As of today Delectable now sports ads between user submissions and also pop ups when you attempt to add a wine. Next they will say, “Want to lose the ads, spend $x/mo.”
Antonio didn’t mention that in his interview, only that for $5.99/mo you can get Vinous scores on Delectable wines as well. So now even if you didn’t want them you will need to pay for them in order to keep the user interface ad free and enjoyable? Users built that app and made it what it is. Congratulations, here’s your bill.
$72 per year seems steep - is this in addition to the Vinous subscription?
My Print Edition Subscription to The Washington Post is $14.99 per month and it comes with daily content, all sorts of apps, reviews etc. just as a reference point.
Digital only is $9.99 per month.
I’ll be interested to see if people are willing to pay. That said, he may have priced it that high because the ad revenue is worth more to him.
You can cheap out and get CellarTracker for free. I make a donation based on the size of my cellar. Works out to $3.00 a month, and I’m very happy with all the extra information I’m able to access.
$72 a year seems excessive. I watched the segment on CBS.
But you still have to subscribe to Vinous to get his reviews. I hope this new tie-in with Delectable doesn’t impact the CT tie in. Not that I subscribe to Vinous, but I don’t want to see the value of CT diminished for others
That’s a shame. Mind you I never bother to update my apps and don’t see myself doing it any time in the near future… in any case I have an add-blocker so all I’ll see is a blank space on my screen.
I had a bunch of issues with the app UI already (tagging/untagging people, reviews showing up in the comments, basic workflow inconsistencies, etc), but I stuck with it for the social aspect.
However, paying for it to avoid being peppered with ads is not worth it for me, given the issues mentioned above. It’s hard to find value in this.