IMO, that much residual sugar in a dry red wine is an obvious flaw.
Not for possible âfunâ (âexcitingâ?!) drinking by casual wine drinkers with little interest in the intricacies of fine wine, but IMO, it should be to a reviewer.
Second, itâs all simple gravy, nondescript fruit tarted up with heaps of vanilla â no complexity, none even cited in the review. In fact, even the RS and vanilla was missed, somehow, in the first tasting, which is pretty amazing. How does a simple wine loaded with vanilla garner such a high score? Because itâs exciting? Wow. Ding Dongs might be hedonistic and exciting, too, but they are not fine pastry.
The fruit is over-ripe. To me, this is a flaw. Not cited in review.
There is not enough acid to bring the wine into balance. This makes the wine very easy to understand and enjoy by casual wine drinkers, but IMO it is not snobby, just an opinion, that this is the type of flaw that should disqualify the wine from consideration as fine wine.
No shame in drinking it, liking it, thinking itâs fun, but IMO, negligent to call it fine wine.
Guilty pleasure? Ok. Give it an 88 and admit you sometimes like to eat Ding Dongs â and warn your audience that this is one of those guilty pleasure wines you like. Some self awareness would be nice.
If it were $12 a bottle, Iâd buy a few cases and serve it at large cocktail gatherings to non-wine-geeks. I wouldnât shame anyone for enjoying it, but I wouldnât call it fine wine.
Thatâs the 2012 Caymus âSpecial Selectionâ Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon (Pre-Arrival) Price: $159.00 for people who donât know how to click linksâŚ
More than twice the price, itâs gotta be at least twice as good, right?
ââŚfollowing on the heels of the regular 2012 Caymus Napa bottling which (while celebrating the wineryâs 40th anniversary) was the most popular wine weâve sold in 2015. We are awaiting reviews and scores on the wine, but given the quality of the 2012 vintage of Napa, and the fact that the regular bottling received 96 points from Robert Parker, itâs a safe bet to assume this is going to be incredibly well received by the press.â
So I have 1 bottle of this. For those of you who would actually drink it, do you suggest cellaring it a bit or drink soon? Decant or no decant?
Assuming the primary complaint is the fact that the wine is too sweet, does cellaring and/or decanting normally help/hurt a CA Napa cab that is on the sweet side?
Bruce,
Drink it now, itâs not going to improve with age. You could decant it for an hour or two, but itâs not really the type of wine that needs it, or that will change much with air. The bottle I had tasted the same the next day as it did the night we opened it.
I recently weirdly had the chance to taste the 2009 Special Select. Trimpi and Nellens are doubled over in laughter reading that sentence. I was at a dinner and the folks there didnât know my palate so well (as far as red wine goes it is Pinot and Nebbiolo almost exclusively) and they were being generous. It was a nice gesture on their part for sure to break something out of their cellar they appreciated.
I gave it the good college try. Really. I just couldnât do it. It was like drinking a Slurpee in the middle of the summer and doing it much to quickly. I had to give my portion back to them. It is not poorly made it is just so far out of my range and capacity that I couldnât deal with it. I am aware that in no way does that make me correct about that wine.