Sat down with a buddy of mine today to catch up and down a couple of white burgs. Pretty interesting to compare wines from the same village and vintage, although I guess the differences might be due to both the origins of the grapes and the winemaking. The Sauzet definitely showed a lot more oak influence than the Carillon, which according to the Internets only sees 15% of new oak. I struggle to praise the latter’s value at 50 € a bottle but whatta heck, it definitely delivered bang for the buck.
-
2017 Domaine Jacques Carillon Puligny-Montrachet - France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Puligny-Montrachet (3.7.2020)
Very elegant, somewhat understated on the nose with tangy lemon and lime fruit, attractive greener fruit tones, faint nuttiness, complex spiciness and some smoke. Shows some reduction which feels like a stylistic choice - awesome. On the palate it coats the palate in a fantastic fashion yet is nervous and linear with great acidic backbone and a chiselled form. Super energetic with bright green fruits and a wonderful minerally twang, finishing pleasantly tangy. I think this is a great, very well made wine for its level that exudes purity. A delight to drink already. -
2017 Etienne Sauzet Puligny-Montrachet 1er Cru La Garenne - France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Puligny-Montrachet 1er Cru (3.7.2020)
Generous and expressive on the nose with creamy, nutty, smoky and buttery/malo notes. Quite an extravagant expression, although not over the top by any means. The lemon and apricot driven fruit sits comfortably in the back. On the palate it is rich and big with relatively high ripeness, yet again not overblown, with easily sufficient acidity. A powerhouse that seems tightly wound at this point - drinkable and food friendly but not all that open. I find that there is a lot to like here but the comparison (Jacques Carillon village Puligny 2017) is just so much more open right now. I am sure this will cellar well (with the usual caveat).
Posted from CellarTracker