The 2007 is better wine to drink now and is more open and giving. The 2006 is between ok and good but not as good as the vineyard address would suggest it should be.
Hard to calibrate, but maybe you can compare vintages… I have been sampling through a batch of 2002 Forey and found it really transformed positively for my tastes between 20 and 23 years of age. Maybe that '08 will get there with air but it is just shy of that age now.
2006 Potel was good not great already 5y ago.
2007 might be totally mature, but haven’t had it.
I guess 08 Forey is still a bit structured.
2002 Potel was a great wine.
Not sure it ever will be. I opened this and a few of the '05 Potel VRs this year, all bought on release, and every single one of them had something go chemically wrong. Mute, stale fruit and inconsistent pigment from the top to bottom of the bottle. Never experienced this with anything else and don’t know what it is.
I had a three pack of half bottles of the 07 Potel. The first bottle sometime around 2012 was medium body, and there was a little kaleidoscopic magical component to it even though it was a touch light. I open the second bottle about six months ago at a tasting that we drank overtime in the first pour was good like a 91 but it faded within an hour. Because of that, I drink the second bottle about two months ago and it was an off bottle. Hopefully this has a lot to do with being a half bottle.
Apologies but as a single-minded guy (troll?), whenever Gaudichots pops up I have to ask: we know Machard de Gramont owns part of the vineyard, but there is zero information about them on line. I have a couple bottles I’ve enjoyed and would love to know if anyone knows anything about their methods or philosophy beyond “organic.” And note, Domaine Machard de Gramont is not Domaine Bertrand + Axelle Machard de Gramont.