Don’t know if anyone has posted on this yet, but the intrepid Panos Kakaviatos set up a wine dinner at Ruths Chris steakhouse in DC last Thursday, featuring extended verticals of Leoville and Langoa Barton and the participation of the charming Lillian Barton. The company was terrific, including lots of WB posters and great turnout from the DC wine crowd. I sat across from Keith Levenberg and between Ian Lippner and David Theis, and the conversation was as good as the wine. Also present were Rutger De Vink of RDV Vineyards (‘first growth Virginia’) fame, and Dave McIntyre, the Post’s wine critic.
The ‘gimmick’ tonight was guessing blind which wines were Langoa and which were Leoville, with only the vintages identified. Having never really had Langoa before I for one wasn’t really able to do that – I took the terribly prejudiced route of guessing everything I liked was Leoville and everything I was ‘meh’ about was Langoa. But I’m always down for 13 vintages of good Bordeaux whether or not I can name a single wine.
2011 Mauvesin Barton (Moulis) – we started off with a new Barton property in Moulis en Medoc. If I understood Lillian correctly they bought this because they didn’t have enough properties for all the Barton kids interested in winemaking – nice problem to have, and to be able to solve! I found this surprisingly fruity, open and friendly for such a young wine, I guess it was a barrel sample. Lots of merlot on this one but also a nice spiciness that might have come from cab franc (didn’t sense much CS here). Not a ton of structure, but had good freshness, a vivid nose, nice roundness and enough of an herbal quality to keep things interesting. You could definitely still tell you were in Bordeaux. Particularly impressive given the mediocre vintage. Good value for $20, I’d buy it.
Sorry that my notes are somewhat fragmentary; the more years I spend in wine the less detailed my notes get and the more I just like to sniff and drink and not bother with the adjectives…not sure where that’s coming from.
First flight – 2004 to 2006
2004: Corked on the nose, and the fruit felt stripped on the non-descript palate. I couldn’t get anything out of this one. Others who had non-corked bottles said it was quite good. Leoville Barton.
2005: A lot of depth here, surprisingly round and plush for 2005. Good midpalate and richness but lacks a bit of complexity. Licorice emerges with time. Guessed Langoa, was Langoa.
2006: A bit green, acidic, good tangy quality but really nothing special. Guessed Langoa, was Langoa.
Second flight – 1998 to 2000
This was my favorite flight, all three wines really had something to offer and were in a nice place on their aging curve.
1998: nice wine. Has a certain stiffness I associate with 1998 left bank, depth is not fantastic but very Cab Sauv. Would have been better on its own because the other two wines in this flight had me distracted. Guessed Leoville, was Langoa.
1999: Hey there, 1999! My wine of the night. I always felt 99 was a seriously underrated vintage, at its best it just has so much charm. One of the first classed growths I ever bought was a couple of bottles of 99 Lynch, and they really kick-started my wine addiction – terrific young and never have shut down. I’ve always found the best 99 left banks to have a very supple, seductive quality that is never heavy or overbearing, just a charming understated warmth and complexity. One of the best under-the-radar vintages to drink while you’re waiting for those vintages of the century, IMO better than 2001 on the left bank anyway. Anyway, this wine had all those qualities. I hadn’t had a 1999 in some time and this was a great reintroduction. My full written notes read “Hey! I really like this wine! Round but not soft, a charmer!”, so you’ll have to infer from there. It actually tasted quite different from the Leoville Barton sterotype, but I guessed Leoville anyway since I didn’t think a Langoa would have the stuffing to do all this wine was doing. It was indeed Leoville Barton.
2000: Very classic Bordeaux and very Cab Sauv, classic mix of leafiness/stalkiness and cassis, with a vivid toasted/scorched streak down the middle but not oaky. Vivid acidity but enough fruit to carry it. Really nice wine, good complexity and a lot going on. I kept my nose buried in the glass for a long time, always a good indicator. (If I had my way people would stop timing finishes and start timing how long they inhaled the wine before they drank it, that’s a more telling sign of quality). But it didn’t have a ton of depth and was further along in aging than I imagine 2000 Leoville Barton would be now, so I guessed Langoa. It was indeed Langoa.
Third flight – 1990, 1995, 1996
1990: Whoa. No! I had been looking forward to 1990, but this is a hot pruny mess. Keith Levenberg claimed the vivid notes of nail polish remover that accompanied the blast of alcohol represent ‘volatile acidity’, but when I asked him why ‘volatile acidity’ smells like nail polish remover while just plain ‘acidity’ smells like delightful freshness he just waved away the question and said he wasn’t a chemist. So judge his credibility for yourself . (And if any real chemists are reading this, I’d love to hear the answer). Anyway, this wine was practically undrinkable. If 1990 is our leading indicator of what hot-weather vintages are going to taste like at 20-25 years old then experiences like this are a little scary. Guessed ??? didn’t care, was Leoville Barton.
1995: OK, back in Bordeaux. This one was kind of like 1998, nice enough wine but just didn’t impress me enough to write much down. Leoville Barton.
1996: Ah, very nice. There’s a particular 1996 quality I really like, a nice green leafiness perfectly balanced by cassis fruit. It’s just such a good cabernet sauv vintage, the best 96s nail that stalky quality and buffer it all around with nice fruit so its not overly green. This must be Leoville Barton…nope, it’s Langoa Barton. A little surprised I preferred 96 Langoa to 95 Leoville.
Fourth flight – 2008, 2009, 2010
2008 – a little green and dry and shut-down feeling but that might just be compared to other two vintages. Does still have a vein of cassis running through it though. Not sure what to make of this one, maybe just a bit asleep, again the other two vintages upset my palate here though. Guessed ???, was Leoville Barton
2009 – Wow. I’ve only had a couple of top 2009s but they have all shared this pronounced midpalate sweetness, it’s like you can roll the sugar crystals on your tongue. But the balance on the wines is good enough that it doesn’t matter. This one feels like a very classic 2009 – dense and balanced, very deep and sweet midpalate, plenty of tannins on the back end but they aren’t harsh tannins and just fit smoothly into the overall flow of the wine. A very good wine if you like them rich, this is a ‘Napa Bordeaux’ vintage. Well, either Langoa hit a home run this year or this is Leoville. It’s Leoville Barton. (As a side note – Parker sort of missed the boat on this one, he always seems to describe LB as having excruciating tannins and an old fashioned style, that’s not really an accurate take on this wine).
2010 – Not so good here. A strikingly sweet attack on this wine, almost a confected / candied quality up front. Some artificial violet flavor, followed by a hollow and tannic midpalate and trails off with some more tannins on the finish. I don’t think I like this wine, it feels faked somehow. Hope this is not an indicator of 2010 vintage character. Out of balance and hollow. OK, the midpalate fills in some with time in the glass, gets it up to the mediocre level maybe, but not enough to fully right the ship. Better than the 1990 at least. Don’t know which wine this is? It’s Langoa Barton.
Final wine – 1989
Panos generously shared a magnum of a 1989 Barton to finish things off. Really really nice, maybe tied with the 2009 for my second favorite wine of the night (after the 1999), although this is very classical and a totally different character than the 2009. Just the complete aged Bordeaux package here, excellent savory and herbal character framed by graceful and still lively fruit. Very nice, guessed Leoville Barton but was Langoa Barton.