10 CA Cabernets tasted blind

Our tasting group met recently to blind taste some California Cabernets. We had 15 in all poured in 3 flights of 5. We score each flight, discuss and then reveal the wines when the score tally has been calculated. Here are some of the wines in the order they were poured:

1996 SILVER OAK CABERNET SAUVIGNON ALEXANDER VALLEY- the color was a youthful purple with no sign of aging; the nose is redolent of mint, eucalyptus and leather [and I`m already thinking Silver Oak with the first 2 being so obvious and a hallmark of those wines made by Justin Meyer in the day]; these components continue on and are joined by cigar box, cedar laced black currant and blackberry; past mid palate, the fruit started to dissipate and it finished a bit dry.

1996 MORAGA ESTATE CALIFORNIA RED MORAGA BEL AIR- from a vineyard just off of the infamous I-405 freeway near Sunset Blvd in the west end of the LA area, this highly respected winery has produced some remarkable wines over the years since inception in 1989; this Bordeaux blend offered some tertiary notes of prunes, minerals and graphite aromas with a taste profile of earth, smoke, tart black currant and almost stewed cherry; this bottle definitely had passed its prime and was undoubtedly a poor representative of the original wine; interestingly, my palate was jaded as the group got it as their fav in the flight; I went back for seconds and got more of the same initial characteristics and dumped.

1986 BEAULIEU VINEYARD [BV] GEORGES de LATOUR CABERNET SAUVIGNON PRIVATE RESERVE- the nose on this gave off some vanilla milk, spice, talc and an earth component; the taste included an initial sweet blackberry which finished off on the tart side; past mid palate, it was losing it and lost a lot of the pizzazz it possessed earlier; most got something similar as it was voted last in the flight; I`m thinking this was not the best bottle of that vintage.

2005 RUDD CROSSROADS OAKVILLE CABERNET SAUVIGNON AKA RUDD ESTATE OAKVILLE CABERNET SAUVIGNON- the nose was a nice and inviting wild black currant and blackberry fruit which continued on and was joined by a more on the sweet side of the wildness along with some black cherry and a touch of talc; it had good mouthfeel being soft and smooth; for me, it showed decently and I scored it #2 in its flight.

2006 CLARK-CLAUDON VINEYARDS ESTATE CABERNET SAUVIGNON NAPA- showing quite well, this had a load of black cherry that was very profound from the aromatics on through; it was not a fruit bomb, but there was a lot that showed up as black currant and blackberry notes chimed in along with some cedar, dark chocolate and spice; the liquid soft texture carried all of the goodies to the back end for a delyed finish; it was full bodied and yet had a degree of elegance that made for an even greater treat; my #1 in its flight and thankfully so since I have a few more in the cellar; no, I did not recognize it.

2000 MOUNT EDEN VINEYARDS CUVEE SARATOGA CABERNET SAUVIGNON SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS- from this historically stellar producer comes a wine of similar stellarness; I liked the spicy leather cranberry notes in the nose and the smoky black currant fruit that came in early; the smoke continued all the way through which I found strange unless there were fires in the area prior to harvest mindful of some of the wines that came out of Anderson Valley in 08` where lightening strikes produced vineyard inundated smokiness; there were still enough redeeming qualities in the wine to make it a decent drink; my #3 in its flight.

2007 CHIMNEY ROCK CABERNET SAUVIGNON STAGS LEAP DISTRICT- the nose had nice fresh dark fruit to offer plus a strong sense of oak which shows up throughout and is not yet fully integrated; the taste profile had a lot of welcomed tasty black cherry which was followed by the onset of black currant; the fruit dissipated a bit and the wine finished dry; we all got it about middle of its flight.

2007 CORNERSTONE CELLARS CABERNET SAUVIGNON NAPA- the aromatics contained inviting rich, ripe dark fruit notes which turned out to be more of black cherry and blackberry with a bit of plum and blueberry; there was some sandalwood and vanilla toast by mid palate that dominated from there on out; the oakiness was reason for me to downgrade it knowing full well this has appeal to many in our group and which was confirmed ss it was voted #! In the flight; it was my 3 of 5.

2010 TURNBULL WINE CELLARS ESTATE CABERNET SAUVIGNON NAPA- after the youthful, rich and vibrant purple color comes red and dark fruit aromatics that consists of red cherry, black cherry and olallieberry which when tasted are very sweet; then the black cherry takes over with a larger degree of intensity at the end with a touch of Smith Brother`s cough syrup flavor showing up.

2012 ROBERTS + ROGER CABRNET SAUVIGNON HOWELL MOUNTAIN- 15.4% abv; earth and talc are prevalent in the nose, then a huge hit of oak comes in and prevails along with sandalwood, vanilla toast and the most apparent fruit profile of black cherry, plum and blueberry; it needs time to integrate and mature as well as simmer down; it`s big and bold and discombobulated at this stage.

I always fine blind tasting to be interesting and informative as they take out so much subjectivism. The key is to have all hold onto their comments until the proper time in order to come up with an unbiased opinion and then discuss after voting.

Cheers,
Blake
IMG_1489.JPG
IMG_1487.JPG
IMG_1490.JPG

more:
IMG_1496.JPG
IMG_1502.JPG
IMG_1495.JPG

Nice tasting and notes. It’s great to see Clark Claudon show well. It seems to be a slightly under-the-radar producer these days. I must admit, I haven’t bought in a while, but your note gives me pause. Still one of the very best experiences I’ve had in CA Wine Country was the release picnic for the 2001 Clark Claudon vintage, and a late evening ride through the vineyards with them. Great folks.

Brandon, I totally agree with you, Clark-Claudon does put out some good wines and has since the beginning which I was fortunate to be exposed to by a friend who connected with Tom and Laurie when they first got started.

They have gone through many changes since then and seem to be hitting stride now. I have liked most of the older vintages more recently that upon release. I entered this wine into the blind tasting to see how I liked it more objectively and my notes reflect I did indeed like it.

I fondly remember doing a retrospective tasting at their home in 03 where we tasted from 92 [not released] through 00. 93 was the first release. The 95` was my fav on that occasion.

THANK YOU for doing the tasting blind!!! We all need to do that more. Label prejudice often gets in the way, no matter how much of a wine geek you are.

Todd, this monthly group was formed in 1988 by a friend, myself and 3 others to do just that, taste wines blind and get impressions as objectively as we can. That proved to me how much bias I had been using in making buying decisions and I still have to be careful to avoid it.

One more point about tasting wines blind. Back in about 1990, I took a bottle of Meridian Cabernet from the 87 vintage and poured it into an empty bottle of 85 Latour. Guess what wine came in first in an open tasting of First Growths?

Yes, I was called a few names after revealing the truth and have not done that again although I`ve been tempted.

BTW, the 87` Meridian was a very good, under the radar, cheap wine that got raves from the Spectator et al.

Nice notes, too bad about the BV, some of the 80s wines can be very good. Next time you’re in LA, let me know and we can play a round and have another dinner!

Thanks Tom. I had the thought the BV may not have been cellared properly after finding out who brought it.
Hope all is well with you and life is good.

Tom and Laurie are great and generous. I have a magnum of the '95 which is a birth year wine for my daughter.

I agree, Tom & Laurie are righteously good people. Good move on the purchase. In magnum form, it should stand up against the test of time.

Would you say you liked the 2010 Turnbull?
Have you had the 12 and if so what do you think ?
I have 4 left of a 6 pack of the 12 and tried the 10
Recently.

Karl, I diid not like it all that much. It was more one dimensional being excessively fruit with the sweetness factor almost overwhelming. I have not had any other Turnbull Cabs, but I hope yours are good as 2012 was a really good vintage from this area.

I thought your note on the 10 was interesting.
I had it and felt it was a bit along the lines of what you said.

I like the 12 but feel the good Turnbull’s are the Oakville and reserve.
They are a little pricey for me.

Have you ever heard of Lieff Cabernet Auberge Road Vineyard?
It’s also a 2010 and I have a few but haven’t tried yet.

Thanks for the tasting notes.

Karl, I appreciate your remarks. Turnbull`s estate wines can be labeled Oakville or Napa depending upon the vintage so we have to watch out; we could be talking the same wine with a different vintage label. That is not the case for the 2010. As to Lieff, I have no experience with their wines.

Hi Blake
Yes…it can be a bit confusing for sure.
No, the Oakville I mean is the other higher end one.
I still have yet to see one of the ones labeled as such.
They seem to be getting some pretty high marks lately on their better wines.
Thanks for the reply Blake.

great notes

Karl, I looked it up on Wine Searcher and this is what they have to say about the name and place: “Depending on the vintage, this wine may be labeled as either Oakville or Napa Valley.” I do not have ant experience with any other vintages so I do not know which ones this refers to.

Thanks Blake

Just got an email today from K&L that shows: “2013 Turnbull “Oakville” Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon 95 $69.99”.