
Alternated tasting the 2015s, never made it to the 2004.
Ferrington: Opened and ran around the house for a few minutes and when I came back, perfume in the room.
My wife declared, “Framboise!!”
If anyone ever needs to know what the platonic nose of the grape is, this is your bottle.
Bright light purple edges in the glass and a sensation of “pure fruit” when tasting. It gives form to the old saying, “I let the grapes speak for themselves.”
It has upper medium acidity that makes the fruit pop, but it’s not a fruit bomb and doesn’t come across as over-extracted. It has a top palate light sour cherry sensation and a longish finish that is a prototype for saying “red berries.”
My wife summed it up: “Very good pinot.”
Nanny and my niece were mainly interested in whether or not there was more! ![cheers [cheers.gif]](/uploads/db3686/original/2X/0/0ff9bfcdb0964982cd3240b6159868fbdf215b1a.gif)
_
The Coastlands was a wine of a different color, more like an ink. It had more “body,” with darker flavors…dark berries vs. Ferrington’s red.
Perhaps there was a touch of CO2 ‘spritz,’ but that quickly dissipated.
It had pomegranite and maybe a teeeny bit of cranberry. It evolved more over time than the Ferrington, maybe having some ‘leafy’ characteristics, as well.
The two were different enough that it was hard to think about tasting and not “choose one.”
This wine reminded me a great deal of the SV Rochioli pinots. I think you could sneak it into a Rochioli line up and pull it off.
So, this was the more brooding of the two. The Ferrington was the bon vivant.
Brig, thanks for starting this thread. I wouldn’t have thought to Pobega these and I am glad I did.
(The Ferrington hurt because I only had 2, the Coastlands was less painful, I have two left.)