No, my comment was about CLB’s style particularly.
I’ll try to make myself more clear. I do not doubt there are people in Finland and other places that drink very old nebbiolos. My point was that in the United States, my experience in the wine community is a very significant preference for nebbiolo with massive amounts of age on it. Festa di Barolo, for instance, has almost everyone (except for the producers, interestingly) bring extremely old bottles. That is not, for example, how Paulee works - some old, some young. My European friends simply do not place any kind of similar premium on this amount of age in their nebbiolo. That does not mean they don’t ALSO drink some older nebbiolo. I hope that made it clearer.
Drink what you like when you think it tastes the best to you, regardless of what others think.
It would be interesting to hear from winemakers on this topic. Do they intentionally make some/all of their wines to age to target a peak time window (recognizing this will be vintage dependent as well) or is it more “they are ready to drink when I release/two years post release and they will continue to age but not necessarily get better (better being subjective) after that”?
FWIW, I know from visiting and talking in 2018 that Aldo Vacca (who runs Produttori del Barbaresco) thinks their wines are ready to drink much sooner than the denizens of the wine web.
Whoa…how very cool to have met him. My all time favorite Barbaresco is from Produttori, the Rabaja Riserva…the last vintage I bought was from 2000. The last bottle of the case I had was drunk in 2011 and it was just as lively as I remembered all the rest. I’m definitely a fan of aging my wines. I’ve only had 1 fall flat on it’s face, a single vineyard Cab from Berenger. But like the OP, I’ve had a few that were on the downhill side of things. But thankfully, most of my patience has been rewarded. Smoother, more supple tannins being among the most noticeable traits I enjoy in aged wine. But agree with many others here, some wines are better for aging than others.
Did Mr. Vacca say what the ‘sweet spot’ was for drinking Produttori offerings? I’m sure there’s a lot of variables being they are a co-op of sorts.
Drink what you like when you think it tastes the best to you, regardless of what others think.
It would be interesting to hear from winemakers on this topic. Do they intentionally make some/all of their wines to age to target a peak time window (recognizing this will be vintage dependent as well) or is it more “they are ready to drink when I release/two years post release and they will continue to age but not necessarily get better (better being subjective) after that”?
FWIW, I know from visiting and talking in 2018 that Aldo Vacca (who runs Produttori del Barbaresco) thinks their wines are ready to drink much sooner than the denizens of the wine web.
Whoa…how very cool to have met him. My all time favorite Barbaresco is from Produttori, the Rabaja Riserva…the last vintage I bought was from 2000. The last bottle of the case I had was drunk in 2011 and it was just as lively as I remembered all the rest. I’m definitely a fan of aging my wines. I’ve only had 1 fall flat on it’s face, a single vineyard Cab from Berenger. But like the OP, I’ve had a few that were on the downhill side of things. But thankfully, most of my patience has been rewarded. Smoother, more supple tannins being among the most noticeable traits I enjoy in aged wine. But agree with many others here, some wines are better for aging than others.
Did Mr. Vacca say what the ‘sweet spot’ was for drinking Produttori offerings? I’m sure there’s a lot of variables being they are a co-op of sorts.
It’s very vintage dependent. He said that he prefer most of the wines 7-10 years from the vintage, but more structured years (e.g. 2008, 2013) could be 10+.
Drink what you like when you think it tastes the best to you, regardless of what others think.
It would be interesting to hear from winemakers on this topic. Do they intentionally make some/all of their wines to age to target a peak time window (recognizing this will be vintage dependent as well) or is it more “they are ready to drink when I release/two years post release and they will continue to age but not necessarily get better (better being subjective) after that”?
FWIW, I know from visiting and talking in 2018 that Aldo Vacca (who runs Produttori del Barbaresco) thinks their wines are ready to drink much sooner than the denizens of the wine web.
Whoa…how very cool to have met him. My all time favorite Barbaresco is from Produttori, the Rabaja Riserva…the last vintage I bought was from 2000. The last bottle of the case I had was drunk in 2011 and it was just as lively as I remembered all the rest. I’m definitely a fan of aging my wines. I’ve only had 1 fall flat on it’s face, a single vineyard Cab from Berenger. But like the OP, I’ve had a few that were on the downhill side of things. But thankfully, most of my patience has been rewarded. Smoother, more supple tannins being among the most noticeable traits I enjoy in aged wine. But agree with many others here, some wines are better for aging than others.
Did Mr. Vacca say what the ‘sweet spot’ was for drinking Produttori offerings? I’m sure there’s a lot of variables being they are a co-op of sorts.
Yes, he recommends them at year 8 to a max of 20 if I remember right from the Levi Dalton podcast. It’s all personal preference. I had a 1999 Rabaja over the holidays that was spectacular and likely would improve, subject to one’s preference.
As for the OP, I agree that there is this groupthink/waiting for magic/everything must be aged mentality out there. I happen to like wines that are very youthful and very aged, so it’s almost never an issue for me, but if you don’t like older wines then just drink them young. It’s no crime to go against the “all Bedrocks need at least 5 years of age” thinkers.
I agree with the rest of your post, other than that I’m not really sure there is some strong “groupthink” about aging new world wines. Most people around here seem to drink them younger, and when the topic of aging new world - and particularly California - wines comes up around here, all or most of the disdain is directed at the idea that they are worth aging.
Could anyone show me a few WB threads where there is strong groupthink or consensus in favor of aging California wines? If much of this thread is about reacting to groupthink, we might pause first and see if that even exists.
Chris, I would think it totally depends on the winery and style of wine. If someone said that an Edmunds St. John, Eyrie, Tablas Creek, Swan, Dunn, Mayacamas, etc. should be aged, I don’t think you’d get any disdain at all. Those are wineries that have made more traditionally-styled, balanced wines and there is considerable evidence that they not only last, but truly develop in the cellar. But a lot of the big, higher alcohol, higher new oak wines from the '90s and beyond are a different story. I thought they were grotesque at the time, and have never felt that they would age very well at all. The few I’ve tried since haven’t changed my mind, either.
Some wines don’t need age, and while there are wines I enjoy (especially many whites and roses) that might age nicely, some are so fun and exuberant in their youth that I’d rather drink them for that them see if they can hold on or develop more. Not every wine has to be put away for 10-20 years, and if you, or anyone, likes them at a younger age, drink them then. Even if “conventional wisdom” says otherwise. 
As for the OP, I agree that there is this groupthink/waiting for magic/everything must be aged mentality out there. I happen to like wines that are very youthful and very aged, so it’s almost never an issue for me, but if you don’t like older wines then just drink them young. It’s no crime to go against the “all Bedrocks need at least 5 years of age” thinkers.
I agree with the rest of your post, other than that I’m not really sure there is some strong “groupthink” about aging new world wines. Most people around here seem to drink them younger, and when the topic of aging new world - and particularly California - wines comes up around here, all or most of the disdain is directed at the idea that they are worth aging.
Could anyone show me a few WB threads where there is strong groupthink or consensus in favor of aging California wines? If much of this thread is about reacting to groupthink, we might pause first and see if that even exists.
Chris, I would think it totally depends on the winery and style of wine. If someone said that an Edmunds St. John, Eyrie, Tablas Creek, Swan, Dunn, Mayacamas, etc. should be aged, I don’t think you’d get any disdain at all. Those are wineries that have made more traditionally-styled, balanced wines and there is considerable evidence that they not only last, but truly develop in the cellar. But a lot of the big, higher alcohol, higher new oak wines from the '90s and beyond are a different story. I thought they were grotesque at the time, and have never felt that they would age very well at all. The few I’ve tried since haven’t changed my mind, either.
Some wines don’t need age, and while there are wines I enjoy (especially many whites and roses) that might age nicely, some are so fun and exuberant in their youth that I’d rather drink them for that them see if they can hold on or develop more. Not every wine has to be put away for 10-20 years, and if you, or anyone, likes them at a younger age, drink them then. Even if “conventional wisdom” says otherwise.
Good advice +1
There are plenty of Cali wines that age beautifully. One of my favorite wines on earth, despite being a bit of a Europhile when it comes to wine, is Togni’s cab. It ages wonderfully.
I had this thought last night as I was loading a few shipments into the cellar.
Did I drink them too young? Did I miss the youth window and now they’ll be in a shut down phase? Or, will I wait too long?
I think I’m coming around to the screw it, just drink it and stop having FOMO about how great it could’ve been camp. Plus, I’m running out of storage and if I don’t start drinking I can’t buy more!
I’m now there too! Gotta drink because storage is almost gone…
FWIW, I know from visiting and talking in 2018 that Aldo Vacca (who runs Produttori del Barbaresco) thinks their wines are ready to drink much sooner than the denizens of the wine web.
Whoa…how very cool to have met him. My all time favorite Barbaresco is from Produttori, the Rabaja Riserva…the last vintage I bought was from 2000. The last bottle of the case I had was drunk in 2011 and it was just as lively as I remembered all the rest. I’m definitely a fan of aging my wines. I’ve only had 1 fall flat on it’s face, a single vineyard Cab from Berenger. But like the OP, I’ve had a few that were on the downhill side of things. But thankfully, most of my patience has been rewarded. Smoother, more supple tannins being among the most noticeable traits I enjoy in aged wine. But agree with many others here, some wines are better for aging than others.
Did Mr. Vacca say what the ‘sweet spot’ was for drinking Produttori offerings? I’m sure there’s a lot of variables being they are a co-op of sorts.
Yes, he recommends them at year 8 to a max of 20 if I remember right from the Levi Dalton podcast. It’s all personal preference. I had a 1999 Rabaja over the holidays that was spectacular and likely would improve, subject to one’s preference.
How I wish I had more of the 2000…I was just learning about Italian vino back then. Such beautiful wines. I will try and find that podcast.
The Aldo Vacca interview is one of his better podcasts.
Sometimes I wonder why I sit on all this wine waiting for it to magically transform into some awesome elixir. This weekend I opened a 2011 Bedrock Papera Ranch Zinfandel that had transformed into something that I didn’t enjoy as much as I did the last time I opened one. I mean, it was good and all but it was way better when it was younger. What am I waiting for?
B70B7661-6E5B-4B83-88C8-CA24EDF93151.jpeg
Last night I popped a 1993 Ravenswood Sonoma County Merlot that had the ultimate provenance. It was well beyond its prime and unimpressive for me. I’ll have to open a few more from my mixed case before passing judgement but my experience with other 30 year old Ravenswoods, or other producers for that matter, have been similar and I chocked it up to provenance. Interesting but not satisfying enough to keep me engaged. Just not what I’m looking for in a wine. The Bedrock from the previous evening, while not at that point, was on its way to moving in that direction.
D411E498-1FB8-4967-9507-5B1FB2563B59.jpeg
I’ve had other aged wines that have shown fresh and lively so I know it’s possible and maybe I just had a poor run or perhaps that’s just not what I enjoy. So I ask, what am I waiting for sitting on wines that are “not ready yet” when they may well be ready? Or worse, in decline. I know there are exceptions but not for the wines I have always enjoyed in their youth. I find myself opening the cellar and having a hard time choosing a wine when there are 700+ possible choices staring me in the face.Tonight I instead told myself to grab the first ‘16 or ‘17 I read on a cork. I opened a 2016 The Bedrock Heritage that is lovely and I think, the heck with all of the wine geeks who think these aren’t ready. Let them wait for the fruit and liveliness to drain out of their wines. I’m going back to being a cork puller. Wine was way more fun back then.
E186656C-430E-4F14-8397-A0947A9BEF8B.jpeg
I truly enjoy opening an old wine and finding it exceeds my expectations but these experiences are too few and far between to make me want to age my entire collection. I’m not alone right?
Dammit Brian, until you tuited this diatribe, I was haiku aging my shit. So you forced me to crack a 2018 Bedrock, damn this is good shit…
Haha, but better in 3-5!
Wtf, how does Siri change “happy” to “haiku”!?
Bedrock is better young
Bedrock is complex with age
Tuite is often wrong
PS. If it ain’t obvious already, I may have accidentally consumed this bottle already.
Wtf, how does Siri change “happy” to “haiku”!?
Bedrock is better young
Bedrock is complex with age
Tuite is often wrongPS. If it ain’t obvious already, I may have accidentally consumed this bottle already.
Haiku Aging My Shit needs to be burned onto a reclaimed piece of wood and hung in the Mud Room next to the Golden Foyer…
Wtf, how does Siri change “happy” to “haiku”!?
Bedrock is better young
Bedrock is complex with age
Tuite is often wrongPS. If it ain’t obvious already, I may have accidentally consumed this bottle already.
When you’ve drank the whole bottle Siri doesn’t understand your slurred speech quite as well. Or, at least that’s what my wife says.
Wtf, how does Siri change “happy” to “haiku”!?
Bedrock is better young
Bedrock is complex with age
Tuite is often wrongPS. If it ain’t obvious already, I may have accidentally consumed this bottle already.
When you’ve drank the whole bottle Siri doesn’t understand your slurred speech quite as well. Or, at least that’s what my wife says.
Could be my heavy Cuban accent. I’ve heard it’s hard to decipher when I speak in Spanglish.
Dammit Brian, until you tuited this diatribe, I was haiku aging my shit. So you forced me to crack a 2018 Bedrock, damn this is good shit…
You’re welcome! ![]()
My rant in the OP involved the wines I listed, how the group think on this board swayed how I treated these wines and my experience this week. I wasn’t rolling all California wines into one statement. That would be foolish.
Wtf, how does Siri change “happy” to “haiku”!?
Bedrock is better young
Bedrock is complex with age
Tuite is often wrongPS. If it ain’t obvious already, I may have accidentally consumed this bottle already.
Haiku Aging My Shit needs to be burned onto a reclaimed piece of wood and hung in the Mud Room next to the Golden Foyer…
Only some aging narcissistic fuck would burn that shit anywhere!
As usual, I’m one step behind.
![]()
