To me, the term “Burgundian” is a state of mind more than a specific set of aromas and flavors. A philosophy where site expression is paramount. A balance of fruit and acid and tannin with none of these taking over center stage. Intensity on the palate and grip on the finish, but without a sense of heaviness in either. Low-to-moderate alcohol because that is how site-derived nuances and complexities of a favored site can be captured. An absence of individualistic, assertive winemaking signature, as this would compete with the voice of the land. Celebration of the fact that the best wines are from the best sites, and acceptance that one cannot make great wine from average sites.
Your mileage may vary.
By the construct defined above, Rhys is unquestionably “Burgundian”. But is it even more than that… Is it actually like good Burgundy? Can Rhys be interchanged with the best that Burgundy has to offer? Two wines were decanted for an hour and tasted single blind…
Domaine Louis Jadot 2006 Gevrey-Chambertin 1er Cru Clos Saint-Jacques
Decanter A is medium ruby. Fresh on the nose with spiced cherry fruit and earthy nuance, lovely. Sap and sweet red fruit and energy in the mouth. Slightly leaner than the wine from decanter B, which is a bit richer. Satin texture and intense on the palate, then on to a long red finish, spicy and rocky with iron nuance. It’s early days for this, but outstanding wine, potentially exceptional in 6-8 years. Clos Saint-Jacques is an extraordinary vineyard, a quasi-grand cru IMO, and this ’06 Jadot is a fine example of the cru.
Rhys Vineyards 2006 Alpine Vineyard Pinot Noir, Santa Cruz Mountains
Decanter B is darker red. Beguiling perfume of plumy dark fruit with spices and floral notes. Dark plums on the palate, lifted by acidity, complexed by earth and stones, especially on the very long finish. The texture is silk. A rich wine with sweeter fruit than the other, but not heavy. Drinks well already with a hour or two of decanting, but seems set to age for several more years and maybe much longer. Outstanding.
The bottom line: For the first two hours, there were scant clues to country of origin. I could guess (but could not be certain) that red-fruited wine A was the CSJ with its earth and iron. I could guess wine B was Rhys because we did not have a top-flight Vosne-Romanee in the lineup. But if a younger edition of the exceptional Sylvain Cathiard 2001 Vosne-Romanee Les Malconsorts that I drank a few days ago were an option, I might well have guessed that! In other words, I certainly could not say one of these wines was clearly from California and the other from Burgundy. They were really quite similar in shape and profile, despite the specific detail differences between the two.
In the third hour, the Jadot clenched down, while the Rhys remained open and generous. On day 2, the Jadot was open and singing again, while the sweeter fruit of the Rhys seemed slightly gaudy and obvious, perhaps a wee bit cloying, which absolutely was not the case on day 1. But at age 4.5 years, it is day 1 that counts, not day 2. It was easy for me to see why folks often compare Rhys directly to some of the best young Burgs. As for what happens a little further down the line, well, we will have to wait a while to see.