Just wonderingâŚ. A bottle removed from cellar and opened at room temperature is warming up a good 15 degrees (ok 5-10 in the UK lol). There must be some slow circulation of the wine on top of Brownian motion. So that quarter sized air/wine boundary is probably far from static. Any one notice a difference between slow ox on bottles just pulled vs bottles stood up in the kitchen for a couple of days.
(1) Which introduces more air and speeds up the aeration and eventual decline of a wine more: (a) drinking half a 750 over several hours, then recorking the bottle to revisit in a day or two, or (b) immediately after opening the 750, funneling half into a 375 or other smaller bottle to be completely full and sealing, then opening the small bottle in a day or two?
Iâve always believed (a) (and thus I do technique (b) if I want to reduce/slow the oxygenation); however others claim that the micro aeration from funneling the first half into a small bottle oxygenates the second half more than the pouring of the night one glasses plus the exposed surface area in the half full bottle.
(2) If you do a quick double decant (pour the whole bottle into a decanter, then funnel back into the bottle full or almost full), how much does it matter how close to serving time you do that? Is right before you leave for the restaurant / tasting significantly different than a few hours earlier, or lunchtime, or the morning?
I guess the issue is youâve introduced micro-oxygenation with the two pours, and now those are acting on the wine even as itâs back full in a bottle and recorked. But how rapid is that process now, and thus, how important are differences of a few hours in how far ahead you do it?
Those questions donât have clear black and white answers, but Iâm curious for peopleâs experiences.
Letâs tease this out, realizing we are just spitballing and this is all far from scientific: if you have some Bordeaux you would have poured into a wide glass decanter two hours before serving it, but you are instead doing the immediate double decant (because youâre transporting it, or to go into a blind bag, or for whatever other reason), would you guess a similar amount of time, i.e. two hours? Would you do it less far in advance because the wine gets poured back and forth a second time? Would you do it more far in advance because once itâs back in the bottle it doesnât have all the surface exposure?
My experience with opening, pouring off a half glass and recorking Champagne, is it definitely has an effect, but it doesnât work very quickly. Hours are needed to really see a difference. Depending on how tight the bottle is, 3 hours min, but up to 6 hours is needed to see measurable results. But that also means itâs forgiving if you open it a bit too early. Itâs not like it introduces so much air that it is going to cause a more open bottle to fall off a cliff. I think it works the same way with the Audouze or slow-ox method on a Burg. Itâs not going to really aerate the bottle just sitting there open, so itâs very forgiving. But at the same time, thereâs no doubt that it does have an effect, contrary to those âscience-headsâ that say that a=b and b=c, blah, blah, so thereâs no effect.
Open a bottle, put it in the cellar. Wait 2 hours or however long you want to wait, take an identical bottle, wrap both in foil. Open bottle 2. Bring both bottles, and pour 2 glasses. Taste.
I was a non-believer and I still think it does nothing for young wines. But after trying it countless times on older wines I am now a believer. it works amazingly well for those 40 to 60 year old Piedmontese and Rioja wines that I open.