I agree with Eric Z. Way too much (~700 bottles in 21ā )
Cellartracker says:
60% Burgundy (70% red/30% white)
23% Mosel Saar Ruwer
8% Oregon (Walter Scott plus whatever Lingua Franca/Saffron Fields/Dusky Goose/Bethel Heights my wife likes)
7% California (Chanin- well worth checking out)
For 2021, it was 25% California (nearly all Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir) and 75% Champagne (virtually all of that was grower). Iāve got my cellar now up to 60% Champagne, with a goal of 75%. When I get there, Iāll be right where I want it.
2021 was our second highest volume purchasing year on record, but average per bottle cost is relatively flat over the last 5 years. Iāve had some really good opportunities and capitalized on them to add some great stuff to my cellar, but I have a good amount of long term aging wine now so I anticipate slowing down dramatically. December is the lowest monthly purchase volume since I started tracking, but the highest per bottle value.
France 42.5%
Champagne 17.3%
Bordeaux 6.0%
Burgundy 7.7%
RhƓne 6.0%
Loire Valley 2.4%
Provence 2.9%
Jura 0.1%
Germany 34.7%
Mosel Saar Ruwer 22.6%
Nahe 9.9%
Pfalz 2.2%
USA 14.4%
Oregon 9.9%
California 1.8%
Washington 2.7%
Italy 7.9%
Piedmont 6.5%
Tuscany 1.2%
Sicily 0.1%
Plus 1 bottle of 1946 PX, 2 1969 Austrian stickies, and 2 bottles of Musar.
Burgundy 34% (mostly red, about 2/3 new releases)
Germany 19% (Mosel and Nahe Riesling)
Piedmont 17% (all red, 95% Nebbiolo)
RhƓne 12% (mostly red, all N. RhƓne)
California 6%
Champagne 5%
Little bits of Loire, Oregon, Bordeaux, Tuscany, others.
Germany has been trending up, while California has been trending down the last few years. No surprise there for me. RhƓne is my new darling, I expect that to grow next year. And, in general, still buying way too much!
But I am not satisfied with my Champagne buying. Next year this will be a bigger fraction of the total. Issue 1: I need to keep tasting broadly. The things I really love are pricey/hard to get in volume (all the stuff people here talk about way too much - Cedric Bouchard, Taittinger Comtes, etc.). Iām sure itās lack of experience, but I feel like there is a bigger deliciousness difference between the $150ish and $75 price points in Champagne relative to other wine types/regions. Sadly there arenāt any sub $50 Champagnes that inspire me to buy over and over, and just a handful in the $60-$80 range that I love (e.g. Agrapart 7 Crus and Terroirs, Vilmart Grand Cellier, Laherte Freres various crus). Gotta keep hunting. I do have some new things to try already!
Do you buy mostly to drink wines over a short period of years or to cellar for longer periods. I drink a lot more whites than it shows as a percentage of my cellar as I tend to age reds more than whites. So, it makes me wonder, are you drinking your reds on the younger side or aging your Champagnes for long periods or a little of both.
Definitely, truth is on any given occasion cool climate Pinot (Oregon/true Sonoma coast) or bubbles is always my first thought now.
I would once again like to thank Brig for that bottle of Jaquesson 738 which was revelatory for me.
Craig, if you like that wine, see if you can track down the DT version, which is the late disgorged version (you may know this already). I think the 739DT is the current release for DT.