When the first snow hits, you know its time for our blind tasting group’s annual check on the new red Burgundy vintage.
A few general points on this tasting. First, while our expenditure on this tasting has risen over the years, it hasn’t kept up with Burg-flation. So a few years ago there might have been a Roumier Bussiere in the mix, the last two years we had Lafarge, and now we’re down to Guillemot. So this tasting is really more of a “how this vintage compares to other vintages, if you’re spending $75 for your average bottle this year and spent $60 for the 2005s”, rather than a comparison within producers. For all I know, Roumier Bussiere is amazing this year, but it had better be.
Second, the tasting is single blind with no discussion permitted before ranking. This format leads to a LOT of variance in rankings, so any group conclusions other than maybe the top bottle or two, the bottom bottle or two, and a big cluster in the middle should be taken with a big grain of salt. We also have varying palates in the room, some folks who like their wines bigger and some who like their wines leaner, and the group rankings represent a (sometimes awkward) consensus.
Now, some points specific to me - I like my burgs with red fruit, minimal stems, and I don’t mind judicious low char oak. I hate reduction, high char oak, I dislike dark fruit, and I have a low brett tolerance. My subjective burg preferences are strong enough to outweigh normative difference, so I don’t warrant my notes as remotely objective.
General thoughts on the tasting: Hugely disappointing. This tasting should have some of my favorite wines of the year, since you can get me to giggle over the right Bourgogne, and these aren’t Bourgognes. It was still my favorite tasting - Burgundy is so interesting, but I didn’t think the wines were that good. I was reminded strongly of the 2008s for some of these wines - juicy and lively, but also a bit hollow. Some of the more experienced (read older) tasters in the room brought up the 1999s because of the ripeness of the fruit - these were, after all, fruity and approachable. Regardless, these aren’t close to the 2009s and 2010s, and while you have plenty of total duds in 2011 that are worse than any wine on this table, the 2011s that got ripe have more substance, IMO. Also, while I normally recoil from stems like they’re radioactive (and my number 1 wine was 100% destemmed, as per usual), I didn’t mind the stems nearly as much as usual in this vintage. They’re not as green as they can be - more juniper / pepper than green bean. Some of the stemmed wines were among my favorites, which rarely happens.
Anyways, onto the wines. Notes are from when the wines were blind, except when obviously colored by the reveal:
Group’s 8th, my 5th:
2012 David Duband Morey St. Denis 1er Cru Clos Sorbé - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Morey St. Denis 1er Cru (12/11/2014)
Stems here - there’s that juniper again. Mixed red and dark fruit - more red on the nose, more dark on the palate. Oddly bitter/extracted and shows some heat, even though it’s a light-bodied wine. Not bad, but the winemaking here is weird. (85 pts.)
Group’s 7th, my 2nd:
2012 Domaine Pierre Guillemot Savigny-lès-Beaune 1er Cru Narbantons - France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Savigny-lès-Beaune 1er Cru (12/11/2014)
Divisive - the folks who like feminine burgs were big on this, the folks who like their burgs bigger strongly disliked. Very pretty red fruit / juniper / sichuan pepper / flowers nose, nice use of stems. Palate not concentrated, but seamless - not as hollow as most wines tonight - and a nice mix of red fruit and a saltiness. Just a kiss of light tannin on the finish but this is structured more by acid. Pretty obvious as CdB blind, but I like wines from the CdB. (90 pts.)
Group’s 6th, my 7th:
2012 Domaine de L’Arlot Nuits St. Georges 1er Cru Clos des Forêts St. Georges - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Nuits St. Georges 1er Cru (12/11/2014)
Weird. Dark, even maybe a touch bretty. Loads of volatility and dark, meaty, prune/plum fruit, but also a stem character? In the mouth, overripe fruit, but hollow and juicy. There’s also oak here. Finished bitter. A mess for my palate, but I’ve never liked this producer. Reminds me of the 2008s that didn’t work. (82 pts.)
Group’s 5th, my 8th:
2012 Domaine Francois Lamarche Echezeaux - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Echezeaux Grand Cru (12/11/2014)
Reduction and high char oak. Smoke, coffee and rubber. Concentrated and tannic - obviously one of our expensive bottles. I hate this style of burg. Consistent with other bottles I’ve had from this producer in other vintages. Divisive - the folks who like their burgs bigger liked this wine. Not for me. (80 pts.)
Group’s 4th, my 3rd:
2012 Domaine Jean Tardy et Fils Vosne-Romanée Les Vigneaux - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Vosne-Romanée (12/11/2014)
Nice, if somewhat uncharacteristic nose of herbs, mixed red and dark fruit, touch of anise. Almost like a Burgundian wine from Provence. But really good palate; layers of red fruit accented with something darker, a bit of oak fills out the midpalate. Doesn’t have the over extracted bitterness of some of the other wines. Not super complex but I like this a lot. Not really characteristic of Vosne at all, though! (88 pts.)
Group’s 3rd, my 4th:
2012 Domaine Duroche Gevrey-Chambertin 1er Cru Lavaux St. Jacques - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Gevrey-Chambertin 1er Cru (12/11/2014)
Another good experience from this underrated producer. The nose starts off problematic, with a medicinal, cough syrup cherry aspect, but settles down with time into something more pure and red. Juniper - some stems here, but just a touch. Nice and long in the mouth; a touch hollow and 2008y in midpalate but this seems more substantial than many of the other wines tonight, and not at the expense of any overextraction. Nice use of low char oak to buffer the juiciness a touch. (88 pts.)
Group’s 2nd, my 6th:
2012 Domaine Joliet Fixin 1er Cru Clos de la Perrière - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Fixin 1er Cru #12/11/2014#
You don’t turn around a vineyard overnight. Very juicy/crunchy fruit, sort of a stewed cranberry thing going on. Green, spicy nose - first wine that shows real green. Hollow and short and sharp. OK quaffer but where is the substance? Very 2008y. (84 pts.)
[NB - I found the group’s ranking of this wine mystifying; not like the Arlot where I could understand that if you want something big and dark, you might dig it.]
Group’s 1st, my 1st:
2012 Domaine Hudelot-Baillet Chambolle-Musigny 1er Cru Les Cras - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Chambolle-Musigny 1er Cru (12/11/2014)
Lovely wine. Red fruit, flowers, low char oak, no stems. Layered and full in the mouth despite good acid. The oak covered up the hollowness. Ripe and long, yet feminine. Mineral finish. No bitterness. Gorgeous. Presses all of my burg buttons. (91 pts.)
Then, I blinded the group with a bottle that I expected to show very well in this company. It did.
2013 Littorai Pinot Noir Les Larmes - USA, California, North Coast, Anderson Valley (12/11/2014)
Spectacular bottle for this level. Not blind to me, as I brought it as a ringer to a 2012 burg tasting. IMO, despite being one of the less expensive wines on the table, it was the best. A turn riper and sweeter than the burgs - but not out of place - with pure red fruit, loads of florals, and great concentration for such a light bodied wine. Lively acid - even a prickle of petillant? Very similar to a top notch 2009 burg. Can’t wait to see how this ages. Best Littorai Larmes I’ve ever had. (91 pts.)
Finally, perhaps to wash the taste out, Corey and I went out afterwards and had a proper Burgundy.
2000 Domaine Dujac Clos St. Denis - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Clos St. Denis Grand Cru (12/11/2014)
A touch of brett brings this down a notch. When first opened this was very good but not great - a touch soft and short and dominated by brett. But with an hour or two in a decanter, it improved significantly. Ripeish plum and red cherry fruit, mint, well integrated stems and low char oak. A very Vosne like Asian spice thing. With air, more fruit and a real peacock tail in the back. Very fine, ripe tannin. Just a touch short - the amazing GCs have more power. And, of course, the brett. Reminded me of top notch Loire CF. Nice to have a classy burg - the difference is obvious. (92 pts.)