1967 BG Georges de Latour; 2013 Courtin Efflorescence

British Airways’ foul ups during my effort to return to Dallas from Edinburgh Scotland left me stuck in London on Monday. I’ve been deprived of travel most of my life and just love it now, and so I took that as a wonderful opportunity. I ditched the BA Holiday Inn Express Airport for a room in Mayfair, went to Buckingham, then across the Mall to the Horse Guards, then to the Admiralty Arch, up to Trafalgar Square, a wonderful visit to the National Gallery and their Courtaud Impressionists Exhibit which was really top-notch, then to dinner at Hide. Not a bad way to kill an afternoon and evening.

Dinner at Hide (Above) was excellent. The restaurant is on Piccadilly and easy access from most Mayfair hotels. The restaurant is split between Hide Above and Hide Below. Below is a la carte. Above is tasting menu. The tasting menu was really quite excellent and began with a mushroom broth, charcuterie of goose meats, and veggies with a lovely dipping sauce. Next was a leek and black truffle dish with leek soup that was just phenomenal. Then a little egg in a nest dish with egg custard with wild mushrooms. I thought it was a miss. Too heavy and rich with no lift. Thank god for champagne. Then duck, cheese, dessert of baked alaska. All of the plates, with the exception of the smoked egg custard dish (which had a great presentation), were immaculately executed and really quite delicious. 5 course tasting menu for 115 pounds. Highly recommended. Add the cheese course.

Hide’s wine list is absurd. The by the glass list is excellent. The half bottle list includes 1961 La Chappelle, but at 11,500 lbs, it was juuuuust outside my price range. There is an excellent array of affordable and quite excellent champagnes and the staff and list is well trained and executed. They even list which Krug release they’re offering (the 166eme). If you can’t find something out of your 500 or so choices, you can access any of 3,000 additional offerings from a retail store they’re connected with. Any bottle you choose from the i-pad–complete with search functions–will be delivered to your table in 15 minutes. Luckily, there was enough brilliant stuff on the paper list for me to find something worthwhile quickly.

2013 Marie Courtin Efflorescence Extra Brut - This champagne is 100% pinot noir and 0 dosage. And it is excellent. It has beautiful acidity, a fine mouse, and great energy and lift. The nose offers chalk, white peach, apple, biscuit, and a hint of berry, followed by lovely floral notes. The palate shows good weight but great lift from the cut of acid, and is mineral driven. It is complex, but honestly rather difficult to delineate flavor after flavor. There is undeniably a ton going on, though. Loved it. 94

1967 BV Georges de Latour Cabernet Sauvignong I had a long discussion about this with the Somm. He agreed that if the bottle was not right on point–as far as condition–he’d comp it. Given that it was 51 years old and in half bottle, I decided to take a swing. The cork was utterly perfect and the fill was low-mid neck. I could’t have hoped for better condition. I could have hoped for better wine. The 1967 is not very good. That’s okay. At 51, I was expecting an education, not a great wine. The ABV is listed at 12% and I believe it. The immediate take away from the nose is that it is slightly green and dominated by licorice. Leeks and licorice. The palate has some dried cherry, a hint of fig, licorice, leeks. The acid cut is aggressive on the back end, suggesting a wine that was probably never really in balance. 84

The BV was a fun experience. I can’t help but think the grapes were picked early, were green, and that the wine must have been brutal young with it’s massive brace of acidity and underripe fruit. Even so, it’s a pleasure to get a taste of history, and that’s the oldest Napa cab I’ve ever tasted. I was so pleased at the bottle condition, and the somm at Hide was a pleasure to talk to and knew of Wineberserkers (Maison Ilan and Kurniawan, mainly). Hans Larsson.

That’s a cool read and experience, K-John!

Those mature BVs can impress when “on”. I’m not sure if '67 was a fine year, but I had the '68 about 9 years ago with my buddy on his 40th, along with an '89 Petrus. We spent the night going through those two bottles, and the BV held its own next to an perfect Petrus.

I jumped on Cellartracker to look at current notes, and there are 3 back-to-back notes on the '68 from fellow Berserkers!

8/25/2018 - salil wrote: 93 Points

Beautiful wine. Fully mature, on the downslope but this bottle still showed extremely well with plenty of red fruit that was still quite vibrant, and layers of cedar, tobacco, dill, and earth around it. Elegant and polished on the palate, though certainly thinning out on the back end.


5/25/2018 - Jeff Leve wrote: 82 Points

Fading, but not faded, there is a strong, earthy, overriding component that overwhelms the remaining essences of red fruits. Medium bodied, and starting to dry out, if you are holding on to any bottles, you should pop a cork.

5/23/2018 - dcwino wrote: flawed

Brother Jeff’s visit to DC - Mostly Bordeaux (The Grill Room at the Rosewood DC): Consistent with the last bottle. A lot of plum, not madeirized but past its prime.

And then Leve’s note from around the same time that I had it:


12/28/2008 - Jeff Leve wrote: 90 Points

Blind, I would have said it was an older Pauillac with its cassis, truffle and earthy notes. The palate had a nice blackberry, cassis and plum profile with a slightly rustic character filled finish. This will not get better, but well stored examples are a lot of fun to drink.

My experience was more in line with Salil - whose palate I share, he’s just smarter (I’m more handsome and lean) - and Leve’s from 2008.

I was happy with a 1968 BV Burgundy a couple of weeks ago. Still showing a good amount of dark fruit with a little tart acidity, not terribly complex but enjoyable which is pretty remarkable for a 50 year old blend of Gamay and Mondeuse.
3EB2BC5F-EEF4-4148-8A6A-7A4DFD1AF39E.jpeg
401AE4BF-4DD9-4C1E-8316-6467968CC1F5.jpeg

I think 67 was a downright cold year in California and many of the wines I’ve had from that vintage have had the green meanies.

Thanks for the note on the Marie-Courtin Eff. During my trip to Champagne this past May, this was perhaps the best wine I tasted all week, and I had close to 50 on that trip. Coincidentally, I sourced 3 bottles of the 2013 yesterday, as that for sure is headed for a spot in my cellar. I really dig what is coming out of Marie-Courtin, a lot.

  • 2013 Marie Courtin Champagne Efflorescence Extra Brut - France, Champagne (5/17/2018)
    Base year 2013 so I will avoid using the NV choice for my TN. For reference, all of the MC bottles are machine etched at disgorgement near the very bottom of the bottle. The base year will be listed as a two digit number, just prior to the 4 digit disgorgement date. 100% PN, zero dosage, raised in oak. Disgorged 02/2018. Man, this is great stuff, one of my favorites of this entire week. The cut, definition and precision here is spot on. Lemon aromatic, acidity and minerality all in play with balance. The long finish is where the red fruit really comes forward. To produce biodynamic, without dosage, using one grape and to make this…bravo.

Posted from CellarTracker

Mike: thanks for the trip down memory lane…Back in the day I enjoyed a number of bottles of the 68 BV Burgundy…and then it suddenly disappeared from the marketplace…

I think M.Richman and I had the 68 BV GdL maybe 10-15 years ago for his birthday and it was excellent. Sounds like you did ok with the 67. All those old BV’s have always smoked me with how good they can be.

‘67 GdL was not a strong wine. Great to hear that it wasn’t like most ‘67 Bordeaux at this point.

Always liked the ‘68 Beaulieu Burgundy. Thanks for the note, Mike.

Also back recently from London, and that Courtauld exhibit was something else. So many works that, while perfectly recognizable in execution, stand out from the artist’s oeuvre in subject matter or composition. Really enjoyed the Renoir “La Loge” and the Monet “Flood Waters” and of course the Manet “Folies Bergere.”

I had a bottle of the '67 GdL about 5 years ago, which unfortunately, despite a beautiful cork and good fill, had turned to vinegar. Glad you got to taste the wine in correct condition, even if it left something to be desired!

I didn’t drink anything nearly as old on the London trip, but enjoyed a trip to Social Wine, just north of Mayfair (where we drank by the glass, and highlights were a couple of Austrian wines – Mashpitt from Pittnauer in Burgenland, and a Welschriesling from Rennersistas in Neusiedlersee. Also a dinner at The Petersham in Covent Garden, with a bottle of an Italian orange wine whose name escapes me for the moment.

– Matt

Matt,

I couldn’t agree more about the exhibit. I thought Degas’s Two Dancers on a Stage was breathtaking. It is similar to many of his other works, but singular in its use of light and composition. I felt the same about Van Gogh’s Wheat fields with cypresses. His use of cool colors in the work make it stand out against so many of his other pieces. I’m not always (or even usually) a Van Gogh fan, but I thought that piece was stunning. I also stood in front of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza by Daumier for quite a while. I am not very familiar with Daumier’s work, but really enjoyed that piece. His other, not so much. Another I found compelling was Cezanne’s Lac D’annecy. It was as if he chose a whole different color palate for his piece than for most of his other works. Really, there were just so many amazing pieces.