I was reading back through 3 very long and interesting threads here, the Premier Cru, the Allan Meadows and the Rudy thread and it struck me how similar the arguments of some of the defenders of the villains (AM, PC, Acker, etc) were to the blatant sexist mansplaining you see in areas like tech, gamergate etc. Do we have our own verb, winesplaining?
wine·splain
manˈsplān
verb informal
gerund or present participle: winesplaining
(willfully ignorant wine snob) explaining (something) to a wine board that defies facts and logic, in a manner regarded as condescending or patronizing.
"I’m reading a post where a guy winesplains how John Kapon was the victim of market forces.
Some hall of fame quotes (note some are just plain sexist, but help sell my point):
From Premier Cru thread: "The vengeance and vitriole of the repeat attacks on PC in this thread by scads of those in the business (who have long lost business to PC and disliked them for going outside the bankrupt three tier system) suggests to me that its likely ITB folks and a few morons who didn’t understand the PC model of buy on future and be patient who complained to Wine-Searcher. "
“The simplest and most likely explanation is that all wines purchased by PC are pre-arrival initially…To say this is evidence of nefarious business practices requires a leap of logic that baffles me.”
“Do we have confirmation of the bounced check(s)? I know it’s been alleged, but has anyone who’s posted here received one? (Ariamali, put your hand down, we’re not calling on you.)…people change jobs all the time and it’s usually not a sign that a business is about to go belly up. Is the turnover at PC significantly higher than at their industry peers? If not, then the departure of one or more employees doesn’t by itself mean much at all. Maureen’s very brief entry into this thread tells us nothing since she herself hasn’t offered any useful information, either about her activities in this matter or about Premier Cru itself.”
" I like Maureen, I’ve met her, I respect her work greatly and have reached out to her on a couple occasions and she’s been very helpful. But one thing I will say is that she has a tendency to name-drop her closeness to the FBI, federal prosecutors, etc. in order to sound impressive, whether or not she is actually actively involved in any specific investigation"
“Again, you seem to be mistaking your characterization of an issue for the objective truth about that issue; you’re also making the unproven(!) assumption that you’re wiser than the many satisfied PC customers. It must frustrate you no end that people can be so dense that they simply cannot appreciate your interpretation of their reality.”
"Just because a person filed a lawsuit does not make their claim correct or winnable. Ask one of the numerous lawyers on the board about that. I imagine we’d all be surprised at how many suits are filed against the companies we work with, or buy products from everyday. "
“and let’s not forget for all he is ACCUSED of, Rudy was among the most generous openers of wine the world has known, anyone who opens alot, inevitably is let down for a variety of reasons, only one of which is incorrect label to wine presentation.”
“I’m sure what you say is true Maureen, but you have a style of communication that I really struggle with. Maybe (probably) it’s just me but a little more humility would be attractive. Being a good winner is important.”
“Since my post someone is showing that burghound still does events with Acker which is nice secondary information but it is still not of importance. It seems the assumption is acker pays off burghound to make high scores on fake wine and to me it isn’t rational as burghound isn’t going to give up his career. But again moreover just as no one else would want done to them what has been to burghound here I think it is unethical to try to disparage a person where there aren’t facts.”
“Yeah. Nobody has ever criticized “male wine experts” on this board.”