The Future of Aussie Wines by Dr. J

Powerful stuff…many good points, but, unfortunately many missed points as well

In January 2009 there is a perception that the American market for Australian wine is in serious jeopardy. In upscale wine shops, shelf space for premium Australia wines continues to shrink. On fine dining restaurant wine lists Australian wines have very little representation. Ask collector/connoisseurs what they are buying and the chances are overwhelming that they will not name Australian wines. Closeout offers from distributors and retailers abound (creating shopping opportunities for loyal fans of the wines but making it very difficult to maintain pricing or demand for new vintages). In my tastings for this report, many, if not most, of the importers with whom I sat down have trimmed their portfolios and/or begun to diversify into what they perceive as more fertile ground, particularly Spain and Argentina. In not much more than a decade the market has gone from boom to bust and to an unsettled future.

First, a look at the numbers and what they tell us. For the year to date through October 2008, total volume shipped to the USA by the top ten exporting countries has declined by 7.5% with France (-12.9%) and Australia (-11.7%) suffering the largest decreases. Breaking the numbers down further, through the end of November Australia had exported 22 million cases to the USA, 18.3 million under $10 a bottle, 2.1 million from $10-15, 640,000 cases from $15-20, and 386,000 cases over $20. The under $10 category represents double digit growth; the over $20 category close to a 50% decrease. The numbers seem to support the old retail adage that when times are tough people don’t drink less, they drink cheaper. However, the decline in the over $20 category predates our economic crisis by several years. There is no question that our economy has exacerbated the problem but is not the cause.

I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of readers of Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate are indifferent about the so-called “Critter” wines selling in the under $10 price category. Even though the category seems to be expanding, it has had an overall negative impact on the perception of Australian wine quality. Much of this insipid bulk wine has turned off aspiring fine wine drinkers to Brand Australia making it difficult to move them up the quality totem pole because they have already drunk from the tainted well. In contrast, imports of Argentina wine have been booming and I would assert that a principal reason is that the equivalent to “Critter” wines in Argentina are consumed internally while the entry level of imported Argentina wine is qualitatively far higher than that from Australia. It thus becomes a much easier task to convert new fine wine drinkers to upscale Argentina wines because their entry level experiences have generally been much more positive.

This still begs the question of why the over $20 category has taken such a hit. One prominent importer whose opinion I respect told me, “The market got bored – plain and simple. There was no excitement in the category and that which was there was artificial (designer brands with no real core values – no bricks and mortar, no faces and places behind them, no regional expressions) ¼ The cool regional expression of Australia along with its smorgasbord of styles and romantic stories became a surreal expression of corporate dominance and Frankenstein-like expressionism. When anything becomes predictable to the customer it becomes boring and they move on. ¼ Bring back the romance and tell new stories and they’ll come back.” Another importer told me, “This year quite a few mainstream publications [have been] predicting the implosion of the Aussie category, bemoaning that everything tasted the same, too alcoholic, too many cutesy labels hiding inferior wine, etc. Well, there was some truth there, as we’ve seen a lot of Johnny Come Latelys jumping on the success of the Aussie category over the last decade. And they come from all walks of life – quick buck Australian investment schemes encouraging the planting of vast vineyards in the wrong areas of Australia (and the wrong varieties for the region), Collins Street (the equivalent of Wall Street) “farmers” throwing mounds of cash at wineries trying to emulate the styles that The Wine Advocate championed in the early ‘00s, and US importers who decided that they should get into Australia because it seemed like the hot trend¼There will certainly be a purging of this type of behavior in the current economic climate.” He adds, “2008 will go down as one of those years that ‘what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.’” His solutions: 1) Continue to import and promote the best of Australia’s wine regions from coast to coast. 2) Continue to educate and show Australia’s regionality to retailers and sommeliers. 3) Importers need to stick to their guns and not dump brands because of tough times. Another respected importer states, “If the [wine] trade doesn’t know Southeast Australia from Margaret River, we will not be able to bring forward these excellent values. If the trade believes that Australia is made up of wines under $8 and over $50, we will never be able to build the quality/value pyramid.” He concludes, “The good news is that we know Australia produces great wine in spite of its lackluster representation in stores and restaurants. One day we will see stores setting their Australian wines by appellation as we do France.” One can only hope so.

There is no question that at the upper end of the market Shiraz has become the grape and Barossa and McLaren Vale the regions. If consumers know more than that, they qualify as experts. How many people know that in these regions Grenache, Cabernet, and Riesling excel? How many people are aware that superb Pinot Noir and Chardonnay grow in Mornington Peninsula and Yarra Valley? Or Shiraz in Heathcote? My eyes were opened when I visited in September 2008 and did some tasting. Yet it appears that a good many American importers stopped their searching at the borders of Barossa and McLaren Vale. In retrospect it appears that the Australian wine market over the past 10-12 years has had many of the characteristics of the bubble phenomena of high-tech stocks and real estate. When the category got hot (and for this Dan Philips of The Grateful Palate has to get much of the credit) other importers rushed to Australia (especially to Barossa and McLaren Vale) and bought indiscriminately, ultimately flooding the market with the kinds of high alcohol, no terroir, and manufactured wines that have turned consumers off. Now the bubble has burst and what’s left are those very wines that excited people in the first place. However, now they need to be reintroduced with much better marketing behind them. And consumers need to be educated to the fact that Australia is a diverse country with a huge variety of regions, wines, and styles. As the following notes should make clear, the wines of Australia are as good as they have ever been and are worthy of support.

—Jay Miller

Great read, thanks for posting it.

I used to buy a lot of great Australian wines back in mid '90s, but was turned off to them for the reasons pointed out. Looks like I wasn’t alone.

Recently I had the 2006 Marquis Phillips Shiraz [made by Chris Ringland?] and was surprised at how much I liked it.

There was just a touch of oak, but lots of nice fruit and [by the standards of the price range] a certain elegance to it.

And this was in the company of Pineau D’Aunis, Poulsard, and Gamay.

On the other hand, late last year [2008] I opened a 1998 Parker Coonawarra First Growth [which we had been patiently cellaring for the better part of a decade], and was shocked at how awful it was: Just a mess of oak and acid and FD&C Red #3 dreck.

No tannins, no mouthfeel, no aromatics, no fruit, no nothing.

I would say “insipid”, but the oak & acid were so strong that it really was an offensive little wine.

Ugh - and that was maybe $75, back in the day, with major points from somebody.

With the $20 threshold being the break point, I find most wine below it to be boring and monotone fruit bombs, but what’s worse is the number of Aussie reds above that $20 line that aren’t any better. We’ve seen some prices roll back, the examples foremost in my mind are Lehman’s Clancy’s Gold and more recently Henry’s Drive Dead Letter Office, but my perception of late is that I have to spend some more serious $$$ to get something fairly interesting to drink.

Standouts at this time for me are Two Hands and d’Arenberg.

By the way, if anyone knows him, then could you ask Ben Hammerschlag why he thinks that Dan Standish’s wines should suddenly be offered at the $125+ pricepoint?

And could you also ask Hammerschlag how much of that money is making its way back to Standish?

Or maybe you should ask Standish himself…

I first got into these wines with the '98 vintage through the Grateful Palate offerings. At the time agebility to me didn’t really matter per se, because I liked the wines when they were young. That said, I did try the last I had of this era ('98 Fox Creek JSM) last year, and it had aged perfectly and was flat-out delicious.

I never really bought that many Aussies in the first place, and I stopped with the '02 vintage, and haven’t bought anything since - primarily because to me they did all seem to be cut from the same cloth, the prices weren’t any bargain to boot, plus I was getting into Pinot, God help me.

'98 Fox Creek JSM

that was still Sarah and Sparky no?..

you betcha!

Why?

When Dan Phillips started the Grateful Palate, he lived across the street from our store. He had previously sold us wines for years from another distributor and we were friends. As a courtesy to Dan, we tasted through the entire line up of GP wines (this is well over ten years ago) and took a selection of things we thought might appeal to our clientele and offered them at VERY competitive pricing. Many of them were VERY highly rated at the time as well.

We put them in a rack right near the front of the store and figured they would blow out. Two years later, we gave almost half of them back to Dan which prompted Philip White of the Adelaide Advertiser to write a front page story in the Sunday Food Section about how we couldn’t sell those wines.

We figured that the people who wanted those wines didn’t come here and the people who come here didn’t want those wines…

d’Arenberg are some of the best OZ wines around, IMO. They drink well when young, they age well, too.

I never really thought of retailers in this light, but I suppose people might think of their local wine stores as being specialists, rather than generalists? And, thus somebody in your surrounding neighborhood had the Aussie crowd??

I’m sorry - I don’t understand your question.

I posted this on the other board

“How many people are aware that superb Pinot Noir and Chardonnay grow in Mornington Peninsula and Yarra Valley? Or Shiraz in Heathcote?”-Dr. J

This is a fair point that the good doctor has brought up. The answer is not many people, obviously. But where do we put the blame here? Dr J puts it squarely on the importers of Australian wines. Indicating that they have been concentrating too much on Barossa and McLaren Vale.

The problem with that argument is that importers are in this business to make money. It is their job to bring wines into the market that will sell. While Dr J praises the great work of Dan Philips and the Grateful Palate, does his portfolio contain any wines from the regions that Dr J is talking about? If so, how many?

I did a quick search and saw that the Wine Advocate has rated 28 Chardonnays from Yarra since inception. That have rated 150 wines from the entire region of Heathcote, while thousands upon thousands of wines have been rated from Barossa and McLaren Vale.

Dr J says that he visited these other regions and infers that there are many gems in these unknown regions. Yet the wines appear to get lower scores than a $12 bottle of Boarding Pass from Dan Philips.

None of this really makes sense to me. If you want to extol the virtues of how great certain unknown wine regions are, then show me the wines. I am glad he visited and appeared to have learned a lot. His predecessor, Mr P, apparently was not a believer in those regions to the extent that Dr. J is, based upon low scores and lack of coverage previously. If this is truly the case, than maybe out of 1100 wines reviewed, we should have seen a higher percentage of those said regions.

The importers can only do so much. And, in fact, they appear to be just following the lead of the critics who have tasted their wines.

Why import a $25 87 point Chard, when you can get thousands of cases of 92 point $12 Barossa Shiraz…

“I never really thought of retailers in this light, but I suppose people might think of their local wine stores as being specialists, rather than generalists?”

Many of the most interesting shops (and not just wine but books, music, you name it) are very definitely specialists. Ours focus is 90% on Italy, grower Champagnes and Belgian Biers with minors in Iberia, Tequila and Malt Whisky. We have ONE non sparkling French wine, TWO Chardonnays and both of our Cabernets are from Emilia Romagna. And, we are ALL about wine and food pairing and wine being part of an overall culture, not an isolated thing defined by a score.

The main inspiration was Kermit Lynch.

Several things from a historical perspective comes to mind with this article from Miller:

  1. Italy was once (1970’s) known for cheap rot gut quality wines. Notwithstanding the great Piedmonte and BdM wines, the market concept of Italian wines was worst than bad. There was even scandels about illegal additives in Italian wines. Italian wineries made significant changes and pulled themselves up by the bootstraps. It took years but they have transformed the image of Italian wines. The Germans worked hard and diligently in discriminating, in the buyer’s mind, the Mosel and Rheinhessen wines from the Schwartz Katz and Blue Nun. The Aussie need to start studying history and doing the same.

  2. France had a history of not exporting its junk wines, only those of highest quality. This helped France immensely. Yes, some inexpensive lower quality Bdxs came out, but they were small in number to the great wines that were exported. Harvey S’s most recent blog, in the WS online, is on more cheaper Aussie wine, hopefully better, coming to the American market. Is that what the Aussies need right now, a better $5 wine? A $5 wine that’s rated 83 as opposed to 80! This is all private money, and no one has control, but people had to be cringing over this article. [gheyfight.gif]

  3. My last comments are probably very opinionated. Has the fruit bomb, high alcohol, oak driven wine crazed subdued? From my acquaintances the answer is definitely yes, however, I can’t measure that from a national perspective. A problem the Aussies have, if the answer is yes, is that they have several years of yet to be release/sold wines of this style still in inventory. Who is going to eat, or in this case drink, all this wines with little market demand? I recently had a wine, from an Aussie winemaker that I had always respected and has a respected name in the industry, that tasted like Vicks Cherry Cough Syrup with 14.5% alcohol! My first fear was is this what we’re to expect from the last 4-5 vintages of this winemaker! I hope not [beg.gif] .

If the Aussie’s hope to be a barnd that is something for everyone, I think they will suffer. Grange might still sell for $250/ bottle while Penfold is selling other wine for $9, but nationwide it is a strategy for failure. Of course, it the current drought continues, a lot of areas may not be making wine at all in Oz.

I was always under the impression that one of the greatest hindrances to the Wine Advocate’s Australia coverage was that Parker refused to travel [and/or refused to subsidize anyone else’s travels] to Australia and hence was 100% dependent on the samples which the American importers sent to him in Maryland.

[BTW, the same problem with the travel budget & importer-dependency put Rovani at a severe disadvantage when it came to reviewing Germany, Austria, and the Loire (despite the fact that Rovani had family in Normandy, I believe).]

Having said that:

A) Is DJ travelling to Australia now to meet winemakers in person, and

B) Is DJ offering tips on more elegantly styled wines that aren’t made in the blockbuster style?

For instance, what does he think of recent vintages of the John Riddoch? Does he offer up any other examples of restrained Cabernet?

Does he recommend any high-acid Australian Rieslings?

What about Australian Chardonnay with zero residual sugar & no oak?

And offbeat varietals - gamay, nebbiolo, verdelho, gruner veltliner? - surely somebody in Australia must be experimenting with that sort of thing.

Nathan

The overall sentiment from me is that Dr. J is picking a battle with the wrong people. He is busy praising Dan Phillips, but meanwhile talks about how importers need to expand outside McLaren Vale and Barossa. Dan’s entire portfolio of late is just McLaren and Barossa!

What a joke!

Importers have been bringing in these wines for the US market. Parker never reviewed them and so away they went and in its place is more McLaren and Barossa.

If Dr. J wants to put in writing the problems of Aussie sales, he should start with his boss and work his way down to himself. It is just silly to blame the importers, who are ITB to make money and sell good wine. Make money being #1 on the list.

There is really no point to his essay except to encourage importers to change their selection. A sentiment felt by many that should have been said a few years ago.

Maybe if did not award so many 98-100 point scores from barossa and mclaren, the importers would have changed their portfolios.



If it got 93 points, it has to be good, right?

As an experiment I opened a 1998 Barossa Valley Estate E&E Black Pepper Shiraz on Friday night. I purchased these upon release directly from the importer in San Francisco based on a cold call and a good deal. Neither RMP nor BJM reviewed the wine. The Spectacle and other rags gave pretty good reviews for this and subsequent vintages.

From the very first bottle that I opened years ago, none has disappointed. Friday night’s wine was exactly what I enjoy in Oz wines…blueberry, plum, bacon fat and supple tannins. A complete 180 from what is being passed off today as the high end/high scoring wines from Barossa. I rank this bottle just a shade beneath the '98 Grange that FreakMount brought down here. I think that I have enjoyed every '98 Barossa shiraz and I know I have enjoyed every E&E that I have had.

It is a shame that wines like these are the exception rather than the norm.