2013 Ridge MB Vineyard retrospective

1. Chardonnay Monte Bello, 14.5% ABV, bottled 3/15: light golden straw color; Aromas of pear, apricot, yuzu citrus, wet stone, salted toffee, toasted brioche, flinty-wet stone minerality; Surprisingly, still youthful, fresh, vibrant, firmly acidic, oily textures, bitterness/pithy grapefruit finish, and a persistent finish with a classic MB mineral aftertaste. I’ve recently had both 2012 and 2014MB chards, and both are much more evolved than 2013. Taste again sometime 2027-2029, in line with my recommended drinking window noted on the back label.

2. Cabernet Sauvignon Estate, 13.8% ABV, bottled 8/15 (75%CS, 20%MR, 3%PV, 2%CF): Deep ruby/garnet color; Red currant, bramble, sage, dried tobacco, olive, roasted vegetables, meaty-ferric rusticity to the nose. On the mouth it starts of showing sweet dried red berry fruit, mountain briar, savory herbs, elegantly resolved tannins, cool-climate herbaciousness, dusty and drying tannins in the back. There is a slight hint of herbal dill-oaky character in the final taste. This wine is showing expected development. I said drink over the next decade when I wrote the label in 2015. That feels about right, although it has staying power and not at all showing that its faded. It’s just much softer on the palate and the fruit is turning more towards dried berry.

3. Merlot Estate, 13.8% ABV, bottled 8/15 (100% Merlot): Dark purple color, inky and deep-not showing any garnet/bricking; This wine shows intense mountain bramble and stone fruits-black cherries. What a real surprise and delight to find in my cellar, knowing I have 11 more bottles. It’s a serious merlot with an incredible deep and seductive nose, that matches with equal intensity on the mouth. It’s plush, voluptuous, layered, shows no development. It’s an opulent merlot packed with great tannin structure, intense fruit to match, and showing incredible minerality. It’s very much right-bank Pomerol in style. It’s a shame we declassified so much from the Monte Bello (only 5% merlot included.)

4. Cabernet Sauvignon, Torre Vineyard, 13.2% ABV, bottled 8/15: Crimson/purple-slight garnet-brick hue at the rim. This wine’s aromas are unreal, highly scented sweet dried cranberries, currant, dried cherries, spice box of nutmeg and clove, chutney, and caramelized sugar of sweet oak. High-toned red fruit enters on the mouth, showing a mix of pomegranate, cranberry, and red licorice. The acidity is bracing, sharp and intense, it magnifies the red fruit and tannins making the wine a bit tightly wound and still unresolved. It really reminds me of some of the flavors of 1968 Monte Bello and/or some of those early vintage Ruby Cabernets. This is a wine made to age forever. The color is deep, but the bricking/garnet hue threw me. I think that’s more of an effect of low pH than actual anthocyanin degradation from oxidation. Low pH, high acid wines naturally have a color shift towards red, away from crimson/purple. I mentioned drinking enjoyment at a 10-15 year period on the back label. I think its safe to say this can be extended, probably doubled.

5. Historic Vines, Monte Bello, 12.6% ABV, bottled 8/15: Crimson/ruby color, slight brick hue. A nose that is distinctly Monte Bello-mountain bramble fruit, dried red berries, iodine, leather, cedar, sandalwood, cinnamon, forest floor, wet stone. Classically, Monte Bello on the mouth, elegant tannins, leathery, polished/resolved texture, licorice, fennel, crushed rock, and an earthy finish. This is a highly complex wine that I’ve had to taste over and over for the past few days as it revealed more layers. This comes from the oldest surviving vineyard block on Monte Bello, planted by William Short in 1949. This was the sole source of Monte Bello fruit until mid-70’s when Ridge’s younger vines began bearing fruit. As cabernet ages, it begins to struggle with vine disease. If eutypa die-back doesn’t kill the vine, the many leaf roll viruses slowly take its toll on the vine health through stunting photosynthesis. It’s a block with tremendous history and significance to Ridge, but it struggled to ripen grapes almost every single year. 2013 was an exceptional vintage, being a drought year and warm. This condition aided the vines in reaching ideal ripeness. It was picked, fermented, and clearly showing some excellent quality in the fermentor. At time of assemblage, it was voted to include in the blend, but then we decided it was deserving of being bottled separately to celebrate the history as being one of three of the oldest surviving cabernet vineyards still in commercial wine production in CA, maybe the world. In 2013, these vines were 65 years old, which is ancient for Cabernet. Normally, these vines get ripped out and replanted every 30 years, or in Napa every 10-20 years. I love that this wine has 12.6% alcohol and shows such excellent aroma and flavors. I do hope these vines are still in the ground. Every year there is a block performance review. Where yield declines and quality falls, those blocks are first worked over by viticulture to try and improve quality. If after a few years and no signs of improvement, the blocks get slated to be ripped out an land fallowed at least 7 years. The historic vines are four prime acres of some of the best terroir of Monte Bello. As healthy young vines, the expected tonnage would be about 9-11 tons based on a higher planting density. The old vines in 2013, only produced 2.4 tons and made 6 barrels of glorious wine. As long as the finance department had no say in ripping these vines, they should be safe (at least they were when I visited the Tasting Room in July 2021 for my birthday.)

6. Steep Terraces, Monte Bello, 12.7% ABV, bottled 8/15: opaque, inky purple color; Intense blackberry and cassis fruit aromas, cola, fennel, cedar, bay-laurel, and some hints of sweet oak and spices. Mixed red and black berry fruits on entry, wet stone mineral, firm acidity, chalky tannins, youthful, showing some leathery earthiness, black olive, tobacco, and a very long finish with some grainy unresolved tannins. This wine needs much more time. I won’t think about opening another bottle until 2033. Steep Terrace is an aptly named block in the middle vineyard. It’s extremely steep and a south facing semi-circle amphitheater shaped bowl. I’ve always loved the wine from this parcel. There was one other time this was bottled separately, 1993 Steep Terrace/ Horseshoe was the label. There were other times it was declassified and not bottled due to lack of intensity. 2004 late rains hit and wiped out quality. I can’t recall any other vintages that it didn’t make the MB selection. It is regarded as one of the core lots that are the heart of every Monte Bello vintage. It was planted in 1972 by the founding families of Ridge. Who knows the source of planting material. You’d think it would be a selection from within the existing vines, but I doubt that was done. The terraces are seriously eroded at this point and are 12’ wide following the contour lines. The block has many missing vines where disease, gopher, tractor took the life of a vine. It’s still producing impressive quality and it only ever needs some TLC, bit of compost, and weeding to keep the vines alive. Maybe by now missers have been replanted to shore up production on that incredible part of Monte Bello vineyard.

7. Ridge Monte Bello, 13.6% ABV, Bottled 5/15 (80%CS, 8%PV, 7%CF, and 5%MR): Deep crimson purple, slight brick hue. An incredible nose of cassis, blackberries, licorice-fennel, juniper, cedar, caramel sweet oak, lavender floral, and exotic oak spices. The palate is drenched in mouth-filling ripe dark mountain berry fruit. There’s a plushness to the body, velvety tannins, notable crushed rock/wet concrete minerality, black licorice, violets, and chalky young tannins. This is one multi-dimensional wine with so many layers. I’ve tasted, re-tasted many times over the last several days. (In fact, I’m tasting it again right now as I type this.) This simply is one of the great vintages of Monte Bello and truly classic. I’ve had the chance to taste every vintage made, including the '79 (unofficially released) and this is easily in the top 5 vintages of all time. I’d say 1968, 1970, 1974, and 1985 are in this camp of super vintages of Monte Bello. Clearly there are many more vintages deserving to be in this camp, many that I’ve been part of producing, but I’ve had to delineate based on my all time favorite wine experiences with Monte Bello and that is with these truly special vintages, that now include the 2013. As with every vintage, the success comes from everything coming together-from the weather conditions, picking decisions, handling of the fruit in the winery, rigorous tasting of the fermentors, and careful assemblage. There is a funny story here about the assemblage. We had just wrapped up the vintage, barreled everything down, saw the wines through their barrel malolactics and basically let them go to sleep around December 2013. Paul got a request for a barrel sample from Robert Parker. He hadn’t reviewed Ridge in a number of years and he had some pressure to put together a review. We had more or less stopped participating in submitting samples as it was clear there was no point, there was no upside and we were not Napa and making wine in that ultra-style. Alas, Paul came to me and asked what I thought of the vintage and if I could throw something together of what looked like the best lots of the vintage. Knowing these wines intimately from the time as grapes on vines, through fermenting, an now in barrel, I put together a blend and that was sent off along with many other wines Parker had requested. (Turned out RP loved the 2013 MB.) As usual the assemblage was done in early February of 2014. I pulled all the potential lots out of the cellar for our blind tasting. Going through everything and rigorously selecting the wines as a team, voting for consensus, we narrowed everything down to the absolute best of the best. When I looked at the list of everything we selected it was exactly the same list of wines as what I had prepared for Robert Parker back in December. I guess the story here is when you know its good, you know and it take years and years of experience to get to know the vineyard and its personality and what can blend together and build on synergy. This 2013 is superb in every regard. I would not be in any hurry to consume the remaining bottles in my cellar. I noted that this wine will reach optimal drinking in 15 years, then hold 20 more. It’s easily going to hit those target drinking years. That makes me 80 in 2050. That’s very doable. I’ll be around, I just got to be careful about not burning through the remaining bottles too quickly.
EB

38 Likes

Great notes

Ty

Looks like we are about the same age Eric. I hope the fates allow me to sample my last bottle of 2013 MB in 2050!

Here’s to staying fit, healthy, and drinking 13MB in 2050…and hopefully having the memory to recall why its such a great vineyard and vintage!

1 Like

THis is great. thanks

@B.Eric permit me a totally selfish question. I have several bottles each of Monte Bello 2013-17 in my cellar but have not opened a single one. I understand that they all need more time, but if you were to open one now, which would you select? (Anyone else with experience: please chime in!)

The older, the better, but not in the case of 2013. That vintage is a vin de garde even by Monte Bello standards. I would open 2014. I feel that vintage will have the best chance of showing some signs of maturity. That being said, I would decant it the day before you plan on drinking it. Maybe longer, but I’ll let others chime in as to how long.

3 Likes

Hi Neal,
The great thing about having several bottles is that you can taste over many different years as the wine evolves. I’m fortunate to have collected splits, fifths, magnums, and double magnums. In fact, the biggest bottle in my collection is a 6L of 2004MB. Splits always age the fastest and gives insight into age-ability for the remaining bottle formats. For the vintages you have I would drink in this order:
first 2015<2014<2013<2016<2017 last

2015 was a lighter vintage, less extractable tannins, required considerably more work to pull color from skins and tannins from seeds. It made an elegant Monte Bello. 2014 was second as its showing more evolved character. It was more tannic when young, but its resolved and showing secondary character and more of a character unique to a hot/dry vintage picked early. 2013-2016-2017 all need much more time. They are serious wines with muscular tannins structures, dark fruit, firm acid, and built for long-term aging. I had selected special corks for every vintage of Monte Bello, but finally got the special individually TCA tested corks beginning in 2016. Not only are the corks flor grade (highest quality and dense) they are not going taint the wine. Prior to 2016, I individually tested by soaking corks in chardonnay and tasting for TCA. I’d repeat this tasting three times before purchasing a small lot of flor grade corks, then have corks visually hand sorted. Once the corks arrived I would open up bags, resample, and repeat the chardonnay soak test. That was one way we really could escape the worst of cork taint issues during those tough years where it was a risk. We really wanted to find the very best corks to guarantee long bottle life. The denser the cork, the more natural the wash, the more neutral the paraffin coating the better the wine would be protected. We took cork selection as serious as barrel selection. EB

16 Likes

Nice insight into cork selection

Really appreciate the notes on the Historic Vines and Steep Terraces since I only have a bottle of each and notes are rare. I sampled a 2013 Torre Cabernet in February and really enjoyed it. I tend to like the higher acid wines. The comment about pH and color was a new insight for me as a consumer.

For the record, I’ll also be using the advice Neal solicited in my future Monte Bello sampling plan and look forward to the 2050 offline I see in the works :wink:

Cheers!
fred

That is one hell of a post, and a real public service! I am sure it will have value for a lot of folks. Thanks so much!

6 Likes

@B.Eric I notice you tasted the Estate Merlot, not the Perrone. Would you expect the Perrone bottling from 2013 to be cut from similar cloth or is there a signature of the site that would distinguish it from the Estate substantially?

Thanks,
fred

Eric, WOW, thank you! I’ve bookmarked your thread so I can reference it later, as 2013 is precisely when I started on my MonteBello trip (which all but ended in the 2024 vintage, as is well documented on WB), and I bought MonteBello, Steep Terraces, AND Historic Vines - two bottles each - so this post is absolute gold to me. Too bad @Robert.A.Jr is so opposed to American oak, no matter what, or he might one day get to share one of them with me and the gang…alas.

2 Likes

Hi Fred,

For some reason I don’t have the Perrone Merlot in my cellar. I might have given that wine away when I left Ridge. I didn’t have enough space in my home cellar to fit the many hundreds of cases I stored at the winery. Once I went through everything and took my most precious wines, I let the cellar and vineyard teams take the balance. After all, they were the ones working so hard to make Ridge successful. They deserved some good wine, too.
The Perrone Merlot came from the old vines growing at 2700’ elevation, just above the winery. They struggled most years to put out a crop. When those vines put out an awesome quality crop, I would harvest and co-ferment with the CF and CS from the nearby parcels and usually that wine would be quite powerful and always included in the Monte Bello of that vintage. When it was held out, as in 2013, and fermented separately, it would make a terrific merlot. The acid is most intense in this block as were the tannins. It is likely drinking young right now, just like the Estate Merlot. I now wish I had a bottle of it.

4 Likes

It’s been a pleasure to share my knowledge on WB. After all, Paul and I were open books on sharing what we knew about winemaking, viticulture, how the wines we made aged, any disappointments in the cellar, which wines were our favorites (even though we could never truly say, they were like our children-you can’t have a favorite.) Now that I’m disassociated from Ridge, I can be totally honest of what I think, be transparent about history, and review the wines in my cellar as an independent wine consumer.
As for hating on American oak…that’s the funny thing, in blind tasting-even the French critics like it, when it is done well. Of course, there’s a lot of awful AO barrels made, but the same can be said about French and Hungarian barrels. I’ve tried them all. We ended up working with the best in America, with great white oak sources, techniques, and the barrels worked. I’m using those same barrels on my new project, treating the barrels the same, but also using some of my favorite french oak. The barrels are a spice and they have to be carefully used. EB

5 Likes

If I want dill and coconut in my wine, I will have a piña colada adorned with big cucumber slices instead of pineapple!! :wink:

Imagine my surprise this past week to be on the hallowed grounds of Chateauneuf du Pape, only to discover a special cuvée matured in part in American Oak! The good news was, I did not bump into Phillip Cambie!

1 Like

Kinda hard to run into Cambie given that he’s dead.

@Craig_G would sigh that anyone took my dribble there seriously…

:stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

Todd, we were up at Ridge for the First Assemblage Tasting for the 2013 MB, in March of 2014. The components tasted so good that there were several people that quickly increased their order for that vintage, myself included. We had it up in Healdsburg a couple of years ago and it was as good as when we first tasted it. I think the 2013 MB will be a special wine for a long, long time.

2 Likes

I’m sure that’s the reason I joined that year, and bought up everything I was offered. Wine Berserkers is so good to me, so bad for my income.

EDIT, here’s the post (yours, in particular, Ed)

And I DID up my allocation on the spot…and have consumed 2 bottles already, the last in 2020 - I’m sure this wine is singing now, and thanks to this thread I have a guideline

1 Like