Some truly stunning Alsace Riesling

Morning all,

It has been quite a night for me, and whilst I may not be in the most utterly of coherent states I’ve just tried some amazing wines and I wish to tell all lovers of fine things about them. A good friend, my partner and I had three Alsace Grand Cru Rieslings, followed by a bottle of Burgundy then another bottle of Alsace Riesling, late harvest this time. I’ll give some brief impressions here and if these are the kind of wines that float your boat you can read the full rant (and listen to the podcast) on my wine site.

We started with an Albert Boxler Grand Cru Brand Riesling 2001. It was an intense wine of power and weight, but the harmony was stunning. So much ripe fruit, but so much minerality and mind-buggering amounts of acidity. Brilliant, I tell you, brilliant.

This was followed by a Grand Cru Brand Riesling 2001 from Zind-Humbrecht. This was bigger, more exotic and more opulent than the Boxler, but not quite possessing a similar degree of harmony. But then, its vibrant intensity could compel even the most jaded of Riesling lovers. Serious kit, I have to say.

The final wine of this flight was another Zind-Humbrecht, this time Grand Cru Rangen Clos St. Urbain 2001. Again this had a voluptuous nose of precisely the kind of buxom ripeness one seeks in a flash Z-H wine, but not quite the brilliant radiance of the two Brand Grand Cru wines.

We tried these wines again and again and our love for them only grew. We didn’t think that age had done so much for them, we even suggested they might have been more stunningly radiant soon after purchase, but they provided so much pleasure it would churlish to get to worked up about this. If I had more bottles I’d be ageing them for another decade just to see if they do actually age gracefully.

We then had an interval with a bottle of Pinot Noir, this is all we were told about it; I was supposed to blind taste and get it right (lawks!). It had a beautiful, slightly floral nose with elegant fruit and a rich earthiness. The tannic structure was certainly present, not too tough though, with good acidity and more of that beautiful fruit. Very attractive with a noticeable degree of class. I guessed Morey-Saint-Denis Premier Cru 2002 from Domaine Dujac, it was actually Morey-Saint-Denis villages 2004 from Domaine Dujac; I aimed too high! It was certainly one of the best 04 Burgundies I’ve had for a while, not too thin, too acidic nor too tough. A charmingly impressive village wine, especially for an 04.

We finished off with Riesling Grand Cru Sommerberg ‘D’ Vendanges Tardives 2005 from Boxler. Wow, what a wine this was. Real late harvest character with incredible concentration of fruit, screamingly lovely minerality and a shed-load of acidity. A large scale palate but, as always with Jean Boxler’s wines this was mind-bendingly balanced. The acidity was so fresh and lively, the complexity so ravishing and the finish so long and complex. What a wine! My only bottle, alas. No, not ‘alas’, I loved drinking it and so did my friend and partner.

And that is surely what it is all about, don’t you think? I could have popped these with people who are less important to me, or with people who have more restrained oenophile tendencies, but that wouldn’t have been so enjoyable. If you can pop a bottle of something good with people who know, people who care, it is such a rewarding experience. We all enjoyed these wines and enjoyed each other enjoying them (if you see what I mean). We buy wine to share with our enlightened friends, and what a good thing that is to do.

I hope this slightly ‘tired and emotional’ (as a newt) post conveys some of the hilarious fun I’ve had tonight. I cannot recommend these wines, particularly the Boxler and Dujac flavour wines, highly enough.

Bed time, nighty night,

David.

These notes are giving me something to research - in a hurry!

David,

First off, welcome to the board and thanks for the excellent notes.

I had the '01 Z-H Riesling Rangen a few weeks ago, and I found that it improved tremendously with a few solid hours of air. The wine picked up considerable weight and dimension in that time. Was that your experience as well? I also thought the wine would improve with more bottle time, but I think I was influenced by the fact that I had the wine along side the 1998 and 2000, each of which was darker and seemed more dense and layered.

I keep meaning to look for more Boxler Riesling. It appears as if you think that would be a good idea. The Brand sounds truly lovely.

Brad

Thank you for the fantastic notes. Sounds wonderful

I haven’t quite gone to bed yet… Todd, Brad and Berry, thank you for being compelled by my enthusiasm. The evening’s producer of choice was clearly Boxler; many, many times have the team and I drank his wines and we always love them. I admit to cheating on the price-front slightly, as I buy them direct, but even from his agent in Blighty the prices are embarrassingly low considering he is one of the great movers and shakers in Alsace these days. When I pop by Niedermorschwihr (one of the most difficult words I know how to spell) every summer to pick up my allocation I feel I am slightly cheating him when I hand over a small pile of money and get given such wonderful wines in return. If you enjoy stylish, characterful and complex Rieslings then hit wine-searcher and find your local supplier.

I had another Boxler Riesling recently, which was even more stunning than the Brand. The note is here.

Brad, yes the Z-H Brand did improve with air (as did the Rangen). This resulted in the partner switching to saying he thought the Z-H Brand was the best of the three. I had an 98 Rangen Z-H Riesling a couple of weeks back that was so oxidised it was completely orange and smelled of Tokaji. This resulted in me worrying a bit about these two, but clearly that were in top nick and will continue to be for a long time.

Anon!

David.

Great notes, David, particularly if compiled while not “utterly coherent”. Thanks for pointing these wines out - my wife and I have enjoyed any number of German rieslings, but are less conversant with Alsatians. You’ve given us something to investigate.

Hi Brad,

The Z-H Rangen was not finished last night so I am just having a taste to see how it has changed. It certainly changed over the few hours we were tasting it, but not so much after a night in the fridge. The nose seems a hint more exotic in terms of the fruit and I think the minerality is a shade more obvious and rich. But these are very slight changes. Again I think the palate has a bit more fruit, it seems a touch weightier and has lost every hint of that dirtiness with bothered me momentarily. Again, not such massive changes. A very pleasing wine, to be sure.

If you are after some Boxler wines you should look out for his 2007s; this is a very good vintage in Alsace and a real success for Jean Boxler. I’m afraid my notes from my visit last summer are not the most informative as I got rather enthusiastic when tasting through his range. I’d go for the Grand Cru Sommerberg Rieslings (although perhaps not the young vines ‘JV’ cuvee) in preference to the Brand (good as it is). He makes so little Brand Riesling you rarely see it being sold.

Cheers,

David.

David,

Thank you for posting such excellent descriptors of these ZH’s and the boxler; while I have had a love affair with ZH for quite some time, I finally had the opportunity to try a Boxler Riesling, the 06 Brand which came across very similar to your go with the 01 version. Tremendous richness and minerality yet framed by brilliant acidity, my note is here:

2006 Albert Boxler Riesling Brand - France, Alsace, Turckheim, Alsace Grand Cru AOC (1/1/2010)
I’ve really been hammering through a fair amount of Rieslings as of late, and I’ve came to a satisfying conclusion: when push comes to shove, I simply adore Alsatian Riesling and wines like this are the reason why. It’s that picture perfect marriage of dry, salivating acidity married with that oh so skillful and gentle touch of rich r.s that trully makes the experience take on a third dimension. You really had to work the nose, but when aggressively prodded, the fiery Brand terroir was in fine form indeed. Initially very dry in the mouth, but as soon as your tongue had adjusted to the paper cup sharp acidity, a balloon of rich yellow plums and spice lifts the palate into a sensual delight. Still young of coarse, but this will be a real gem of a wine in another 4 to 6 years. Purchased locally for $29 and I am definitely going back for more. I’d love to compare this side by side with a ZH Brand, would make a hell of a tasting. (92 pts.)

I have a lone bottle of the 01 Brand (ZH), based upon your note above, it seem this still needs addition tie to round into form or do you think there is merit to cracking one in the near future? Thanks!

Dale,

I’m pleased you enjoyed the Boxler. A wine with undoubted class and real personality. Delicious too, wouldn’t you say? Worth buying a Grand Cru Sommerberg Riesling from him should you see one (although not the young vines ‘JV’ cuvee), they are amazing.

I would open your bottle of Z-H in the not too distant future, it is a damned fine wine which is providing a lot of pleasure now. I’m not sure it will provide any more fireworks if you keep it, and there is a very real danger of premature oxidation with these wines. Better not to risk it and far better to have a lot of vinous fun with it in the near future.

Cheers,
David.