Just wanted to get the board’s opinion on how to react on this recent restaurant experience.
A few of the burg guys and I got together at Providence in Los Angeles for dinner last thursday. The typical menu has the option for 3 tasting menu’s. A 5 course, 9- course at $125 and a “chef’s tasting” which is typically 13 courses at $175. We opted for the last option and prepared for our meal which is typically 9 courses of meat/seafood then one cheese and 3 dessert (why anyone would need 3 is beyond me). The restaurant was aware of one of the diet restrictions by one of the guys of “no food with a central nervous system” and have taken care of him before when we’ve dined there previously. He gets food that works with his diet, we get food that has no restrictions.
They also offered a “winter truffle” option from Australia as a special which we did not ask to partake in
Two issues (which I thought were pretty big issues in service and communication)
The somm was setting up our flights and along the 5th course let’s us know that he will be bringing the final 2 savory courses our with our red burgundy. Doing some quick calculations of the dishes, I noted that would leave us with 7 savory courses. I confirmed with the waiter that we were on the 5th course and asked why we were only doing a total of 11 courses if we were doing the “Chef’s Tasting”. The waiter stated that he took the liberty to substitute courses for a black truffle supplement. Mr. Curry and I were both unamused by this revelation as I think if you are ever going to do a reduction of expected courses you should at least inform them diners prior to the service of the food so they could make decisions right? What made it worse was the fact that they grated the black truffle with what looked like a cheese grater and all the truffle flavor was either completely lost or they had initially very little flavor (no offense to our Australian brethren here, but those winter truffles were nowhere near as good as the ones from the northern hemi).
Second issue: For a seafood restaurant that specializes in fish, we were served no fish. In fact we were served miniscule portions of shellfish, some that still didn’t conform with our dining buddy’s diet anyways so he was left wanting on certain courses. They decided that since his diet was there, we were to follow his restrictions on the menu. Another thing I wish they confirmed with us opposed to telling us at around course 6 when I was curious when we were going to be served some fish!
I just felt that at $350 a person after corkage/tax/tip we should be entitled so some information on what we are dining on, especially when they move away from the norm of the menu to our disappointment. Am I being picky by being annoyed by the lack of communications? The courses in fact weren’t all that great and I thought we would have had a much better experience if the menu was done without any substituions that were not asked by our party. I’ve left that restaurant before at half the price with a much better dinner with more/tastier food.
This isn’t the first time we’ve had an odd communication problem. After doing a 7-8 course meal last time, we were discussing how much we loved Burrata at the table. A waitress overhears it and asks “we have a burrata dessert, how bout I bring one out for the table to share?”. When we got the bill, she charged us for the dessert!?
Otherwise, apart from what I thought was a massive disconnect in communication, the wine service and standard service were spot on.
on the otherhand, we saw John and Mary there celebrating their 10th anniversary! Congrats .