I bought a lot of 1993 Red Burgs upon release, but I bought mainly based upon wine reviews (at that point, mainly Tanzer) and unfortunately I did not taste most of those wines when they first arrived. Subsequently, 1993 has turned out to be my favorite mature vintage released during my wine buying “career”…that is, of the wines that I bought upon release (as opposed to backfilling earlier vintages), and that have had ample time to mature (therefore excluding 1999’s of which I bought a load), 1993 has absolutely been my favorite vintage.
So, I am wondering, since I have NO IDEA what they tasted like upon release, has there been any recent vintage that has had similar characteristics? In the ongoing debate over 2008 vs. 2009, are there any characteristics of 2008 that resemble 1993? Or is there any greater resemblance to 1996, a vintage where some wines have been excellent and some are still screechy with acid and I have not enjoyed it anywhere near as much as 1993. I feel that I have gotten more enjoyment at all stages of development from the 1993’s as compared to the 1996’s, for example, and I worry just a little that the 2008’s might display their acid for a long time, and I might be waiting for them 15 years from now just like I continue to wait for the 1996’s. At this stage in my wine buying, I am not wanting to wait for another 1996, but I sure would wait for another 1993. Now, don’t think that I am looking for a low acid riper vintage…you notice I am looking for 1993’s, and not 1990’s, 1997’s, 2003’s, etc. It seems that “everyone” (most serious Red Burg consumers) are lusting after the 2008’s over the 2009’s, but the one tasting I participated in just gave me the impression of medium weight fruit and prominent acid structure, and i wondered whether the depth of fruit was enough to outlast the acid. Perhaps I need to taste some more.
I figure 1993 must not have showed consistently so well early from barrel and early from bottle since it was not universally praised at first, and of course Parker and his minions dissed the wines at first (and, amazingly, they stuck with the party line for years to come for that matter), but in retrospect it was a great vintage. Are there any comparisons to be made with more recent vintages?