Is 2000 Bordeaux actually approachable now?

[Robert.A.Jr]

I enjoyed Robert’s ironic, sarcastic and coincidental tasting of the Montrose. The result seemed to mirror my two.

[Scott_G_r_u_n_e_r]

Hmm. I look for more secondary sardonic notes in aged bordeaux… will wait a few more years to crack my 2000 montrose

[Rudi_Finkler]

Coincidentally not ironically.

Coincidentally, it rained on his wedding day.

David pisses on everyone. I only see his posts if he’s quoted.

At least, he treats everyone equally, per se not a flaw.

[Robert.A.Jr]

[John_Morris]

Bu coincidence, I decanted the 2000 Montrose for about an hour at home and then we decanted it again at dinner. Ironically, we decanted the 2005 Montrose at dinner, and started enjoying it next to the 2000 after about 45 minutes open. These are both sarcastically gorgeous wines, with the 2000 starting to open, coincidentally. No regrets, ironically, and we all enjoyed it very much. The 2005 is still exceedingly youthful and primary and sarcastic, at least my bottle was. Lots of promise on that one, coincidentally, I think it will be great, but I would not touch for another 10. It barely budged over a 3 hour dinner. Ironically, the 2000 reveals a broad range of the fruit color spectrum while the 2005 was mostly all darks and quite powerful, as one would expect from this vintage. Again, these are both excellent wines, and that’s not sarcastic, bombastic, or fantabulastic.

Don’t you mean “sardonic”?

[Robert.A.Jr]

Actually, mordant would have been more apropos, Johnny Harvard.

You nerds know that I probably beat you up in grade school, right?