Assuming good storage etc…do you think a 71 Cheval blanc is still kicking? Also, as far as serving it, what do you recommend re: air time, decant, etc. Thanks
Zach, I’ve only had experience with the 1971 Sauternes (a number of which have been showing great). However, you just might get lucky with a well-stored 71 Cheval Blanc. While 1970 was the superior vintage, I think Cheval Blanc was one of the better dry 71’s, based solely on what I’ve read. It certainly won’t need any more cellar time, so give it a whirl! In a similar situation, Andy and I got lucky with some really well-stored bottles of 73 Pape Clement, which have shown great like 6 out of 7 times over the past 6 months or so.
As for opening and decant time, I would say just open it with no decant about an hour or two before I get there.
Not much help on Cheval Blanc. But I had a 71 Grand Puy Lacoste about a month ago. After 30 min of being open it was ready to drink. The bottle didn’t last longer than an hour but did well the whole time.
Opened a '69 the other week. It was okay (I’ve found '69 bdx to be largely over the hill), drinkable but not memorable, noticeably better than Cos, Lafite and a few others I’ve had recently. The surprise of the vintage has been '69 Mouton, which was really nice…at least the one bottle I opened. YMMV.
Zach, from the same cellar, we found one bottle that had the capsule removed and a chunk taken out of the cork, like someone put the corkscrew in, and then had a change of mind. Figuring it was not saleable, my bud and I opened it up and found it to be an excellent bottle of wine. Certainly not brown, or over the hill, in direct opposition to the Emperor’s last tasting note. I might consider opening up the bottle ahead of time to let it get some slow oxygen, but I don’t think that I would push things by decanting it. I hope that you enjoy it.
Once you shake the Emperor’s vintage hierarchy from your mindset you’ve opened yourself up to a whole new world of wonderful Bordeaux… the '66, '71, and '81 vintages come to mind first.
Agreed Keith. I have tasted many nice elegant and balanced wines from these vintages. Funny, but it seems like I have more disappointments from more hyped vintages ('61, '70) than the ones you mentioned. Maybe it’s elevated expectations, maybe it’s that I can drink the better wines from the lesser vintages, and can only afford the the lesser wines from the greater vintages.
Just as a follow-up, I served this yesterday at our monthly wine poker game in Boston…I opened it about 45 mins before serving (no decant) and I’d say people were drinking it within an hr. I thought it was a complete wine, everything was still present. I truly enjoyed it, as I think most of the group did. I also opened a 1970 Mouton Baron Phillipe which seemed thin and lacking in comparison.
I haven’t had the CB, but sounds great. I tend to like the 71s, though I’ve had mixed results, it seems maybe RB and Graves did better than Medoc. That’s on a limited sample, do others feel the same? Certainly I’ve loved the 71 Canon, Figeac, and DDC, all of which are pretty inexpensive if you can find.