Okay, so the results are overwhelming in support of both Brett Favre and changing the numbering system.
It’s now official, that we will have, from this point forward (someone inform Leo, as he will fight it) have Berserkerfests in chronological numerical order.
I think it might be more confusing to change the past ones, so let’s start with 3.25, and call that puppy 4, ok?
The only potential issue I can think of is for people like Leo who plan 6 months ahead of time - he will need to number his Berserkerfest, but there could, as in this case, be one or more in between the last Berserkerfest and his, so we might have to have the NYC 'fests be somewhat flexible in numbering, meaning they could start out as 5 (which is what it will be), but change to 6 if another comes along.
We good?
(For those who plan the events, you can use any form of numbering you like - binary, Roman numerals, or standard numbers. Whatever fills your Twinkie)
Dude, just grab the next number in line and run with it. Who cares if you’re organized and can put 6 in the books before the disorganized Leo puts 5 in the books a couple of months later? No biggie in my book.
Then again, I don’t see the need for any numbers myself.
I’ve edited Napa 3.25 to 4.0. My only request was to leave the prescheduled ones alone, especially only 2 weeks away, we’ll need to change name tags & stuff already made. But sh!t happens and I’ll live
It would probably be better around here to use irrational numbers. The first one could be the square root of 2, the 2nd one could be e, the third one could be pi, . . .
You guys need to be a little more forward-thinking in setting standard formats.
In anticipation of the 1.2 billion Chinese wine drinkers who will be joining and taking over this board, the format for all future events shall be as follows: 華人24小時不間
Really, it’s the only way to ensure that there’s ANY good Bordeaux at future Berserkerfests.