I am very sure that among wine aficionados here in Europe the preferred age of Barolo/Barbaresco is beyond 15-20 years
You simply miss to much by drinking them younger
Maybe you enjoy the fruitiness & youthful vibrance of younger wines. Maybe you’re aging the wrong wines? I tend to not care for aged Zinfandel, it’s fine, and it’s aged…but there isn’t the same transformation that I find in say…Pinot Noir or Gamay. I tend to like Chateauneuf du Pape within 2-3 years of release & then again 20+ years later, but not in between. Figuring out what you like & in what age-range you like certain wines, should help you build a cellar that has a range of differing styles of wines for you.
Certainly I agree that the most important factor in wine age preference is your own palate. And that requires lots of testing tasting and note taking to figure out what you really like. Early in my wine journey I bought things I liked with a a wide variety of age (yay K&L and Winebid for the onesy-twosy aged wine auctions). This damned wine thing is complicated!
I do like aged wine. Most consistent for me is Bordeaux: 20 - 25 years is where they really start to bloom into something magnificent for my palate. I’m still buying 1985/6/9/90/96 and mostly drink them up. Two bottles of 1989 Clerc Milon on K&L (current bid $145 for the lot) today are calling out to me. Certainly not a ‘top’ wine but solid, reliable, utterly enjoyable. Must … resist …
Most Barolo (and Barbaresco more so) are rough very young, so seem to start to crank open in the 15-20 year range. But very vintage and producer dependent. Tasting through ‘16s I found the Vajra Albe and Fi. Alessandria Barolo Classico to be deeply enjoyable now, though a bit tannic. Probably will let them sleep though. I would and do open any Barolo before 2006 now, except perhaps my teensy handful of Monfortinos. Other than 1999/2004 I doubt any of them will improve a vast amount over the coming decades.
Red Burgundy is a delight young and I am opening more and more within a year or two of release. Yes they also age beautifully (again vintage and producer dependent) so I’m also sitting on most of mine. White Burgundy I drink within 10 years of vintage, Bourgogne Blancs within a year or two of release. German Riesling is super interesting because I mostly drink them very young - less than 5 years old. I’ve enjoyed some older ones, up to maybe 30 years old, but haven’t had an aged Riesling epiphany. Opened a 1996 JJ Prum Wehlener Sonnenuhr Auslese GK with a 2016 of the same wine just last week. They were remarkably similar. I will continue to experiment but this is a place where really experienced tasters have found something my caveman palate hasn’t seen (yet).
California is complicated. Give me lots of 20+ year old Dunn and Ridge Monte Bello. Most Cab I drink in the 5-15 year range. Pinot the same. I like Cali Zinfandel and drink it up within a year or three of release .
My point is - there’s no simple right or wrong answer. I’ve learned some things about my palate and look forward to lots of future study.
I totally agree. More often than not what develops in a wine with age are all the things I don’t enjoy as much. For each year they march ever so slightly more towards the Amarone/Marsala/raisin-world and I keep missing the freshness and vivacity. Yes, tannins do sometimes need time to integrate and soften, but if it’s not happened after a few years, then I find they probably won’t resolve that much anyway. Now, this is mainly for CA wines, I don’t have enough experience with European wines and they might behave differently.
Should a well made wine need age to become drinkable?
2015 Bartolo Mascarello was fantastic when i opened a bottle last month. 2013 Produttori Rabaja however was acidic and tannic earlier this year.
2018 Ridge Geyserville is awesome and i’d open a bottle anytime without hesitation. A bunch of 2018 Bedrocks i’ve had were coarse and tannic in comparison.
Seems to me that it has as much to do with producer as it does variety.
“I truly enjoy opening an old wine and finding it exceeds my expectations but these experiences are too few and far between to make me want to age my entire collection. I’m not alone right?”
I don’t think anyone really ever says to age your entire collection. I don’t even think Francois Audouze would endorse that idea.
I think nearly all of us would agree that the decision to age wines depends on your personal tastes, and the producers, vintages, vineyards, varieties and styles in question on a case-by-case basis. Understanding that even then, there are going to misses of varying degrees (opened this too young, opened that too late), just because the effects of aging are not knowable with exactness, bottles and storage vary, and ultimately how subjective it is whether the changes in an aged bottle are better, worse, or just different.
It’s challenging, and it can be frustrating at times, but this is also one of the reasons wine is so endlessly fascinating. Every experience can be different. Even the same wine is different from vintage to vintage, at different ages, with different amounts of air, in different contexts, paired with different foods. In the modern parlance, this is not a bug, it’s a feature.