TN: Castello di Monsanto 2012-1983 vertical (with some Castell'in Villa)

Time for another vertical tasting report!

The estate of Castello di Monsanto is very old - the main building originates from the 1740’s - but the winery we know has been in existence only since the early 1960’s. Currently the winery is run by Fabrizio Bianchi - the person who acquired the property in 1961 from his father Aldo Bianchi - and Fabrizio’s daughter Laura.

The winery is probably best known for what is commonly regarded as the first Cru Chianti, Il Poggio. This wine came into existence when Fabrizio recognized the exceptional quality of fruit that came from one specific vineyard - Il Poggio. Instead of blending this fruit with the Chianti Classico, Fabrizio decided to vinify and bottle this plot separately, effectively creating the first single-vineyard Chianti Classico and making Il Poggio a Cru vineyard.

Just like all Chianti Classico wines, also Castello di Monsanto wines used to be very traditional, blending small amounts of Canaiolo and Colorino with Sangiovese and aging the wines in Slavonian oak botti. However, the wines have been modernized to some degree and currently only the normale Chianti Classico is a traditional Chianti, made with Sangiovese, Canaiolo and Colorino and aged in old, neutral botti casks. The Chianti Classico Riserva and Il Poggio wines are made from the traditional blend of three Chianti grape varieties, but aged in barriques (CCR) and 500-liter demi-muids (both), part of which are new. They also make a 100% Sangiovese wine, Sangioveto Grosso, but they prefer to label it IGT Toscana rather than Chianti Classico, even if the appellation allows for 100% Sangiovese-wines now.

This vertical concentrated mainly in Il Poggio wines, but we also had some CCR bottlings along with a couple of 2006 Chiantis from another superb producer, Castell’in Villa.
chianticlassico.jpg

3 Likes
  • 2012 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (90%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 18-20 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in French oak barriques and 500-liter demi-muids. 14% alcohol.

Youthful, luminous and moderately translucent cherry red color. Ripe, clean and very classically styled CC nose with aromas of fresh red fruits, some ripe cherries, a little bit of licorice, light meaty tones, a hint of darker forest fruits and a touch of tobacco. The wine is firm, dry and noticeably bitter on the palate with a medium body and savory flavors of fresh cranberries and pronounced sour cherry bitterness, some dark forest fruits, a little bit of tobacco, light gravelly mineral tones, a hint of wood spice and a touch of licorice root. High acidity with gently grippy medium tannins. The high alcohol lends a bit of warmth to the palate. The finish is firm, long and slightly warm with flavors of pronounced sour cherry bitterness, tart lingonberries, some savory wood spice, a little bit of ferrous blood, light notes of tobacco and a hint of ripe dark berries.

A nice, fresh and gastronomic Chianti Classico that performs very gracefully despite the rather high alcohol%. The overall feel here was surprisingly bitter; for sure sour cherry bitterness is to be expected from a Sangiovese, but in our tasting 12 Chianti Classicos, this wine was noticeably more bitter than any other wine we had. I can imagine this kind of pronounced bitterness can be a distracting element for people less familiar with Chianti Classico, so be warned. Other than that, the wine is a terrific food wine with well-proportioned fruit, bright acidity and firm yet unobtrusive tannins. Seeing how youthful the wine still is, I can imagine it will continue to age nicely for years more. Priced according to its quality at 23€. (89 pts.)

  • 1987 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (90%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 18-20 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in French oak barriques and 500-liter demi-muids. 13% alcohol.

Aged, quite translucent syrupy-brown color. Pungent, noticeably oxidative nose with aromas of rancio, some Marsala tones, a little bit of chopped nuts, light raisiny tones and a hint of sun-baked earth. The wine is dry, oxidative and quite flavor on the palate with flavors of rancio, raisins, some nuttiness, a little bit of beef jerky and a hint of salinity. The wine is quite high in acidity with moderately grippy tannins. The finish is long, flat and oxidative with quite thin flavors of raisins, some sour cherry bitterness, a little bit of nutty rancio, light beef jerky tones and a metallic hint of rusted iron.

Past its peak. Either a poor bottle or then this vintage just isn’t alive anymore. Not worth the price at 40€. NR (flawed)

  • 1990 Castello di Monsanto Nemo Vigneto Il Mulino Toscana IGT - Italy, Tuscany, Toscana IGT (7.6.2021)
    100% Cabernet Sauvignon from the Mulino vineyard planted in the mid-1970. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 20-22 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in French oak barriques. Labeled “Vino da Tavola di Toscana”. 13,5% alcohol.

Developed, slightly maroon-hued figgy color. Developed, somewhat dusty and slightly Bordelais nose with aromas of evolved meatiness, some minty notes, a little bit of sweet, toasty oak, light juicy notes of wizened blackcurrants, a hint of blood and a touch of mocha coffee. The wine is ripe, suave and silky on the palate with a full body and evolved flavors of juicy blackcurrants and wizened dark plums, some toasty oak spice, light minty notes, a little bit of espresso, a hint of meaty umami and a woody-smoky touch of cigar box. Although the wine tastes dry, the flavors have a subtly sweet edge to them. Nice, high acidity and firm, somewhat grippy medium tannins. The finish is ripe yet quite dry and very savory with rather persistent flavors of gamey meat, wizened blackcurrants, some dried figs, a little bit of toasty oak spice, light mocha tones, a hint of raw, bloody meat and a touch of roasted spices.

A tasty, sophisticated and enjoyable Super-Tuscan that retains a rather modernist, polished quality to its aromatics even at 30 years of age, but has fortunately evolved into a something very nuanced and harmonious. I guess this must have been quite an oak bomb in its youth, but now the developed savory tones have come to the fore and most of the oak has integrated with the fruit, so the overall feel doesn’t come across as too modern, but instead has an air of an aged Left-Bank Bordeaux. Although I’m not a big fan of these heavily oaked Super-Tuscan reds, this wine was a positive specimen in its genre. Priced according to its quality at 40€. (92 pts.)

  • 2006 Castell’in Villa Chianti Classico - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    100% Sangiovese blended from 8 different vineyards. Aged for approximately 12 months in old, large oak casks. 13,5% alcohol.

Moderately translucent blood-red color with a slightly evolved maroon hue and a pale, almost colorless brick-orange rim. Quite open, fragrant and somewhat evolved nose with layered aromas of wizened black cherries, some bouillon, a little bit of sweet raisiny fruit, light balsamic tones, a hint of game and a touch of dried figs. The wine is lively, firm and medium-bodied on the palate with pure flavors of cranberries and sour cherry bitterness, some wizened black cherries, light savory notes of meat stew, light ferrous notes of blood, a hint of earth and a touch of game. The overall feel is enjoyably structured, thanks to the high acidity and somewhat grippy medium tannins. The finish is dry, gently grippy and long with a savory aftertaste of sour cherry bitterness, wizened cranberries, some sanguine notes of iron, a little bit of savory meat stew, a hint of tobacco and a touch of tart lingonberries.

A very lovely, balanced and classically built Chianti Classico in a terrific spot right now. Not a grand vin in any way, just a perfect everyday Sangiovese that can be easily paired with just about anything that calls for bright, fresh red wine. Starting to show some age, but I can imagine the wine still has stuffing to improve for at least a handful of years more. Drink or keep. Solid value at 23€. (91 pts.)

  • 2006 Castell’in Villa Chianti Classico Riserva - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    100% Sangiovese made with the highest-quality fruit sourced from 8 different vineyards. Aged for 2-3 years in old, large oak casks. 14% alcohol.

Somewhat translucent blood-red color with a slightly evolved brick-red hue and a pale garnet rim - looks slightly more youthful compared to the Castell’in Villa Chianti Classico 2006 that was tasted alongside. Brooding, restrained and subtly sweet-toned nose with somewhat closed aromas of ripe figs, some leather, light earthy notes, a little bit of tobacco, a lifted hint of VA and a touch of woody spice. The wine is ripe, somewhat concentrated and moderately full-bodied on the palate - the overall feel is fuller, weightier and somewhat more bitter than the regular CC 2006. Pure flavors of fresh wild strawberries, quite pronounced sour cherry bitterness, some crunchy notes of red plums, a little bit of tobacco, light gamey tones, a hint of ripe dark forest fruits and a touch of savory wood spice. The overall feel is quite structured with the rather high acidity and moderately grippy medium-plus tannins. The finish is long and somewhat grippy with dry flavors of sour cherries and tart lingonberries, some gamey tones, a little bit of savory wood spice, light earthy notes and a hint of pipe tobacco.

A very nice, pure and quite stern Chianti Classico Riserva which has quite a bit of stuffing, yet doesn’t feel overdone one little bit. The regular Castell’in Villa Chianti Classico 2006 was more expressive and accessible at this point, whereas this Riserva bottling came across as slightly closed and more tightly-knit, yet this wine felt more impressive in comparison - and also relatively youthful for its age. The regular CC 2006 was already starting to show some age, but this Riserva 2006 wasn’t - on the contrary, it felt like this wine could use another 5-10 years or so before it really starts to enter its drinking window. Honestly, this feels like a wine that is going to make some beautiful old bones. Expect the score to go up as the wine ages. Highly recommended. (93 pts.)

  • 2010 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva Il Poggio - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (95%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 20-22 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in partly new 500-liter demi-muids. 14% alcohol.

Somewhat translucent garnet color with a pale brick-red rim. Ripe, somewhat sweet-toned and slightly closed nose with aromas of meat stew, licorice root, some wizened black cherries, a little bit of cranberry marmalade, light lifted notes of ethery VA, a hint of earth and a touch of toasty oak spice. The wine is ripe, silky and enjoyably firm on the palate with a moderately full body and dry flavors of fresh dark plums, some sour cherry bitterness, a little bit of savory wood spice, light notes of game and blood, sweeter hints of wild strawberries and wizened figs and a touch of asphalt. The overall feel is quite structured, thanks to the rather high acidity and moderately grippy medium-plus tannins. The high alcohol lends a bit of warmth to the palate. The finish is juicy, moderately grippy and somewhat warm with bright flavors of tart red plums, sour cherry bitterness, some sweeter notes of wild strawberries, a little bit of savory wood spice, light figgy tones, a toasty hint of dark-toned chocolatey oak and a touch of leather.

A quite impressive and promising Chianti Classico Riserva that still feels very youthful, but also quite tightly-knit and aromatically somewhat closed at this point. The wine isn’t tough, unyielding or forbidding, but it feels like it is more about future potential than instant gratification. Although the wine isn’t oaky in any way, there’s still a bit of new oak character that peeks underneath the fruit at times. This feels like a wine that needs another 10 years before it will start to show its best and most likely the wine will continue to age gracefully for multiple decades. Although the wine is pretty impressive now, I’d recommend leaving this wine in the cellar and drink Monsanto’s CC and CC Riservas instead. (90 pts.)

  • 2006 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva Il Poggio - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (95%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 20-22 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in partly new 500-liter demi-muids. 14% alcohol.

Quite deep, dark and only very little translucent blackish-red color with an evolved maroon hue. Somewhat restrained nose with aromas of dusty earth and asphalt, some wizened black cherries, a little bit of dried figs and raisiny fruit, light licorice tones, a hint of savory wood spice and a touch of blood. The wine is ripe, silky and juicy on the palate with a full body and moderately evolved flavors of sweet, dark fruits, tobacco, some bitter sour cherry and lingonberry tones, a little bit of wizened cranberries, light dried-fruit notes of raisins and dates, an umami hint of meat stew and a touch of peppery spice. The overall feel is pretty structured, thanks to the high acidity and ample, grippy tannins. The finish is long, quite savory and rather tannic with flavors of peppery spice, sour cherry bitterness, meaty umami, some wizened cranberry tones, a little bit of toasty oak spice, light dried-fruit notes of raisins and figs, a hint of charred game and a touch of dusty, sun-baked earth.

A savory and rather sunny Chianti Classico Riserva that doesn’t feel super-ripe, but certainly has a solar quality to it, lending a somewhat roasted feel to the flavors. There’s a lot of good stuff here - especially the combination of impressive structure and bold yet not overdone fruit - but the wine is still not a bullseye. Although this wine is very lean, sinewy and well-proportioned in a world of jammy, overripe wines, this nevertheless feels a bit too roasted, sunny and extracted for a Chianti Classico - it might not be that obvious when drunk alone, but in our tasting of 12 Chianti Classicos, this wine felt a bit “too much”, if it makes sense. Nevertheless, this is a terrific wine that is in a great spot right now. Structurally the wine might continue to soften with age, but aromatically the wine seemed like it is very close to its apogee and I suspect that any development in this department is going to remain pretty limited. Drink or keep. (93 pts.)

  • 2003 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva Il Poggio - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (95%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 20-22 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in partly new 500-liter demi-muids. 14% alcohol.

Very dark and deep maroon color that permits relatively little color through. Big, rich and somewhat wizened nose with sweetly-fruited aromas of raisins and wizened black cherries, some prune juice, a little bit of dried dates, light thinner notes of alcohol, a hint of pipe tobacco and a touch of balsamic richness. The wine feels full-bodied, concentrated and quite structured on the palate with obvious sense of ripeness, yet the wine doesn’t feel one bit overripe, unlike so many other Tuscan 2003 wines. Dry flavors of wizened black cherries, some old leather notes, a little bit of peppery spice, light lifted notes of balsamico, sweeter dried-fruit hints of raisins and dates and a touch of sour cherry bitterness. The overall feel is very structured and quite tightly-knit with the high acidity and quite tough, assertive tannins. The finish is ripe, juicy and slightly sweet with firm, grippy tannins and rather long flavors of wizened black cherries, some pruney tones, a little bit of balsamic richness, light raisiny fruit, a hint of pipe tobacco and a touch of old leather.

I was expecting an overripe, boozy mess of a wine from this 2003 vintage, but unlike many of its peers, this Il Poggio 2003 doesn’t really show any signs of the exceptionally hot vintage. Instead it is remarkably dry, fresh and balanced in style, just like a great Chianti Classico should be - only perhaps a bit bigger and more muscular than Il Poggio normally is. It’s hard to say whether the dried-fruit notes are the result of the vintage, bottle age or both, but fortunately they never manage to dominate. There’s still a lot of stuffing here and most likely the wine will continue to improve for a good number of years. One of the best 2003 Italian wines I’ve tasted. Terrific stuff, highly recommended. (93 pts.)

  • 1997 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva Il Poggio - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (95%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 20-22 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in partly new 500-liter demi-muids. 13,5% alcohol.

Quite dark, moderately deep and somewhat translucent garnet color with a brick-red rim. Somewhat dull, stuffy and slightly dusty nose with aromas of earth and damp wood, followed by sweeter notes of wizened figs and raisins, some old leather and a little bit of sunny dark fruit. Overall the nose doesn’t give much and feels perhaps a bit off. The wine is ripe, full-bodied and silky with quite savory flavors of juicy black cherries and sunny plummy fruit, some toasty oak spice, a little bit of dried figs, light ferrous notes of blood, a hint of sour cherry bitterness and a touch of dusty, sun-baked earth. The overall feel is rather modest in acidity for Il Poggio and the medium tannins start to feel rather resolved at this point. The finish is dry with a quite long aftertaste of ripe dark plums, some wizened red cherries, a little bit of savory wood spice, light dusty tones, a hint of earth and a touch of sour cherry bitterness. The alcohol becomes quite pronounced towards the end of the aftertaste.

At first the wine seemed corked, but it never seemed to get worse (as opposed to how corked wines usually behave) and there was quite a bit of fruit left in the wine. However, I see that many users in CT have commented that the wine isn’t up to par, so I’m inclined to think that we really didn’t have an off bottle, but there seems to be some kind of systemic problem with this vintage; too many notes seemed to exhibit the same traits as our bottle. All in all, a somewhat disappointing vintage of Il Poggio - even if the wine wasn’t aromatically sound, the structure and persistence here wasn’t at the same level with the other Il Poggio vintages we tasted at the same event. (85 pts.)

  • 1985 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva Il Poggio - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (95%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 20-22 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in partly new 500-liter demi-muids. 13,5% alcohol.

Luminous, somewhat evolved and quite translucent brick-red color with a deep ruby core. Mature, somewhat wizened and wonderfully complex nose with seductive aromas of wizened dark forest fruits, some ripe black cherries, light leathery tones, a little bit of earth, dried-fruit hints of raisins and dried dates, a touch of pouch tobacco and a whiff of cranberry sauce. Lovely! The wine is full-bodied, silky and resolved on the palate with complex, evolved flavors of wizened red cherries and sour cherry bitterness, pouch tobacco, some beef jerky tones, a little bit of charred game, light salty-umami notes of soy sauce, a hint of dried figs and a touch of old, cracking leather. The wine still retains great sense of structure, thanks to its rather high acidity and still moderately grippy medium-plus tannins. The finish is long and savory with persistent, layered flavors of sour cherries, meaty umami, some crunchy cranberry tones, a little bit of charred game, light notes of tobacco, a hint of smoky cigar and a touch of beef jerky. The wine ends on a moderately grippy note and the sour cherry bitterness seems to grow in intensity towards the end of the aftertaste.

A beautiful, wonderfully evolved and remarkably complex Chianti Classico that is in a terrific spot right now. While not a “big” wine by any means, the wine is surprisingly ripe and concentrated for an 80’s Chianti Classico. I doubt the wine is going to evolve much further from here, but most likely this will keep good for years - maybe even decades. Easily one of the most impressive Chiantis I’ve tasted and ever-so-slightly more impressive than the almost as exceptional Il Poggio 1983. Stunning stuff, highly recommended. (95 pts.)

  • 1983 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva Il Poggio - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Sangiovese (95%), Canaiolo and Colorino. Fermented and macerated with the skins for 20-22 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged for approximately 18 months in partly new 500-liter demi-muids. 13,5% alcohol.

Evolved, moderately translucent maroon color with an orange-yellow rim. Ripe, somewhat sweet and quite dark-toned nose with mature aromas of wizened black cherries, tobacco, some dried dates, a little bit of sweet balsamic VA, light salty liquorice notes, a hint of smoke and a touch of cranberry sauce. The wine is evolved, full-bodied and silky on the palate with a taste that at first feels juicier and sweeter, then turns drier and more savory. Flavors of sour cherries, meaty umami, some licorice root, a little bit of ripe forest fruits, light tart lingonberry tones, a hint of beef jerky and a touch of pouch tobacco. The sour cherry bitterness seems to kick in on the backbeat. Wonderfully high acidity with rather resolved medium tannins that still retain a bit of grip, but contribute more to the texture rather than the structure. The finish is ripe, savory and gently grippy with long flavors of wizened cherries, some crunchy cranberries, a little bit of game and beef jerky, light salty liquorice tones, a hint of tart lingonberry and a touch of earth.

A beautiful, classically built Chianti Classico with a lot of age, but not a bit too much. The wine is very evolved, yet retains quite a bit of fruit, so that it doesn’t come across as too tertiary. The structure feels perfectly in balance with the body and the fruit, so that the wine drinks just wonderfully with and without food. All in all, a very impressive and rewarding wine for an aged Chianti Classico; only an inch less impressive than the excellent Il Poggio 1985. Highly recommended. (94 pts.)

  • 1983 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (7.6.2021)
    Confusingly, this wine had the label of Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva, but the label said “Chianti Classico Riserva del Poggio”. The wine was tasted next to Il Poggio Chianti Classico Riserva 1983, which had a different label and tasted different. Can’t say if this was normal Monsanto CCR or a distinct bottling. 13,5% alcohol.

Evolved, moderately translucent maroon color with an orange-yellow rim. Quite tertiary and subtly oxidative nose with aromas of raisins, tobacco or cigar wrapper, some wizened sour cherries, light minty notes, a little bit of oxidative beef jerky, a hint of autumnal leaves and a touch of sous-bois. The wine is developed, silky and slightly oxidative on the palate with a full body and dry, tertiary flavors of beef jerky and salty soy sauce, some wizened sour cherries, light sanguine notes of gamey meat, a little bit of rich hoi sin, hints of earth and tobacco and a crunchy touch of tart cranberries. The structure relies mostly on the high acidity, as the powdery, fully resolved tannins feel very mellow and do not grip anymore. The finish is savory, slightly more grippy and somewhat earthy with slightly oxidative flavors of beef jerky, dried sour cherries, some autumnal leaves, a little bit of licorice root, light hoi sin notes, a hint of tangy-umami soy sauce character and a touch of old, dried cigar.

A pretty lovely, old Chianti Classico with quite a bit of age. Tasting this side by side with Il Poggio 1983, it was very obvious that this wine was noticeably more evolved and already getting somewhat oxidative, whereas Il Poggio was just singing. This wine still offers quite a bit of pleasure and is far from getting too old for enjoyment, but there’s no denying that the wine slowly gliding downhill and it must’ve been in a better shape some years ago. Time to drink up. (90 pts.)

  • 1995 Castello di Monsanto Vin Santo del Chianti La Chimera - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Vin Santo del Chianti (7.6.2021)
    A blend of Trebbiano Toscano and Malvasia del Chianti, normally in approximately 50/50 proportions. The grapes are harvested very late and then left to raisinate until the February following the harvest. The dried grapes are pressed and the resulting must is fermented and aged for 8-10 years in 55 and 110-liter oak, cherry wood and chestnut caratelli. 15,5% alcohol.

Medium-deep golden yellow color with an evolved, pale brown hue and a reddish-bronze core. Intense and moderately oxidative nose with complex aromas of chopped nuts, syrupy molasses, some oat biscuits, light sweet notes of lifted VA, a little bit of bitter almond oil, a hint of maple syrup and a touch of vanilla blossom. The wine is quite sweet and very intense on the palate with a full body, moderately sticky mouthfeel and complex flavors of caramel and burnt sugar bitterness, some tangy salinity, light evolved notes of cooked cream, a little bit of almondy nuttiness, a hint of vanilla and a touch of oat biscuits. The high acidity lends great sense of balance to the wine and keeps the sweetness nicely at bay. The high alcohol lends some obvious warmth to the palate. The finish is sweet, moderately sticky and very long with intense flavors of oxidative nuttiness and tangy rancio, some burnt sugar bitterness, light salty notes, a little bit of maple syrup, a sweet hint of vanilla pod and a lifted touch of nail polish VA. The wine ends on a rather hot note, thanks to the high alcohol.

A distinctive, wonderfully complex and very fascinating Vin Santo that shows some oxidative qualities, but also lots of other more fine-tuned nuances as well. The wine isn’t super-sweet in style, nor is it from the drier end of the Vin Santo spectrum, but instead is somewhere in the middle - shows quite a bit of sweetness, but isn’t as rich and sweet as most dessert wines are. The rather high alcohol shows a bit through, making the wine feel a bit hot at times, but other than that, this is just lovely. As it isn’t super-sweet, it drinks really well on its own, but due to its intensity and balanced sweetness, it goes really well with savory desserts. I doubt the wine will continue to improve much from here, but most likely the wine will keep just fine for many years, perhaps even decades. Delightful stuff. (94 pts.)

Posted from CellarTracker

5 Likes

Nice tasting Otto. I had a bottle of the 88 Poggio earlier this year and while it was definitely tired and a bit listless on the palate, it still maintained a fantastic nose.

1 Like

Very precise and interesting …

We had interrogations in 2015 in a Chianti horizontale.

  1. Chianti Classico Riserva : Castello di Monsanto ’’Il Poggio’’ 2010
    (90% Sangiovese, 7% Canaiolo, 3% Colorino) - Barberino Val d’Elsa
    Agriculture raisonnée - élevage 20 mois en barriques et demi-muids français puis 6 mois au moins en bouteilles
    → Some disappointment … closed, mainly blackcurrant … wait another 10 years …

Note that the Castello di Monsanto CC Riserva 50 Vendemmie 2012 and the CC 2013 were not easy to appreciate, this day.

Chianti Classico 2013 :
(90% Sangiovese, 10% Canaiolo) - Barberino Val d’Elsa
Agriculture raisonnée - élevage 12 mois en foudres slovènes puis 3 mois en bouteilles

Chianti Classico Riserva 50 Vendemmie 2012 :
(90% Sangiovese, 10% Canaiolo et Colorino) - Barberino Val d’Elsa
Agriculture raisonnée - élevage 18 mois en barriques et demi-muids français puis 3 mois en bouteilles

About the oldest vintages we had :
Good Castell’In Villa CC 2009
Excellent Castell’In Villa CC Riserva 2009
Castell’In Villa CC Riserva 2008 : corked !

Hi Otto, thanks for great notes Have enjoyed the Monsanto CC and CCR in the past, they are not available her in NZ. I do have two bottles of 2001 CCR though, Sounds like they will probably continue to develop?

cheers Brodie

Always a pleasure to read your notes Otto.

I rather enjoyed opening a 1968 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva for a friend, after he’d visited them and was talking so enthusiastically about seeing their Il Poggio of the same year. That was about 5 years ago. How was the Riserva? Very much alive, though probably past maturity for most palates, sounding not dissimilar to your 1983 Riserva in this tasting.

1 Like

Indeed they will! As long as the provenance is good and the vintage is not lousy, these bottles should keep for decades, easily.

I don’t know if it’s just the sample size, but from my experience, Chianti Classico seems to be the style of Sangiovese that ages at the slowest pace. At least from what I’ve tasted, most Brunellos from the 1980’s are getting a bit iffy and 1960’s/1970’s bottles feel most of the time very tired or just completely dead. Conversely, I’ve had a small number of Chianti Classicos from the 1950’s and 1960’s that have been alive and kicking. I’ve always thought there’s never any hurry with a good CC/CCR.

Any explanation about that ?

Thanks for the notes Otto.

Hooking through the '16 Riserva at home at the moment. Such a great wine and should age for decades.

Cheers
Jeremy

I lovingly carried a bottle of 81 back from Florence a few years ago, which was purchased after I requested the owner of Enoteca Pitti recommend a great aged Sangiovese. It certainly was a revelation and agree with Jeremy that the '16 is top notch. The '15s pretty smart too. And now to keep some for 30 years - that’s going to be a challenge.

Hi Otto, similar experience here. In the last year I have had both he 1990 and 1985 Montesodi Chianti Rufina and both were wonderful. Full of life and fruit and great aged character. So yes I have also found that old Chianti can be amazing. A bit like old Rioja, if they have not overworked the wine, then they have great natural longevity.

Brodie

I’ve had half a case of the 2012 Monsanto CCR during last 18 months and looking at my notes no sign of excessive bitterness. Rather the wines have been just entering the drinking window and in need of plenty of air. Now I sure hope the remaining bottles won’t turn to one :smile:

Well, Chianti Classico seems to have - as Brodie put it - great natural longevity. A combination of high acidity, sufficiently ripe fruit and traditional winemaking (long skin maceration + controlled, gradual oxidation in old botti casks) is always a winning formula for cellarworthy wines.

As for Brunello, I can’t say for sure what gives. Most Brunelli feel like wines that could age as long as any good Chianti, yet still the don’t seem to able to pull it off. I can’t say whether it is because of the climate (warmer temperatures than in Chianti resulting in more ripeness, higher alcohol, lower acidity) or if the winemaking has changed noticeably at some point. One thing that might explain the difference is that most Brunello producers switched to aging their wines in barriques whereas many Chianti producers still seem to favor larger botti. When you take into account that Brunello has to be aged for a minimum of 24 months in oak - no matter if the wine is built for it or not - whereas Chianti Classico must spend only a minimum of 7 months in oak, it might be that some Brunellos get a bit too much oxidative aging during élevage, resulting in wines that are not as ageworthy as they could be.

In a not-at-all-scientific view, I would say that those Brunelli that are aged in old botti are much more ageworthy than those aged in barriques. 2 years in botti gives just a perfect amount of very long, gradual slow-ox for a wine, whereas 2 years in barriques might give the wines a dose slightly too big, unless the wine is of exceptional quality and/or from a great vintage.

Or that’s at least what I think. I welcome any further discussion on the topic - I’d love to hear if somebody has looked into the history of winemaking in Chianti vs. Brunello in detail and why Chiantis seem more ageworthy than Brunellos - even if the latter ones often appear stylistically much more impressive and seem to show much more aging potential in their youth compared to similarly aged CCs.

Thanks,

Complex oenological and anthropological issues (for nebbiolo too) … we tried to address them in the reports we wrote in 2015 (Chianti, different styles and different areas of production - the tasting, to be short, showed many very austere wines - local landscapes, local people and local history of taste) and 2017 (Montalcino).

Generalisations can be problematic, after all Biondi-Santi were as long lasting as any wines of the region, with the owner aspiring to wines that could live a century. That said I don’t disagree with those finding Brunello wines (too often) rather shorter lived than their prestige position would otherwise imply.

Personally I’ve tended towards Vino Nobile di Montepulciano as wines I’ve actively sought for the cellar, though Chianti has done very well by me as well (I think I was lucky in the producers I originally landed upon, but there are plenty of other interesting wines). I’ve even preferred Emilian-Romagnan sangiovese wines to Brunello, with even the fancy ones coming in at the price of a cheap Brunello. There however is rather a lot of simple table wine sangiovese in that region, which doesn’t help alert the wine world to the relatively few producers that might excite forumites.

Indeed there are some exceptional Sangiovese wines made in Emilia-Romagna (which are not the same Sangiovese as the clones grown in Tuscany, as they have their own local Sangiovese clone - which is often described as superior to the Tuscan clones), but the problem is that a lot of uninteresting swill is also made there and there is very little knowledge around on Emilia-Romagna wines, so one can have a hard time knowing which wines are good and which should be avoided.

I really can’t comment much on Vino Nobile, since I have very little experience on any aged examples. My biggest beef with the region is that many producers have hopped on the modernist bandwagon, so a majority of contemporary Vino Nobile tends to be stylistically rather heavily oaked and many producers include international grape varieties in their wines (I really can’t understand how the consorzio allows up to 30% of varieties like Cabernet Sauvignon or Merlot in a Vino Nobile), which tends to take the wine away from the direction I enjoy.

I think I must be lucky with the VNdiM producers I’ve bought from, as whilst most have now moved away from the traditional ‘*behemoth’ sized barrels seen on winery tours, the ones I’ve latched onto seemed happy with botti, rather than tonneux or barriques. That said, it’s now 11 years since we visited the region, so who knows what has changed.

I’ve no idea what the official name is, but they are fcking huge.

Botti as well. They range from small ones, around 1000 liters, to huge, +15000-liter casks.

The dozen or so 10000-liter botti at Travaglini in Gattinara were quite a marvel.

1 Like

Thanks Otto, very interesting! I have little experience with Castello di Monsanto but was surprised of how well Chianti from the Classico area ages by tasting several San Felice Riservas from the early 80ies

Thanks for the notes!! We had a 2000 Castello di Monsanto Chianti Classico Riserva Il Poggio a couple months ago and it was exceptional. Really tested my loyalty to Felsina Rancia.