If these wines really are styled like LaLa’s, then the tasting might be seriously premature. I think I remember having a 2010 Chateau D’Ampuis a year ago that was just a mouthful of oak. I got the impression from Chris that these wines were done omewhat explicitly in that style, though perhaps I am misinterpreting. In any case, I hadn’t had plans to touch mine for years so I’m very curious to see what you think when you taste them this young.
This was a really fun experience that I don’t think I’ll ever have the pleasure of doing again (though I certainly wish I could in a few years and you’ll soon see why)
I opened all the wines about 5 hrs before we started tasting through them. I did end up serving them in flights by designation (“one”, “two”, “three”).
I did not take formal notes as I was hosting and enjoying the company I was with but here are my impressions for what they’re worth:
The 11’s are in a great place right now. Completely balanced and integrated, they were a real pleasure to drink.
The 12’s really stuck out with their oak when compared to their 11 counterparts. I’m not sure what my impression would have been if we had had only the 12’s but next to the 11’s they came across as a bit unbalanced right now. I personally would hold these.
The 13’s are really dense, layered and extraordinary wines. They are superior to the 12’s but the oak was still prominent. The balance did feel better (especially the '13 “three”) but I would still recommend holding these for an additional year or two.
Across the board the 11’s were preferred to the other wines in the flights (save for the '13 “three” which is a wow wine). Seeing where the first exposition iteration ended up after a few extra years has me convinced to hold my remaining 12 and 13 sets for the time being.