This has to be the winner:
2015 Sebastiani Vineyards & Winery Cabernet Sauvignon Alexander Valley
We had pretty great sex while drinking it, so… yeah. Delicious. What’s new?
My wife’s drunk friend went in my cellar and drank this while I was away from the home. She thought it “tasted old and weird.” She is an idiot and if Molly McFall is ever in your home lock your cellar! (135 views) - report issue | favorite author
“2019 Domaine Pichot Vouvray Domaine Le Peu de la Moriette
11/23/2021 - NEWKLNGJAMES LIKES THIS WINE:NR
Good on its own, Great with salmon.”
2008 R. López de Heredia Rioja Reserva Viña Tondonia Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo more
Options11/24/2021 - DHEWKO LIKES THIS WINE: 93 points
Tim Atkin Rated
I would say anyone with 10,000 plus notes on Cellar Tracker who don’t score and throw down a quick note about a wine. Those are the most useless tasting notes.
Also anyone scoring a wine in the 70s with no descriptor.
Definitely disagree with your first point. An experienced taster, if they are any good, can likely tell me more about a wine in a quick note without a score than a less experienced taster can in eight paragraphs with a score and an elaborate explanation of their scoring system. Especially for a wine with plenty of other tasting notes, a quick note might tell me where it is in terms of readiness or, for instance, a general idea of style. I admit though that the lack of score is not a negative to me at all.
I don’t say that to debate the merits of scoring, just to illustrate what attributes I do or do not find to be helpful. It doesn’t really take a lot of words to describe readiness, overall style, and structure, which are probably the things I’m most interested in finding. I don’t need to read a dissertation on what types of fruit or floral notes a particular taster finds in a particular wine.