The Soulful Art of Barolo: Cappellano (long)

Last week, I was happy to sit with a group of die-hard Barolo lovers and friends in what has become one of the greatest tasting groups I have ever had the honor of being a part of. Created on the message boards of Vinous (Antonio Galloni’s own website), this group has become a force to be reckoned with, as each member is a long-time collector and passionate Barolo lover. With each tasting we seem to reach a new high, and this week’s focus was the cult producer Cappellano.
All of my notes are supplied below, however if you’d like to read more and see many more pictures, please visit my blog at: The Cellar Table.
Cappellano lineup sm.jpg
Cappellano is one of the greatest producers in all of Barolo, and they’ve never received a 100, 95 or even a 90-point score from any modern-day Italian wine critic. The decision to reject the scoring of critics came from Teobaldo Cappellano in 1983, who believed winemaking a be an art form, a work of passion, and one that should not be encapsulated into a single number. Nor did he believe that it was healthy for fellow producers, seeing it as being divisive. Whether or not you or I agree with this philosophy is beside the point, simply because Cappellano has been making some of the best Barolo in the region for decades.

As for the wines, I have decided not to provide scores, but I am happy to supply a number of impressions beyond my tasting notes below. Firstly, my personal preference for sheer enjoyment factor leans toward Pie Rupestris, which is great news for myself and anyone that follows my palate, as the wines are more affordable and easier to find. Second is Cappellano’s ability to make great wines in poorer and warmer vintages, such as the ’95, ’97, ’00, ’03 and ’07. Third, that the Pie Franco displays more dark Serralunga character, while the Pie Rupestris is a wine of lifted, pure fruit and vibrancy. Lastly, that these are wines that are deceptively petite at times, yet mature into gorgeous examples of classic Barolo.
On to the wines (In the order they were tasted):

1964 Cappellano Barolo – This was absolutely magnificent. The nose alone was spellbinding in a way that only perfectly mature Barolo can be. This is one of those wines that converts you into a collector and prompts you to begin building a cellar to house a collection that may one day evolve into such gorgeous bottles of Barolo. The bouquet was exuberant and lively, showing dried cherries, hints of dusty spice, dried leaves, cedar and floral tones. On the palate, it was still lively and fresh with rich cherry and plum fruit, lifted by zest acidity and revealing hints of orange peel and minerality. An inner sweetness resonated on the finish with lingering dried fruit tones.

1971 Cappellano Barolo – The ’71 displayed a dark, haunting and perfumed bouquet of dried flowers, cherry, savory herbs, chalky minerals and spice. The depths this reached on the nose were worth the experience alone, which distracted me from its slightly disappointing performance on the palate. Notes of dried cherry, citrus rind and minerals made an appearance but with a lack of flesh, resulting in a hollow sensation. Dried-out red fruit lingered on the finish—but oh, what an incredible bouquet…

1995 Cappellano Barolo Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – The nose was highly expressive and pretty with sweet cherries, spice and vibrant floral tones. On the palate, it displayed silky textures and perfectly resolved tannin, showing ripe raspberry fruit, along with spice and tart apple. A bump of acidity provided vibrancy going into the finish with notes of orange peel, spice and lingering hard red candy. This is easily one of the best ’95 Barolos I’ve ever tasted.

1996 Cappellano Barbaresco – I’ve had the pleasure of tasting this twice this year, and both times it was truly stunning, but tonight there was a vibrancy that the last bottle lacked. The nose was alive with dark, ripe red fruits, dusty spice, undergrowth, fresh pine and hints of cedar. On the palate, I found alluring dark ripe fruit, silky textures, and stunning inner floral tones. It lasted long on the finish, displaying a juicy, dark and ripe fruit profile.

1996 Cappellano Barolo Piè Franco Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – The nose was dark and brooding, showing off its Serralunga roots with a mix of dark soil, iron, and dark red fruits. On the palate, rich dark red fruits flooded the senses, which were quickly assaulted by gripping tannin followed by minerals and earth tones. Its structure lingered long on the finish along with hints of drying red berry and leather.

1997 Cappellano Barolo Piè Franco Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – The bouquet showed minerality up front, followed by tart red berry, dusty soil tones and crushed leaves. On the palate is where the ’97 Franco shined, as ripe, dark red fruits were carried by a mix of silky textures and vibrant acidity, with hints of brown spice and sweet inner floral tones. The finish was shorter than desired, turning more to unresolved tannin and dried red fruit. Still, this is a highly enjoyable wine.

1997 Cappellano Barolo Piè Rupestris Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – The ’97 Pie Rupestris is everything we ever hoped the ’97 vintage would deliver—but didn’t. Here I found a rich, warm and inviting wine that was perfectly balanced and ready to drink. The nose displayed ripe black cherry, pretty floral tones, brown spice, minerals, dusty soil and undergrowth. It was silky-smooth on the palate, displaying spiced cherry, plum, inner floral tones and hints of contrasting tannin. The finish left nothing to be desired, as fine tannin faded to reveal dark red fruit, spiced orange and inner floral tones. I honestly don’t remember the last time I enjoyed a ’97 Barolo this much.

2000 Cappellano Barolo Piè Rupestris Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – In the context of the evening, the 2000 Pie Rupestris didn’t stand out much, but considering the competition, it isn’t hard to see why. Here I found a dark red fruit profile, along with sweet floral tones, plum, dusty spice and minerals. It was rich on the palate yet balanced throughout, with soft red fruits that seemed to saturate the senses. It’s a fun wine, very pretty and quite good for the vintage.

2001 Cappellano Barolo Piè Rupestris Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – The nose displayed airy and lifted red fruit with notes of dusty spice, menthol and licorice wrapped firmly around a mineral core. On the palate, it displayed radiant cherry and pomegranate with hints of spice and firm ’01 tannins, which provided a saturating and concentrated fruit sensation along with grip to spare. The finish resonated on fine tannin and lingering dried cherry and sweet herbs.

2003 Cappellano Barolo Piè Franco Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – The nose was dark and almost savory with ripe red fruits, plum, raw meat and brown spice. On the palate, it displayed soft textures with sweet red berries, spice and a hint of green apple, which lent energy to an otherwise bruiser of a wine. A hint of heat was noticeable on the finish but only slightly so. It really is a great wine for the warm vintage, with excellent balance and perfectly contrasting acidity.

2007 Cappellano Barolo Piè Rupestris Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) - This was another great example of Cappellano’s ability to make amazingly balanced wine in warmer vintages. The nose was spicy, sweet and beautifully perfumed with ripe red fruits and floral tones. Nowhere did I find any baked qualities or heat, just pure finesse. On the palate, I found intense red fruits and spice, which seemed to saturate the senses, with a bump of brisk acidity toward the close that made the mouth water.

2008 Cappellano Barolo Piè Franco Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – The nose was gorgeous with savory herbs giving way to black cherry, plum, undergrowth and dark floral tones. There was a cool and crisp quality here that was quite attractive as it continued to become fleshier and more expressive in the glass. On the palate, I found silky textures offset by brisk acidity with rich black cherry, sweet inner floral tones and hints of undergrowth. The finish lent a slight green stem note but resonated on red fruit and fine tannin. This is a drop-dead gorgeous wine.

2008 Cappellano Barolo Piè Rupestris Otin Fiorin (Gabutti) – Stunning, simply stated. The 2008 Pie Rupestris displayed a deep and rich balsamic note that was offset by cool-toned red fruits and floral notes, which presented radiance that was undeniably attractive. Its brilliant and lifted character continued on the palate, as pure red fruit and sweet spice gave way to pretty inner floral tones in a palate-filling expression with fine tannin adding grip. Balance is the key here from start to finish.

In closing, these are wines to buy in every vintage, assuming you can find them. While buying a wine without the safety net of a score and be difficult (especially in this price range), I can assure you that Cappellano is worth the hunt. I would be happy to taste any single one of these over and over again. These are wines of soul, passion and purity.

Eric - terrific notes and I enjoyed the informative color commentary on your blog. Thanks so much for sharing.

Thanks Rich, I tried to be as expressive as possible on these notes since I wasn’t posting scores.

Eric,

Thanks for posting the notes. Great photos!

I loved the '71 Barolo – the nose was fantastic. The '64 was great, too, a little better on the palate than the '71, but not as expressive in the nose. My favorite of the night for current drinking was the '97 Rupestris. The Pie Franco’s were all good, but I think they’re still too young. Both 2008’s were really good as well – I’m loving that vintage actually.

I did not find the 2003 to be roasted at all, though it showed some heat on the finish. I would definitely buy the 2003 at the right price, unlike some other '03 Barolo and Barbaresco.

The rest of the flights were very solid, though tighter. I was impressed by the consistency of the wine across vintages – both in terms of style and quality. There were no truly inferior wines of the group (except the corked '07 Franco).

All in all, I think the best vintages of G. Rinaldi that I tasted at a recent dinner were better than the best of Cappellano – though the comparison isn’t exactly fair since we didn’t have a '99 Cappellano and the '99 Brunate Le Coste was the WOTN of the Rinaldi dinner.

I would be thrilled to have Cappellano in my cellar. I only have '08 and '10 Pie Rupestris, but it seems like those are two good wines to have.

I agree on all counts Ben. Unfortunately, I was late to the game with Cappellano, and so I foresee many years of paying through the nose to build a back vintage collection. The 2008’s were so beautiful and still in the market, and so that’s where I start. Hopefully I’ll find some 2010’s at an okay price as well. I must say that the G. Rinaldi’s were a step up, but such a small step, and it would be interesting to compare.

This might seem trivial in the context of the wines being discussed here, but in addition to their (obviously) amazing Barolos, I’ve always thought their Barolo Chinato was unbelievably good. It is exponentially better than any other I have ever tasted.

I like the title : Soulful Art of Barolo !

So in a way for die-hard Barolo lovers, wine ( or Barolo ) is an art… [stirthepothal.gif]

Not sure if I’ve had the Cappellano Barolo Chinato, but every other Barolo Chinato I’ve had was yucky, to use a technical term.

Cappellano invented Chinato. Dr. Giuseppe Cappellano to be specific. He was a pharmacist. Chinato is an acquired taste, which I have yet to acquire.

I agree 100%. I love it as an after dinner wine that really wow’s guests. Confectionary spice and not too sweet. Plus I love the bitter twang on the finish.

Not even Cappellano Ken? I actually enjoy it quite a bit.

Eric, what was the decanting and aeration regimen for these wines? Cappellano made some of the most powerful and longest-lived of all Baroli, and given that we are talking Serralunga fruit and, in the case of the Francos, Michet clone fruit and relative youth as well, that is saying something. I recently served a 1978 Cappellano Barolo, and while it showed well after around 6 hours in decanter, it did not really begin to blossom and offer the characteristic cinnamon/spice note until the 8-hour mark, and I think that 12 hours would have been optimal.

Thanks for the soulful notes.
Did you or others taste the 2009 Rupestris ?

Claus, have gone through half a case of the 09 Rupetris. It needs some air before it shows the potential but I’ll leave my last half case to enjoy over the next 15 years. It do show the heat of the vintage but also have the backbone and structure to age for at least 15 years, of course depending on how mature you prefer your nebbiolo.

Thanks Martin
Between 5 and 57 years.
New paradigm notwithstanding.
Glædelig jul!

I’ll try to get you the hard details, but for the most part, everyone opened them in the AM to decant off sediment and then back into bottle for slow-o.

I don’t intend this as a criticism (or at least not an acute one). I enjoyed Eric’s write-up. But I wish people would up-front their opening/decanting regimen. Particularly with Barolo, it makes a huge difference. I might go so far as to say that tasting notes of Barolo without noting when the bottles were opened and how they were treated are largely useless to people trying to decide when/how to open their bottles of the same wines.

To use an extreme example, a friend just getting into Barolo recently opened a 1978 Cavallotto Bricco Boschis San Giuseppe (which I have also had) and noted that the wine was thin, lacked aromatics other than some VA, and was devoid of fruit. When I asked him whether he decanted it, he told me that he popped and poured it for guests and that no one tasted it more than about 45 minutes after opening. I strongly suspect that the bottle would have looked, smelled, and tasted much different had it been decanted for 6 hours.

Fantastic post - many thanks. I’m just beginning to explore Barolo - Cappellano is definitely going on my list!

Some Baroli requires 24 hours or even more with increased air-exposed surface

Great notes, thanks very much. One of the threads of the year, absolutely, given the scarcity of these bottles. Cappellano, Rinaldi, B. Mascarello, Giacosa, G. Conterno. Could really just stop there in Barolo and be happy!