Overview:
Some lovely New Yorkers were kind enough to host Michael & me for our first travel wine weekend of the new year. It was so much fun! Friday evening found us at a round table with an excellent crew & a beautiful collection of wines. An ideal way to open the Season.
@Jon_Lawrence Got us the perfect table & then (very kindly) essentially took us all to dinner, too. He ordered fantastically. So much kindness showed to us. And thank you as well to @J0hnEhrl1ng(who got this weekend in motion a few months ago).
@MChang has been cranking out notes all weekend, so I thought I’d start this thread off first.
Opening Cristal Flight: 2004, 2013, & 2013 Rose
A lovely beginning. I don’t have anything super insightful or introspective to add here. The 2013 Rose is a particularly special champagne. Lovely aromatics & exquisite structure. That crystalline structure expands & adds layers with perfume as the wine absorbs air in the glass. It was the class of these three.
I think this particular bottle of ‘13 BdB was a little softer & more advanced than I am used to. Pleasant, warm mouthfeel but not quite firing on all cylinders. The ‘04 was similarly warm & accessible. Less structure than one might expect.
A Dynamic, Startling Blind
Very pretty nose. Deep, clear cherry fruit. Light color, and hardly any structure remaining. My guess of this being from the 90s was rebuffed. And the next guesses were immediately: okay, it’s older then? Nope. This is a 2010. What? ![]()
You’d never get it in a million years. Maison Ilan has entered the chat. 2010 Charmes Chambertin. The Blind was fun. Give this wine its due: it was showing very purely & tasty. And a bit of a magic trick given just how little structure is left on it.
Flight 1: 2008 Dujac Clos de la Roche, 2008 Lignier Clos de la Roche, and 2001 Bertheau Bonnes Mares
I think it was a good choice to lead with the deeper vineyards first. The following flights had more superstar showings, but these were a good start.
I know some (like Ryan out in Texas) are very high on 2008 Dujac. This bottle was pleasant, but not a showstopper. Smooth, not showy in its aromatics (hardly any cluster, for instance). Nice violets & texture. But nothing truly leaping out the glass or capturing attention in the mouth. Pleasant.
The 2008 Lignier has size and energy to burn. Certainly 20+ years ahead of it, if not more. Showed very similarly to a bottle Michael & I had in October. Very classic, rustic notes of meatiness & soil. The oak structure is just beginning to unfurl. Lots of grip. A bit of a Bordeaux-drinker’s Grand Cru at the moment. Size and structure, and a little burlier rather than ornate. Will keep getting better.
The 2001 Bertheau Bonnes Mares was my favorite of the flight. This wine continues to represent itself very harmoniously to my palate. Not a showstopper aromatically, but just warm, mature cherry notes with rolled layers of calm spice. Nothing crazy. And a fantastic, warm texture. No sharp edges. Medium heft, very accessible and warm. I like this wine’s musicality. A nice rounded cello sound.
Will had a nice observation later in the evening that the Bertheau had a relaxed, classy but nothing excessive feel for a wine you’d be having at home and really enjoying its warmth over an evening.
Flight 2: 2009 Mugneret-Gibourg (Ruchottes-Chambertin & Clos Vougeot)
Phenomenal.
These two were just effing phenomenal. The Ruchottes was on fire as soon as it touched the nostrils. Lovely, explosive qualities. Sweet fruits, crushed flowers, hints of fresh earth. Warm sensations everywhere. Elegant rather than forceful. This isn’t a jammy 09. Rather, it is very light in the mouth. Joyous AF. Honestly, just blew away the table.
Thankfully, beautifully, the Clos Vougeot was a superstar as well. Very, very close to the Ruchottes in its showing. More purple fruits, maybe some violet or lavender, and a touch of linear acid to its structure. All wrapped up in an exceptionally beautiful package.
My two favorite wines of the night. That perfect style of unbelievably good Burgundy. You know in mere seconds just how delicious & complete the wines are. And you can still revisit over and over again for the next half-hour.
Michael’s gift to us. Jon accented the gift by procuring a literal tower of Duck for the table. Heaven.
Champagne Interlude: Selosse Initial (09 disg)
Oh, man. The hits kept coming.
Another totally pristine showing. This has verve in spades. I drink very little Selosse, and have had some bottles were the structure/electricity got lost a bit & the wines veer out of balance. Not here. This was a magical bottle. The Selosse Nose on display, but not with any excessive funk. And so much beauty & pizazz in the mouthfeel.
From Alex’s personal allocation. A marvel in its freshness. This quite the advertisement for what Selosse can be. And I’ll share a personal smile: The Selosse was metaphor
. If you need something quite complicated explained succinctly & without getting lost in the weeds, Alex will come through for you
Flights 3 & 4: 2007 Fourrier Clos St Jacques, 2006 Rousseau Clos St Jacques, 2005 Rousseau Cazetiers, and 2008 Mortet Lavaut St Jacques
We did these two at a time, initially, with the Rousseau paired last. But we could compare a bit as we were approaching the end of the evening. And I particularly enjoyed the CSJ study.
The two Clos St Jacques were my two clear winners here. And not just because I love CSJ. The Mortet LSJ was kind of reserved & not showing its full character, I don’t think. Pleasant, but not unfurling into something eclectic. Honestly, the evening wasn’t the best showing from the 2008 vintage. The 05 Rousseau Caz also felt a bit restrained. I’ve had some sultry Cazetiers, and this was pretty but not sultry or seductive. I think its 05’ness probably keeping the fun a bit locked up.
Aromatically, the two CSJ really showed up. The Rousseau got better & better in the glass. Excellent aromatics but a bit angular in its mouthfeel for a long time. Even as it grew more expansive, it lacked true Rousseau velvet. That’s obviously the highest of standards, though. A gorgeous wine & I’d never had the 2006 before.
Fourrier CSJ really holds your interest in the glass. Very expressive. Michael & I did the 09 & 13 Rousseau/Fourrier CSJ study in December. I find that the Fourrier Clos St Jacques maybe evolves/changes aromatically in more kaleidoscopic ways. Different notes/textures come out a little bit the more you sit with it, the more it opens, the more a little morsel of food interplays. I find Rousseau more consistent in how it radiates its aromatics more steadily. This can make the Fourrier a little more of a wildcard, and I really enjoy following it.
These Clos St Jacques are great wines. And fantastic wines to close an evening. The aromatics are very bewitching, even after a full dinner & full lineup. These wines keep your palate fully awake.
Conclusion
Very gracious & spectacular evening.
I love the table. I love being around some seriously experienced palates. But I also love that the vibe isn’t too precious. Lots of honesty & friendly examination of these wines.
You can’t beat it.