Good pickup on your part Warren. In both cases, the blind wines were big and bold and super rich with what I seemingly detected as oak influence.
Also in both cases, I was with folks who are in a blind tasting group where we share our perceptions and guesses as to what we think the wine is. Otherwise, I’d just be keeping that in the back of my mind.
2008 JEAN MICHEL CUVEE SPECIALE EXTRA BRUT- a blend of 50% Pinot Meunier and 50% Chardonnay; bottled 4/2010; disgorged 11/2019, dosed at 1 gpl; from 7 different crus in Moussy and neighboring communes; this undergoes at least 8-10 years on the lees after the harvest; the nose showcased its serious citrus notes with lemon zest most prominent; the taste profile was more of honeyed grapefruit with lesser compliments of yellow apple, pear and lemon; it was full bodied, very rich and creamy and its hallmark may have been its bright acidity that bordered on being bracing; it certainly had the power and thrust of the 2008 vintage and as such, is another excellent bubbly that comes out of that vintage providing immense pleasure.
I saw this at Costco yesterday and picked up a couple bottles, not knowing what to expect. It got off to a rough start, coming across as a bit screechy, not unlike an AM car radio that can’t lock on a station and oscillates between a news cast and old time country music. As it warmed and took on air, it broadened, had FM stereo clarity, and then continued to rapidly gain complexity, body and interest, until it was broadcasting a Beethoven symphony in 4-D, psychedelic space. This was not a manic, anxiogenic psychedelic space, with the feeling of having your soul ripped apart, but was more akin to being in a colorful meadow, and with every step you take, you leave a dramatic kaleidoscope of color in your wake,. It would, however, flirt with the edge of that abyss, and then gracefully settle back down.
Full bodied and creamy, constructed on a core of Lemon Curd, with literally all the nuances in the flavor wheel posted above sprinkled across the palate like some kind of fairy dust, and finishing with an authoritative smoky bacon note. Not what I was expecting for $49.99.
Apologies for the tortured metaphors. Now if you will excuse me, I am going back to Costco to buy as many as I can fit in my car.
Blend of 2014/2018 Disgorged 12/21/21 100% Pinot Meunier 0g/L dosage
Limestone and citrus nose, bright, oyster shell, flint, lemon, persistent mousse, rich with a hint of green apple and honey, minerally finish, fresh acidity, lovely wine.
2012 Pierre Gimonnet & Fils Champagne Special Club Grands Terroirs de Chardonnay
I typically avoid Special Club wines due to the bottle size. Somehow, I have two of these (in magnum racks). I really wish I hadn't liked it so much. While it's barely entering a prime drinking window, it's already a very fine wine. Dense brioche intermixed with orange, lemon, yellow apple, apricot. Energetic and long. I loved it (but still won't buy SC bottles).
This champagne bottle suffered label damage during shipping, but the contents were never the less exceptional. Disgorged in 2022, it offered rich, creamy flavor and with more air contact lost the baby fat and gained in complexitx. With 6g/l dosage I think the 7 Crus crus will age well and gain in depth and complexity over 4-5 years of cellaring
Yesterday I had a good sized group over to the house, with a # of us being a part of the Board here. We had about 20-25 Champagnes, and I haven’t got to do my notes yet but I did make an effort this morning while I had the opportunity to taste the Mousse Mon Village perpetual side by side, using the leftover bottles from yesterday. You will note how I coded these for Cellartracker. Maybe this is too much detail, a little too nerdy, but if we’re to compare wines that are similar, and especially this one which is a perpetual build beginning back in 2014, then we gotta have some definitive way to know which base wine we are talking about. So, hence the wine names I created.
For what it’s worth, both base versions are (well, they were a few weeks back) available at Woodland Hills Wine for $55. If you are moved or interested by my notes, and it you decide to order from them, make sure you tell them which base you want, which is identifiable on the bottle’s back label. Of note too @Brian_Tuite has posted just a little bit above mine here with his experience with the 2018.
@Brian_G_r_a_f_s_t_r_o_m …this is probably what we should have done yesterday to compare these wines, a side by side like I did this morning. Funny enough, I never tasted the 2018 yesterday, which was in the “5*” bag. It’s the only bottle I missed!
NV Moussé Fils Champagne Les Vignes De Mon Village (perpetual 2014 - 2018) - France, Champagne (5/14/2023)
We tasted this 2018 base, along with the 2019 base, both blind as part of a larger Champagne event I hosted yesterday. I decided to retain these two wines to retaste this morning after breakfast, as I had just enough time to revisit just these. Before I add my note for this 2018 base, it's kinda ironic that the only wine I didn't get to yesterday was the 2018--it's just listed with the bottle identified in my notes but blank with a note next to it. Of note too, this is the third bottle of the 2018 base I have had in the past month, and this bottle reminds me of the high caliber of the very first bottle 4 weeks ago. 100% Pinot Meunier from around the village, no dosage. Mineral aroma, with a concentrated and spicy core that is backed up by a lemon profile., with some peach buried alongside it, plus a touch of oxidized apple. There is a lot of concentration here, and it seems very wound up, finishing with some mineral spine. I'd offer that my note here should have good clarity, as I tasted this without food, and with just the 2019 alongside it, at room temp (68f). My hunch is that this 2018 base is gonna last a good while, fed by plenty of energy.
NV Moussé Fils Champagne Les Vignes De Mon Village (perpetual 2014 -2019) - France, Champagne (5/14/2023)
Tasted blind yesterday, then retasted this morning, alongside the 2018 base (which is the previous year's disgorgement from the same perpetual). Yesterday the wine was slotted blind into a larger tasting, with no knowledge of where it was in the lineup. Most of the wines had a a good cool temp on them, I presume this one did too. Of note, of the 20 or so wines we did yesterday, this 2019 base was one of the very few that I starred as in my Top 3 (which occurred prior to the reveal so there was no bias in my selection, for what it's worth). 100% Pinot Meunier, no dosage, from vines around the village. Juicy and fruity. Good mix of fruit, acid and dosage (although I need to emphasize that this cuvee is without dosage). Candied lime, complete and very enjoyable are my notes. I then retasted both the 2018 and 2019 base bottles this morning after breakfast, with both wines at a room temp of around 68f. This morning the 2019 base feels more unctuous, especially next to the power and wound up nature of the 2018 base. The 2019 seems more polished to me (what I called 'complete' yesterday). Nectarine, yellow apple and even a sensation of honey (remember, this is a no dosage perpetual). It kinda reminds me of a Chardonnay profile, given the yellow apple and some cool orange flesh. Suave, I'd say a bit less acid than the 2018 base, a real pleasure to drink. Overall, at least in this side by side of both, I'd recommend to age the 2018 base for longer, and enjoy the 2019 base now, for its real pleasure it shows.
The problem with using psychedelics two days in a row is tachyphalaxis. And sure enough, the experience with a second bottle of this proved to be significantly muted, at least until the last third of the bottle, when I did finally break through. The last third of this bottle was pure magic, however.
Information about this estate and this bottle is hard to come by, but the one piece of information I did find, stated this bottle spends 12 years on the lees.
Frank,
After the reveals we did pull them off to the side and tried them side-by-side. We had pretty similar impressions. The 19 showed brighter, and perhaps more Chardonnay-like, whereas the 18 is a bit more in the lower register, and spoke more clearly of Pinot Meunier. I preferred the 19.