I had a 1999 Jamet at a restaurant in DC a number of years ago when it was still reasonably priced and everyone at the table was BLOWN away by the aromatics and taste of the wine. I would take that kind of syrah everyday if I could find it at a reasonable price. The olive character was mesmerizing.
As for aging, I loved the 2005 on release, and I have been following it since then, being less and less impress every year. Although it might be in a dull phase, I am not sure about the aging potential.
The 2010 on the contrary seemed not ready at all, and needs cellaring IMHO.
I love N. Rhones! I look for a savory, silky quality, with red fruits, some acid and, of course, the ethereal red fruit, bacon fat, and floral aromas.
I like Gonon, Champet, Burgaud, Delas, Jasmin & P. Gaillard. Iāve enjoyed some Guigal wines from the 8oās. Iām not so oak sensitive, but I donāt see any overuse of oak in Gaillardās wines. Recently had some '99 & '01 cote-roties from him and, with 10-15 years of bottle age, the wines seem more red fruit & acid driven. Iām not a fan of too much olive notes in wine.
Iāve enjoyed some Guigal La-Laās, Jamet and Chave Hermitage, but canāt afford these wines right now. I think Jaboulet La Chapelle is over priced & over rated.
Iāve tried many California syrah, but the only ones that come close to a N. Rhone style to me is Peay & Cabot. I donāt like the high alcohol, over extracted and unbalanced qualities in some Cali syrah. Thatās my take!
I think the diversity in styles and palates here is quite interesting. While Kevin and others do not enjoy the La Las I have never been wowed by Rostaing nor Chapoutier. I am sure others quite like those producers. Yes, I have tried ones with age from great years but they simply donāt hit my sweet spot and never have consistently.
Can anyone else comment on how Rostaingās style compares with the styles of other producers being discussed? I have very little experience with any of these wines (unfortunately ā going to try to change that), so this is a very interesting discussion for me.
This is not in the Allemand/Chave category of seriousness, but Iāve been deriving huge pleasure from the fruity, sappy St. Josephs of Barou. We had the 2011 last night, which is a bit lighter than the 2010, but so yummy ā just chuggable. Itās pretty inky but the tannins are light and soft and it has very pure syrah flavors. The fruit would appeal to a New World palette, but itās balanced and has no candied quality. Great bang for the buck at $19.
Rostaing leans toward the modern, but I believe he uses less new wood now than he did in the 80s and 90s. His wines have a finesse, but I confess Iāve never had an aged one that really wowed me. They always seem to fall a little short.
I like the integration of savory components with red fruits and strong acid. That is the entire appeal for me. Interesting to drink and killer at the dinner table.
To sound flakey Rostaing never speaks to me. But to be more analytical they never seem to develop that wonderful balance of meats and olive that I enjoy and is found in spades in Jamet (and old, pre '95 Ogier). Yet the Guigal Las Las are often not that way either but they seem to reach that high pinnacle that I never find Rostaings delivers on. Same for Chapoutier. Certainly they are both good to very good but never have I encountered a wow wine that leaves a lasting impression on me. I am always left with a sense of āglossinessā which likely only has useful meaning to me.
Beyond the basic Brune et Blonde Cote Rotie, much Guigal is oak soup to me. The 98 B et B was drinking very well, albeit still young from a mag a few weeks ago. Chapoutier and Jaboulet generally speaking, meh. Iāve enjoyed Burgaud, Ogier, Levet, Jasmin, Jamet, Rostaing, Duclaux, Gerin, Gallet, Guigal, Voge, Clape, Texier, Chave, Clusel Roch, Allemand etc. over the years. I enjoy some of the bigger (new style?) wines as long as the oak is integrated and the extraction is not taken over the top. The taste and aroma of oak in N. Rhones and Red Burgs is off-putting to me. Still favor traditional Jasmin and Jamet. I could drink those every day. Well, maybe not, but anyway, you get my point.
This is a great thread thanks for posting. There are several producers mentioned that I will have to seek out.
I use the term and to me it is a sense of something a little too polished, giving a sense of being superficial. Perhaps manipulated or at least lacking the more rustic characters that the tannin and acids in these kinds of wine can show without the overbearing presence of oak. That what you mean approximately?
Yes we use the terms similarly. I donāt get into the cause of such a descriptor at all. Wines that exhibit those traits leave me without much of a sense of place or character.
Iād guess that oak sensitivity is the key factor in whether certain board members are big fans of the la las. Some have lambasted them on this thread, which I think is also a touch fashionable since there is a correlation to high scores from Robert Parker who, as we know, must be wrong. This board is also dominated by a large contingent of burgundy and riesling fans who generally favor lighter acid driven wines than dense, massive wines. That leads to a number of fans of lighter norther rhones like Gonon, Jamet, and Ogier.
I have to say that Iām a fan of most of those wines, though I believe an occasional vintage of Ogier can get a little acid heavy. I am a big fan of Chave, a fan of some of Chapoutierās wines, and a fan of the La Las. I drink a large amount of Napa cabernet, followed by burgundy and oregon pinot. I think that the heavy dose of Napa in my diet reflects a palate preference towards the larger side of the spectrum, though thatās only partially true in many regions. Iāve got my limits, believe me.
Even so, I do not find the oak on my La las to be overwhelming or disturbing. Iāve found most of the La Las from the 70s-90s (Iāve not had the 91 though) to be pretty damn wonderful. I think the oak integrates quite well, and that with age, the wines develop an incredible density and complexity that is simply stunning. Iāve had them blind many times mixed in with top tier wines from around the world, and they frequently come in near the top of the tasting for me, and others. Since weāre talking blind, all the bullshit about points and Parker is out the window. To some, they are simply incredible wines that explode with complexity.
Barou is terrific. The VdP has got to be the best $13 syrah in the world. Even with shipping to the west coast itās a great value. Imported by Chambers St, so not available (that Iām aware of) elsewhere.
Thanks, Michael. I have been eyeing it out of total curiosity, wondering if I could bag another knock-out QPR for daily drinking in the Domaine Guion price-range. Have you tried the whites as well? My likely $13 prices for easy, but quality, slurping.
In the 90ies Philippe Guigal took over step by step, but he didnĀ“t change much (as far as IĀ“m concerned), except longing for riper fruit in the negoce grapes, and introduce the Ch. dĀ“Ampuis ā¦
Last year I made a comprehensive LaLa-tasting with 15 Guigal crus - and 15 other wines (Rostaing, Ogier, Jamet, Gerin ā¦) - several great wines made also by the latter group (Cote blonde 1999, Belle Helene 1997 ā¦), but rarely any disapointing Guigal ā¦ 1994 and older drinking beautifully (certainly not oaky), 1997 soon coming along ā¦
I disagree somewhat.
While Rostaing isnĀ“t working as traditionally (some may say old fashioned) as his uncle Marius Gentaz and his Father in law Albert Dervieux he is far from modern.
He uses less and less new oak (15-20 % maximum), aging in demi muids and larger fudres, rarely in barriques, he prefers harvesting at the perfect time, avoiding sur-mautuity and maintaining lively acidity,
he destems partially, he uses roto-tanks (but very sensibly), he doesnĀ“t filter but does a very light fining ā¦
The wines are always very elegant, perfect at the table, accessable quite early but holding for 20-25+ years ā¦
no fruit bombs, not oaky at all, and very typical for the terroir (in fact all wines are treated likewise, all differences due to the vineyard ), with the Cote blonde - and also La Landonne - usually very fine.