I finally enjoyed the third and final bottle that Chuck so generously shared with me. I was surprised at how different these wines were. The good news is I enjoyed all three. The bad news is that I enjoyed all three, so I don’t have a ton of direction on where to focus. I guess I’ll just have to keep trying.
Fonseca 1994:
Silky, but persistent tannins. Nothing rough about this. Lots of fruit in focus, dark cherry and plum. Seems very youthful. The finish just keeps going and going. Not much in the way of secondary flavors yet.
I had this one first, and my initial thought was that this was more like a 2016 vintage port I had opened than it was to a 30 year tawny. Extremely enjoyable in its way, but not what I expected. I have a feeling it has many good years ahead. As it sat, the depth improved and it was more like what I expected. Although they are extremely different, this tied with the graham’s as my favorite. I will be searching out more of this.
Taylor fladgate 1994
Dates and floral notes on nose. Mostly dried fruits on palate: dried cherry, prunes, raisins. A little medicinal. Candi sugar (sugar used in making Belgian style beers). Syrupy mouthfeel.
This was my least favorite. The sweetness and syrupy mouthfeel felt out of balance. I still enjoyed it.
Grahams 1994:
Nose: dried fruits, eucalyptus, alcohol heat.
Palate: pleasantly surprised the alcohol from the nose didn’t come through here. Dried cherry, cassis, licorice, menthol. Really elegant. I perceived this as higher acidity, which I enjoyed. Not cloying.
This tied with the fonseca. It had more of the characteristics I associated with port going I (Carmel, baking spices) but not as over the top as the fladgate.
This was a wonderful way to get my feet underneath me in the world of port. I can’t thank Chuck enough.