TN: 1969 Louis Martini, Mountain Pinot Noir. 'Totally Redeemed Myself '

After a doubly-disappointing effort last night (0-2 Last Night. 1976 Mayacamas LH Zin and 1973 Ridge Geyserville) i was bound and determined to open something awesome today to properly celebrate my biz win from Friday. Louis Martini to the rescue!

The cork was in perfect shape and it poured a beautiful ruby red color with a killer nose of roses, cinnamon, and autumn leaves. In the mouth this was just lovely with notes of florals, earthy red fruits, and a long, acid-filled finish. Medium bodied and just an absolute pleasure to drink. Feels good to totally redeem myself from yesterday (insert Step Brothers quotes here :wink: )





28 Likes

Beauty! The back label says vineyards “north of San Francisco”. That covers a lot of territory. Have to wonder where it was grown. I don’t think there was a lot of Pinot Noir anywhere in California back then.

1 Like

Thanks Dan! And I was wondering the same thing. Hopefully someone here has an idea and can chime in :cheers:

John Winthrop Haeger’s North American Pinot Noir says that Martini’s PN plantings (1946-) were originally on the Stanly Ranch property in Carneros, which seems to have been just west of the Napa River and north of the marshes. Not much of a “mountain,” so maybe they’d expanded west or north by the 60s?

3 Likes

Damn, that is a beautiful looking wine for a 1969 vintage!

2 Likes

1 Like

Carneros would make sense.

In 1962 I learned from Louis Martini Mountain Red that wine was my beverage of choice. I think that Louis Martini might have been using the term ‘Mountain’ loosely. But hopefully if other vineyards were involved somebody can let us know.

2 Likes

Yes, it was almost certainly from Carneros and “Mountain” didn’t mean anything literal.

-Al

1 Like

I had a 1976 Louis Martini Pinot Noir Special Selection back in 1985 that was pretty good, apparently cost $5 at the time.

-Al

1 Like

I think Stanly Ranch is the most likely, the did have some Pinot planted off of West Side road also but not much.

1 Like

Ahhh, very interesting Patchen! Thank you so much!!

1 Like

Right! Im telling you, so many of these older Louis Martini wines seem to be almost bulletproof. Either that or i just get really lucky with them :cheers:

It’s a hotel now.

1 Like

Louis P has a quote something like - that they generally consider the north counties “Mountainous” but he does’t know what the word truly means because some of those grapes are from higher elevation valleys etc.

1 Like

An Auberge resort, no less! But looks like there’s at least some part of the property that’s still under vine: Abiouness Wines | Stanly Ranch

2 Likes

Louis Martini pioneered both the Monte Rosso Vineyard which straddles Sonoma and Napa and also the Carneros district. Easier for them to just print “North of San Francisco” back then when they were just backwater places.

1 Like

Along with probably many others here, I cut my wine baby teeth on Louis Martini wines of that era. Thanks for the writeup and bringing back some memories, Rich.

1 Like

That vineyard was pretty well established and well known by the time Martini came along, Mt Pisgah/ Goldstein Ranch had been around since the 1890’s.

A few notes from the Martinis I found about those Pinot Vineyards -
LOUIS M- In 1943 we bought about 250 acres in Napa, near Carneros,* and my son has bought 140 acres, all Pinot,** about four miles from there on Los Amigos Road. We have approximately 110 acres of Pinot there, 100 acres of Zinfandel, 90 acres of Cabernet, and the balance Chardonnay, Traminer, some white (Johannisberg) Riesling and Chenin blanc. The grapes are good.

LOUIS P - The rest is just mountain pasture. Then just last year I guess, '72, we bought an additional 80 acres next to the original 60 in the Carneros district so we now have 140 acres down there. That’s going to be all Pinot noir.

LOUIS P - Well, we make it as heavy as we can make Pinot noir; it’s never going to turn out as heavy as some of the other varieties, but we do try to make it medium- to heavy-bodied. We really don’t make any wines with these exceptionally heavy, inky characters; we try and keep away from that.

4 Likes

Wow! I am gobsmacked!! I would love to read more if you can share the source of these notes.

Such big holdings in such fabulous sites.

The comments about “as heavy as we can make Pinot noir” bring back memories.

Decades ago, I put together a tasting and dinner for Jim Pedroncelli and Robert Parker. The tasting was focused on Cabernet, but after we went through them, Jim opened a range of Pinot Noir vintages. They were all inky black, tannic as hell and completely devoid of Pinot character. Bob said essentially “WTF?”. Jim explained that the law required 51% of the varietal, and to make the wine suitable for their clientele, the other 49% was Petite Sirah.

10 Likes