Recently I’ve noticed some low-end wines using the word “black” on their variety descriptor in the label. I’m not aware of that being a standard enological or viticultural term, and Google comes up empty. Is this based on anything real or just a marketing thing?
(Not looking for any ‘politically correct’ satirical comments but fully expect some given this is WB.)
I assume that the masses who have made Apothic and its ilk such strong market players are seeking a little more OOMPH in their wines.
I was caught off guard by the sudden appearance of the Cline “Cashmere Black Magic” blend, though it’s price of $25/btl is probably a shot at being the luxury-end/apex predator for consumers who rely on label colors to indicate the “richness” factor of their wines (see Menage à Trois “Silk” and Apothic “Crush”).
The failure of back-label language in conveying to consumers the contents of the bottle smartly defers to the use of a codified color scheme in labeling, IMHO. It does accomplish more with less.
I know zero about those particular wines or what, if anything, they are trying to signal with that branding.
But “black” is a common term used in product marketing. Uber Black, Johnny Walker Black, American Express black card, etc. Maybe it’s meant to sound sleek or mysterious or something.
I might be able to shine some light on the differences. Apothic Red is Zinfandel based and Apothic Dark is Petite Sirah based.
Mark West is well known for blending Syrah and Petite into their Pinot Noir to make them palatable. Their “Black” label also uses Saignée to increase the skin/juice ratio.