Willamette Valley 2023 Vintage Report

Here’s a detailed vintage summary by Jessica— good overview and insights. I’m super happy with the quality this year. We picked just before the Sept. rains for Pinot and I just got my labs showing ABVs in the 13 to 13.5% range for destem and 12.2 to 13% for whole cluster fermentations, with good acidity ranging from 5.2 to 6.1g/L titratable acidity depending on the clone/block. But most importantly, tastes great with good structure and spice.

2023 Willamette Valley Vintage Summary
Jessica Cortell, Ph.D., owner/manager, Vitis Terra Vineyard Management Services, owner of Cortell-Rose Vineyard and Carlile’s Crest, and owner Cortell Collection Wines!

“In 2022, we had a very dry August, September and October with October being the hottest on record with 80-degree F. days all the way to the end of the month. We needed this to get the grapes ripe as it was a late season. However, this combination of 1) very dry soils through October limiting nutrient uptake to refill the vines reserves, 2) the late harvest which pulled nitrogen, potassium, and carbohydrates away from the storage organs, and (DP editor’s note*) for some, 3) a large crop, resulted in some vines starting the 2023 season in a deficit. The first 6-8 leaves are supported by the nutrient reserves in the trunk and roots so if these are depleted it can result in weak shoot growth and low yields. There was a lot of early season Boron stunting throughout the valley as well as weak areas in the vineyards. While yields were moderate to high due to sunny weather during bloom, some vineyards ended up with very low yields such as 1 ton/acre due to this impact of the 2022 season.

2023 saw a very cold and wet spring so we had one of the latest budbreak events ever around April 27th through May 1st. In 2011, we also had a May Day (May 1st) budbreak but then it stayed cold and rained all the way past the 4th of July and the valley hit bloom around July 10th to 15th. In 2011 we finished on Nov 4th, and we were picking frozen grapes.

While in 2023 budbreak was similar to 2011, after that it was completely different with a sudden shift in weather. After budbreak, the weather was suddenly warm and sunny and there was only one rain event in June. The June rain event was late enough that most sites were through bloom and had good fruitset. There were a few a higher elevation sites that hit bloom during the rain and suffered lower fruitset.

In the phenology of the grapevine, the period from budbreak to bloom can be the most variable as it is controlled by temperatures not the number of days between phenological events as seen between bloom to harvest. Typically, there are about 65 days from budbreak to bloom but in 2023 it was record short with only about 38 to 45 days! One effect of climate change we are seeing is having the growing season get more condensed. This means we have to do all the canopy management in a shorter amount of time…40 days versus 60 or more days. This has an impact on both the labor supply and risk of diseases.

The dry weather from budbreak to bloom kept mildew pressure down during this time but we did see a surprising amount of mildew popping up right around veraison. The mildew showed up in both organic and non-organic vineyards where spray programs were similar to previous years. There was discussion about whether some products failed. My take on it is that we needed even tighter spray intervals than normal as the vines were transitioning through growth phases rapidly and the crop load was large. The prebloom to fruitset period is the highest risk phase. When it progresses rapidly, you might need a 5-day interval to catch the flowers and then small green berries that are at the highest risk for powdery mildew. Add in large clusters that closed up quickly and a large crop load where spray coverage was inadequate due to clusters blocking the spray from other clusters, mildew got started but wasn’t really obvious until veraison. Luckily it was late enough that it did not cause significant issues but did cause clusters to be more susceptible to botrytis later during ripening.

The weather was just ideal all summer… nice 80’s until one hot snap in August from the 13th through the 16th where temperatures ranged from 102 to 107 degrees F. This was toward the end of veraison when the grapes are sensitive to high temperatures. This caused some heat damage in the form of shrivel. Many of the heat damaged grapes dried up and fell off so overall there was not a big impact on quality other than more Botrytis rot in some vineyards.

The fruit quality was great overall with harvest starting at the end of August for sparkling wine then moving into Pinot noir for white and rose wines and Chardonnay in the first week of September. Around 80 percent of the Pinot noir was harvested the second week of September when rains moved in. It rained 2.26 inches between September 24th through the 29th. This delayed picking on the remaining grapes with harvesting continuing in bursts and spurts. Grapes that were harvested in the first two weeks of October included Pinot noir from late sites as well as other varieties including Gamay noir, Tempranillo, Dolcetto and Chenin blanc. Harvest wrapped up around October 15th.

The fruit from several vineyards was very balanced with moderate to low sugars, good acidity, and pH with enough nitrogen to support the fermentation. This was particularly observed in the deeper soils with a higher water holding capacity. In shallow soils with low water holding, the vines started to shut down before the fruit was fully ripe, so sugars stopped accumulating and potassium moved from the leaves into the fruit at a higher level causing the pH values to go up. These blocks also had low YAN and needed nutrient additions during fermentation.

Overall, there was a trend for lower Brix levels as the soil was very dry and the vine’s photosynthesis was shutting down. The rain on September 24th – 29th, while frustrating as it was during the week the bulk of Pinot noir in the valley should have been picked, had several benefits of reducing drought stress and minimizing the risk of forest fires and smoke issues. The general rule of thumb for Pinot noir is that it is 100 days from 50 percent bloom to harvest. I checked the phenology dates for one representative block that was harvested before the rain, and it was exactly 100 days from bloom to harvest! Some of the fruit picked after the rain likely picked more than 100 days from bloom but it is debatable whether there were any improved quality benefits to waiting until after the rain.”

8 Likes

Hi David,

Sorry but there are some serious errors/omissions in the paragraph on 2022.

I’ll read the rest as soon as I post this, but the miniscule yields at Whistling Ridge and Durant in 2022 were due to the freezing weather at bud break. You know the one that in a day turned the just unfurling pure green leaves to grey crispy dead things. Not Boron deficiency.

The lack of commentary on that is beyond belief. It was one of the most impactful negative weather events that has happened in my 22 years producing wine. And it’s just unbelievable that an “expert” would walk by that to posit Boron deficiency as the cause of the issues with diminished yields.

I recognize that Jessica’s vineyard is in the Eola-Amity Hills and the freeze happened previous to bud break in that area. The freeze is well documented and you should either amend her title to Eola-Amity Hills report or delete her absolutely egregious and offensive statement about the yields in 2022.

Seriously.

2 Likes

I think she’s saying that late season drought and heat in 2022 led to reduced crop in some vineyards in 2023. She’s not talking about frost and 2022 yields. Maybe there’s something to it?

4 Likes

Oh she’s only referring to issues with later part of 2022 that may have caused issues into 2023 — the focus of the report. (So some vineyards had boron deficiently in 2023 is what she is referring to.) But yeah, I get your point that not all vineyards would have had such issues.

She manages 40-ish vineyards/500 acres with a focus on organic practices throughout the northern Valley, but yes mostly Eola-Amity (including Seven Springs, Antica Terra) but also Tualatin Hills (Montinore) and many others.

1 Like

It’s extremely poorly written, and suggesting that these conditions of high yields were Valley wide in 2022 leading to issues in 2023 is just stupid.

Half the Valley had ridiculously low yields because of the freeze. Dick Alvord passed away in 2022 and I don’t have a Richard’s Cuvee in 2022 because we had 1000 liters of Chardonnay off of 2.4 acres. So the commentary on 2022s influence on 2023 is just wrong. And basically only even vaguely correct if you are much more specific about where in the Valley you’re talking about.

And she specifically says, “the large yields” referring to 2022 and not in the slightest referencing the fact that that was absolutley vineyard by vineyard.

This is in the early part and followed up by:

“Typically, there are about 65 days from budbreak to bloom but in 2023 it was record short with only about 38 to 45 days! One effect of climate change we are seeing is having the growing season get more condensed. This means we have to do all the canopy management in a shorter amount of time…40 days versus 60 or more days. “

Does that sound like weak shoot growth to you?

Sorry, I am definitely fried on this at the moment, but you oresent Jessica as a PhD, vineyard management company owner, and vineyard owner(all true) and she walks right past the reality that 2022 had vineyards at 180 degree polar opposite situations and describes 2022 influence as a single option.

Her speculation on Boron issues should state “in the vineyards she manages”.

We saw nothing like weak shoot growth in 2023. Rather the opposite, in 2023 the plants were coming off of three consecutive years of low yields but good growing seasons. The vines absolutely were loaded and “ready for bear” as my grandma used to say. They powered a large vintage through like it was no issue at all and ripened the set about as quickly as I have ever seen. Even including Temperance Hill, in the Eola-Amity Hills, which ripened in September with a very normal size crop.

2 Likes

You make good points Marcus but consider the context. This was an email to the few dozen or so people who work with her. It’s titled “Willamette Valley report” but I don’t see Willamette Valley anywhere else. Her readers know her and where she focuses. I used to be in publishing, everyone needs a freaking editor. David kindly posted the email here. I think you can disagree with the content without being offended. I’m not all dug in, I was just surprised by the reaction.

An email to a few dozen people is an email to a few dozen people. When it gets posted to a forum that tens of thousands of people read, either get an editor or be ready for the reaction.

We all post things that aren’t perfect, and I definitely have. Responses help to refine future posts, and this one apparently should have been titled, “An email to a few dozen growers”.

A Vintage Report on this forum needs “to be better”.

Ok then that’s a thread issue, but it’s still pretty minor, no? This is Wine Berserkers, everything that’s fit to print but there’s no real limit to what fits lol.

Anyway I welcome discussion of how the frost AND maybe the weird late season heat and drought played into the yield variability in 2023. I was worried we wouldn’t see much fruit in areas that frosted hard in 2022, happily yields were generally fine if not anything great. And in higher yielding sites in 2022 I wondered if tired vines might yield substantially less in 23 but nope yields were fine mostly. So for me it’s a little different story but we all have our takes.

1 Like

I’ll add that I visited a Dundee Hills area winery yesterday and they work with some cordon pruned Pinot Noir, definitely not common around here (unlike Napa!). They reported decent to fine yields last year when others on cane pruning frosted. But this year? Bad yield! Was it a residual issue from late year’s frost? Boron? Or cordon maybe yielding less some years and this was one of those years? Who knows but it’s fascinating!

Minor? I don’t think so.

  1. WB is followed world wide.

  2. if David had posted his own first person thoughts then it’s his opinion and it would be implied that, even with the thread title, it’s just his posting. He cites Jessica‘s accolades and achievements front and center, titles the thread “Willamette Valley 2023 Vintage Report” and then posts what is apparently an email to her growers about the vintage that in no way encompasses the vintage accurately.

My experience with the 2023 vintage is dis-similar to yours, but I have no issue with your take posted above. What you saw was what you saw and from your post(s), it’s pretty clear you aren’t speaking for the Valley. That isn’t how the OP comes across.

We saw significant rebound from the frost damaged vines last year. While the frost was a brutal day or two, the rest of the growing season was pretty ideal for plants. And they obviously stocked up on nutrients because they set well this year and then ripened the larger crop considerably faster than anything I have seen before.

I started sampling well earlier than anticipated, but based on vineyard walks that showed fruit well ahead of schedule in every way except sugar accumulation. Seeds browned in early September, acids were mature while sugars still hovered in the range of 18-20 Brix. Tartaric/malic ratios were 4/1 early on and most of what we picked had 1.7-2.5g of malic, even picking for sparkling. TAs were still high so acidity is racey but not screechy, while Potassium was a bit high so I expect we’ll see a little bigger shift in some wines as they cold stabilize than is common. Abvs are mostly 11.8-13.3%, with two exceptions that had higher sugars.

No offense to anyone but when I first started posting here, I put up a post that had some ill-remembered information about an Italian producer and a board regular called me out on it immediately. He took it seriously, and I definitely understood that I needed to pay better attention. Over the next year I learned the value of IMO.

1 Like

Good points— will definitely be more careful, and for one thing, I didn’t ask for permission to share this out more broadly. But in her defense she does qualify that “some vines” had issues in 2023 which she believes is due to three 2022 factors. So not a valley-wide issue, but enough of one that it was a significant challenge to some. I personally know of two vineyards in EAH that had high yields in 2022 and low yields in 2023 (as in 50% less). And I only know 20-ish growers….

But absolutely, on the third factor (high yields in 2022) the statement definitely should have been statement “for those vines with high yield”. I believe that is her intent here. I’ll add an editor’s note to the OP….

I am surprised that the “Willamette Valley” is considered a useful term for a specific report given how large the region is (3,430,400 acres). Isn’t that one of the reasons that there are now ten or eleven AVAs and counting? It is much larger than Champagne and yet it is regularly said on this board that you can’t make sweeping statements about vintages for that region.

1 Like

I think we all have experiences where we’ve spoken of another’s work and gotten it wrong. I might have gotten into winemaking in 1999 for doing exactly that!

In contrast, we have an example here of someone talking about their own work and being accused of getting it wrong. There’s irony here.

Am I going to belabor all this? Hell yes. It’s Wine Berserkers lol, why stop now. Is my Willamette Valley Pinot Noir bottling misrepresentative of our large valley because it only consists of fruit from a few localized vineyards? Perhaps so! But I’d ask for some grace. I put forward a wine with a Willamette Valley label each year and really it’s an ask that you accept it as MY version of things. Representative if not definitive. And I think the same for Jessica’s well intentioned Willamette Valley vintage report.

Our tasting today Marcus should be more interesting than ever!!

2 Likes

I appreciate your post here and agree about checking with her before reposting. That occurred to me this morning. And being more careful about presentation.

Even based upon your last post, it seems this should have been called an Eola-Amity Hills vintage report.

But we get fruit from Temperance Hill, and there was no effect on the vineyard by the freeze that devastated Whistling Ridge, so 2022 yields were good at that one site for us. But in 2023 yields were very normal (2.75-3.2 tons per acre).

That illustrates that in EA H Jessica’s comments about “some vines” is a fair statement, but she never addresses the reality for many of us that 2022 yields were anything but high.

This is an especially sore point right now as we’re putting together blends right now for 2022, and I have 3 total puncheons of free run Whistling Ridge wines from 2022. 165 cases plus 80 cases that went to Blanc de Noirs. That’s 245 total cases of possible vineyard designate wines off of 7+ acres of vines.

And the lack of set in 2020-2022 at the vineyard left us in a very, very, very different situation with 2023.

Again, my issue here is the over arching title and the positioning of Jessica’s level of expertise front and center. Most readers seeing the words Vintage Report will assume either it’s your take or a comprehensive review of the 2023 vintage in the Willamette Valley. If you make your post a serious claim, it’s going to get taken seriously.

Your WV Pinot Noir can’t be mis-representative of the Willamette Valley because the fruit is from the Willamette Valley. But you don’t sell it as a comprehensive view of Willamette Valley fruits, rather one voice.

But using the Eola-Amity Hills as the basis for a Willamette Valley vintage report is definitely a problem in 2022 and apparently 2023. It was an outlier sub-AVA in 2022 to the other sub-AVAs.

I don’t think that this is about attacking someone for their honest opinion, or posting that. I’m pointing out that it should be posted as an email to growers about the vintage.

For all of my grousing, there’s plenty of readable information here. It just doesn’t apply to 85% of of my fruit sources in the Willamette Valley. And the heavy focus on Eola-Amity conditions in this report is still interesting to read for seeing other opinions about that area.

See you at 3!

2 Likes

After visiting OR a couple weeks ago and hearing first hand the devastation in 2022 in certain vineyards coupled with the fires of 2020 I am reminded of how just powerful Mother Nature is and how dependent farming is to her whims. I grew up in the Midwest in an agricultural dependent four generation family business.

The lack of wine from WR in 2022 is incredibly unfortunate especially with no Richards to honor Dick. Microclimates are very interesting - so glad the vines were able to recover and deliver a nice crop in 2023.

RIP my young vine chard at Temperance Hill Vineyard in April 2022 :cry:

What about Armstrong Vineyard fruit in 2022? Hope to set up a visit with you on our next OR adventure!

Definitely let me know when you’re coming. Armstrong saw a hard frost in 2022 so yields were definitely down that year. However they weren’t as bad as feared, thankfully. Good weather at flowering helped the vines set as much as they could, even if cluster size was generally low and number of cluster per plant very low in some cases. Coulda been a lot worse.

1 Like