each has had a bounty of fresh red fruit with brioche laden red cherry being most prevalent; it’s creamy and rich and full bodied and yet has magnificent finesse and elegance. As I’ve stated before, this is essentially a “glass” bowl full of whipped cream and cherries. It is the perfect forerunner to moving on to a fruity red Burgundy or hearty Pinot Noir, even a fruity Nebbiolo. Coming up.

46F551AE-7BCD-4505-8B69-1CD3E6C9D059_1_201_a.jpeg
2015 PRODUTTORI del BARBARESCO MONTEFICO RISERVA- this was really fruit forward with lots of fresh and ripe red cherry/ berry and black raspberry most noticeable from the aromatics on; there’s an earthy character plus a touch of eucalyptus that provides nice accents to this full bodied yet easy on the palate Nebbiolo; there’s serious structure here and a long, satisfying life span is ensured.

E1836633-7E7A-4A61-A10A-9AF4A00B0F51_1_201_a.jpeg
1990 DOMAINE LOUIS LATOUR ALOXE-CORTON- from the stellar 1990 vintage comes a mature red Burg that offered some pleasurable nuances with its spicy, wild, briary and dried red fruit notes that on the palate was cranberry, red cherry and plum; it was medium to full bodied and ended with another strong hit of dried red fruit.


6E356D40-F6D6-492C-BF96-F8D11FEE1903_1_201_a.jpeg
2005 DOMAINE ARLAUD CHARMES-CHAMBERTIN GRAND CRU- this most certainly could have qualified for the WOTN even with our primary champagne theme; it was stupendous with a super smooth texture, incredible richness and a full body with layers of depth and complexity; the ripe red fruit notes were dominated by red and black raspberry, red cherry and plum with some undertones of earth and leather; it was nicely balanced and just exuded class.

987E80F8-432D-4608-B068-15A59F6B8184_1_201_a.jpeg
So, when it came time to vote for the WOTN, it was unanimous- 2006 Taittinger Comtes de Champagne. I don’t know about on a global basis, but in our little nook of Santa Barbara, this is the world champion of current bubbly.

Cheers,
Blake

Great notes. Thanks a lot.

It was a fun night Howard. Two nights later, my wife and I finished off the 08 and 09 Cristal and they were both outstanding, even better than 2 nights prior and still not up to the 06` Comtes which just hits it on the highest level for my palate.

Group: How Many Cristal & Comtes should we open this evening?

Blake (raises hand confidently):




*Also, don’t think I didn’t scroll all the way down to those Burgs and think about a juicy Pork Chop and pan-fried buttered herbs. Woof, my friend. Woof. Your Fall drinking has been en pointe

It’s getting so I look forward to posting notes so I can read your responses Nick. Right on my friend.

What a sensational group of wines Blake (although in comparison to all the champagnes that barbaresco seems a little monochromatic). Thanks for the notes

Wow. That is a Champagne lover’s dream night! Very cool notes from what looks like a magical night. Thanks for sharing.

champagne.gif champagne.gif champagne.gif champagne.gif

Interesting notes. I feel like my recent impressions of these champagnes are very much the opposite in many cases.

Of the Blancs I would rank them 08 cristal = 09 cristal > 06 cdc > 07 cdc > 04 cristal. I think 08 will eventually be better than the 09, but they’re both fantastic.

I’ve always found the 06 cdc to be good but nothing special, which is why I have no urgency in stocking up on the 08.

I have to admit, had I ranked them ahead of the tasting, I would have gone with the 08 Cristal, then the 09 and then the 06 Comtes, 04Cristal, 07 Comtes. I along with the others were surprised at how much the 06 Comtes just took it to another level, at least for our palates, and a couple of these guys drink these as much or perhaps more than I do. I`ve loved it from the get go and it certainly checks off all of the boxes for me, but to put it up against 3 great Cristals, I just did not think it would be the clear #1 choice.

I drank the remainder of the 09 and 08 last night and they were even better than 2 nights before, Fantastic Plus, and still not up to the 06` Comtes.

I own some of the 2007 CdC, but the only time I tasted it was at the winery in 2018. It did not have the complexity of the 2006, but I liked the wine a good bit. It had a very pure flavor and bright acidity (as you said) and I think it has room to improve with time. Give it a few years and it will surprise a lot of people. So, Blake, as is often the case with Champagne, I agree with you.

So Blake, It seems to be a common theme with all of the Cristal and Comtes wines that they are young and will improve with time. In your view when will these Champagnes be at or near peak??

Interesting, every time i’ve done comparative tastings with the 06 comtes it’s been pedestrian, workmanlike, fine, but nowhere near the heights of 08/09 Cristal and 08 Dom.

Worth mentioning that ‘06 CdC has greater bottle variation than the others.

Matching pallets I suppose Howard. It’s so obvious to most of us that our preferences on any given night {or day} depends upon many factors including our emotional state, who we are drinking with, what we are eating, the occasion, etc. I do have to say that for me, the 06` Comtes has stood the test of many trials and consistently delivered regardless of all of the contributing factors.

The true test is when we taste these blind. Even then, the 06` Comtes has shined above and beyond.

I was under the impression that it is disgorgement variation, but of course that would also be bottle variation.

That`s not been my experience Mark. In fact, I’ve marveled over the fact that it has been consistently showing well with similar traits since release. And that comes from having sourced it from many different places and over time as well as consuming many bottles brought by others and not knowing any of the details of provenance.
I hope your future bottles have some semblance of continuity as it now progresses into the next phase of maturation.

Blake, I’d say 10% or so (4-5 bottles) of the '06 CdC I’ve tasted have seemed flabby and a bit sweet. I recall from reading the various threads about CdC here that others have had sub-par bottles, too. Given the young age of the wine, I assume it is batch variation. My friends have had similar experiences. I bought from 4 different retailers at 4 different times and don’t keep records detailing which bottles I’ve consumed were from whom, so I can’t say whether there is variation in a case or not. And there has been variation in bottles tasted that weren’t mine. But I’ve definitely experienced bottle/batch variation.

Thanks Mark for the feedback. It’s interesting to know what others have experienced and most certainly, you and others have found variations. The surprising thing to me is that has not been the case for me and the wine groups I’m involved locally and over time, so it was not even been a consideration. Fortunately, flabby has never been an option for using descriptors in my notes. I don’t ever recall sweetness as being an issue and I’m one who prefers Extra Brut and Brut Nature.

If you`re ever in the Santa Barbara area, I’d love to open up one with you and who knows, maybe it will be flabby and sweet, but I’m willing to give it a try.

Cheers

I’ve been thinking on this Michael. It would be interesting to taste however many different disgorgements have been done side by side. In fact, I don’t know how many they’ve made.

I’ve had such little vacation from all of the bottles I’ve tasted, I could not detect any real discernible differences and if I did, I’m not sure whetter I could sort out the other influences of the time, place, food pairing, my mood, etc.

Blake,

I purchasd two six packs at the same time and the bottles I’ve drunk so far have been great. So my comment was based on what I have read, not on personal experience.