A Chablis & Musigny Lunch.

The Doc, Stockbroker and I have made it a point to have a Christmas wine lunch together ever since we fell into each other’s company. We normally hold it at Tivoli (the fine dining outlet of the Mandarin Hotel Manila), but, this year, 15th December 2008, the Stockbroker decided to move it to Old Manila (the French restaurant of the Peninsula Hotel Manila, another frequent haunt).

Since the Doc and I both had 3pm appointments and the Stockbroker ran late at the office, we limited ourselves to only two bottles for lunch. Thus, my bottles of 1979 Pichon Lalande and 1988 Hugel Gewürztraminer SGN, as well as the Doc’s 1990 Marquis d’Angerville Volnay Premier Cru, were left unopened for another day.

For our identical starters of seared scallops atop mini-cannellonis filled with a sweetish carrot purée, the Doc already had for us a nicely chilled bottle of:

2000 Domaine Raveneau Chablis Premier Cru Montée de Tonnerre - Raveneau is, simply put, one of the very best (as well as one of the priciest) makers of Chablis, with an unquestionable and well-deserved reputation. No need to belabor this point. Montée de Tonnerre, together with Montmains, happen to be two particularly favored premier cru Chablis vineyards of mine.

The wine was a study in typicity and terroir, with hallmark cold, wet stone and steely flintiness seamlessly, subtly, but definitively, permeating its fine green apple and white stone-fruit with whispers of straw, delicately-knit citrus and a very light touch of leesy vanilla. In the bouquet, there is also a slight suggestion of cool (but not sweet) mint (in the cold-stoniness) which was absent on the palate.

Clean, well-focused, poised and precisely balanced, barely medium-bodied. A wine of finesse that matched well with the seared scallops (unsurprisingly), but I felt that the carrot purée filling of the mini cannellonis was too sweet for it.

With my duck breast and duck confit atop a bed of lentils (the Doc had his usual Canadian bison while the Stockbroker opted for my usual rack of lamb)…

1990 Domaine Comte Georges de Vögué Musigny Grand Cru Cuvée Vieilles Vignes - We noted how dark and dense the wine was - the most intensely dark red I’ve ever seen in a Burgundy to my recollection. The bouquet was intense as well, with the tell-tale sweet perfume of Burgundy decay: old violets and hint of compost to its deeply-veined, darkly spiced, roasted-ripe, briary, blackberry, wild black raspberry, tart black cherry profiles. Probably the densest, most extracted red Burg in my experience, yet it was well-balanced and carried its muscled frame with a confident spring in its step.

Whether this seeming extra dose of testosterone may be accounted for by the vintage or the maker’s style, I can’t really tell as this is the first Musigny I’ve had, by Vögué or otherwise. All I can say is that it is bigger, more powerful and denser than any Chambolle-Musigny I’ve tried. Chambolle-Musigny reds, like those of Volnay, are generally known for being lithe, graceful and elegant rather than dense, powerful and hefty (see: 1990 Marquis d’Angerville Volnay Premier Cru Champans).

Of course, there are exceptions, i.e., the comparatively masculine/muscular Volnay premier cru Taillepieds and Chambolle-Musigny’s other grand cru, Bonnes Mares, that partially falls within Morey St-Denis. Notably, the reds of Morey St-Denis are known for their meatier, heftier, masculine character.

In any event, I much enjoyed the subject wine with my robust and earthy duck with lentils. Nice lunch.

Oh boy, wait until Justin Wells finds this post. Raveneau (“RAV!”) is his fave. Sounds like a wonderful meal, Noel. As always!

Thanks for the note on the 1990 de Vogue Musigny. I have a few bottles but have been saving them for a special occassion yet to be determined (when I get a date perhaps [help.gif] ; although I’m not sure it will age THAT long [tease.gif] )

I also have the 1995, 1996, 1999, 2000 in 375mL, 750mL and 1.5L

Ha ha, maybe you should have stuck to mags then.

Do they make a 3.0L?? [beee.gif]

Raveneau is stunning…a terrific example of Chablis at its best.

Yes, without a doubt.

It’s always a great lunch/meal anytime you have a Raveneau and a Moose. Thanks for the notes and data points.

Best,
Ed

I love that this is a ‘light lunch’ for Noel, compared to his recent culinary experiences.

Both seem like simple, perfect pairings.

Anytime, Ed. I hop my notes prove helpful to you.

Yes, a “lite” lunch. heh, heh.

It is the simple, “natural” pairings I love most.

N

hmmm, one of the first positive 90 Vogue Moose notes I’ve seen. Have you posted on this year’s December lunch? Happy Holidays.
alan

Have you tried the 2000 Raveneau Montmains yet? I was wondering whether it has reached a good point in its development.

Montmains is also a little richer and fatter than Montee de Tonnerre, correct? I was wondering whether 2000, which I believe was a ripe year, made the wine a little too opulent to be truly representative of Montmains and Chablis.

I was wondering when somebody was going to say something about the Vogue 1990 Musigny. Something very strange happened to that wine; never seemed faintly Burgundian never mind possessed of the exquisite elegance, balance, perfume and haunting layers of flavor of true Musigny. Instead it was a tannic wine, rich blowsy wine that seemed more like new wave Chateauneuf.


It has been eighteen months since I last had it, so perhaps it has begun to show signs of coming round. But I have had the wine several times, each time hoping that the wine will show something better. Musigny in 1990 should be amazing- this is for me, the most disappointing wine of the vintage.

LMD,

Was the Raveneau at it’s peak or do you think it can improve further?
Thinking of pounding one soon. (Maybe tomorrow if it’s ready).
I only own one bottle…

TTT

Hi, Alan.

Well, “positive” is relative (as almost everything is). I did state that I found it unusually dark and dense for a Burg and that it had an “extra dose of testosterone”. Personally, I didn’t really think those traits were necessarily positive, but I just tried to describe it as I saw it. It wasn’t bad at all, but I can’t see myself buying one for myself (I never did, as a matter of fact).

I’ve just returned from Christmas lunch, actually, but will not be posting on it. I took no photos and drank no wine - the latter because I am suffering from an allergy to something in the air and can’t really taste much as of yesterday. Lots of roast beef, ham and turkey at the lunch, but I just had the roast beef. Happy holidays to you and yours as well!

.
Hi, Yule.

No, unfortunately, I’ve not tried Raveneau’s 2000 Montmains. I’ll see if I can get a bottle of it soon to try out.

I cannot disagree with your assessment of the wine. As I stated to Alan (please read above), it is quite unlike any Burg I’ve had before, though, in itself, it was nice enough if one looks past what it should be and what one expects it should be.

That said, I never bought a bottle of this for myself after having had that wine.

Personally, I do not think it will change much with added time (but, then, one can only wait and re-try to know for sure). If you check the date mentioned in the post, my subject note is over 2 years old - so you’ve last had it more recently than I.

Paul,

Could improve further I would guess. I had it around 7 months later and below is my note (1st July 2009):

2000 Domaine Raveneau Chablis Premier Cru Montée de Tonnerre > - the Doc’s bottle, one we enjoyed during our traditional Grand Crew Christmas lunch last December. My notes then were as follows:

"Raveneau is, simply put, one of the very best (as well as one of the priciest) makers of Chablis, with an unquestionable and well-deserved reputation. No need to belabor this matter, that’s how it is. Montée de Tonnerre, together with Montmains, happen to be two particularly favored premier cru Chablis vineyards of mine.

"The wine was a study in typicity and terroir, with hallmark cold, wet stone and steely flintiness seamlessly, subtly, but definitively, permeating its fine green apple and white stone-fruit with whispers of straw, delicately-knit citrus and a very light touch of leesy vanilla. In the bouquet, there is also a slight suggestion of cool (but not sweet) mint (in the cold-stoniness) which was absent on the palate.

“Clean, well-focused, poised and precisely balanced, barely medium-bodied. A wine of finesse that matched well with the seared scallops (unsurprisingly)…”

Last night, the wine presented a noticeably more minerally character with more apparent notes of cold limestone, steel and nuances of fresh oyster shells. Again, an excellent Chablis of great typicity.

Best to all,

N