During the last auction, someone speculated that it was likely a shill bidding situation to inflate the “apparent value” of the bottle and that and we should be wary of a second bottle miraculously appearing shortly thereafter.
I have no knowledge of anything, just recalling that earlier person’s eerily accurate prediction.
Have your buddy buy the wine at an inflated price and then turn around and sell the wine again but to an unsuspecting person at the “new value” or there abouts?
Of course, an alternative theory is that another person with another bottle was shocked by the high price of the last one and decided to cash in. Like you, I have no specific knowledge, just another theory.
I like your “Theory” Ken. There is obviously a demand and looks like a little supply remains. It wouldn’t surprise me to see another bottle in the next year.
Personally, I don’t think someone would pay the buyer’s premium to winebid in order to drive up the price considering the insane hammer figure. An expensive ‘rig’ and the 2nd bottle would have to sell for considerably more to come out on top.
Wow! Puts a little dent in things. In order to set up a second “real” sale you are looking at 30% each way or at least 45% to whoever set it up. I’m not sure that makes much sense. (Check my math…I wasn’t a math major nor a CPA.)
“If the only tool in your box is a hammer, every problem is a nail.”
Didn’t you mention in the last thread that you had to source this bottle from the secondary market to fill the hole in your own library? I hope you held on to that bottle!