For myself this has changed several times over the years. My first love was Chateauneuf du Pape, then Napa and Bordeaux. Most recently it was Barolo but I find myself migrating South to Campagnia. I still love all these wines but I find myself most excited by Aglianico these days.
Chambolle is certainly one of my favorite villages also. But it is really the great complexity of the Cote d’Or that puts it so much ahead other regions. There’s a whole world there and even if you never saw a wine from outside of it you could be really happy. I’m not saying that I don’t love wines from elsewhere. I do love Piedmont, Northern Rhone, Champagne and many Riesling regions among others, but none of these, IMHO, offers the kind of diversity Cote d’Or does.
Burgundy by a small margin over Barbaresco and Barolo. That said I alos regularly drink and love CDP, NRs, Brunello, Chianti, BDX and Rioja too along with the occassional selective CA versions like Mount Eden and Dominus.
I don’t think I could choose just three “favorite regions.” There’s so many that I completely love, there’s no way to narrow it down.
Now certainly my buying goes in cycles. I think that’s mostly a matter of discovering a new region and deciding that I need to backfill, and/or being priced out of old favorites.
Madeira.
Nothing has the history of these wines. There is a wide variety of styles from bone dry to dessert sweet. And it is the most complex-tasting material that can be ingested, legal or not.
CdP was my first love in wine, for no better reason that it’s the first wine that was interesting enough to get me interested in learning more, and my studying and tasting focused on the Rhône. I had never studied at all the geography of the Bay Area, but when I moved out here I made a map of the wineries I like and found they are predominantly in Sonoma. Meeting the people and seeing the places has added another dimension to my enjoyment, so today I’m voting Sonoma.
Michel, we should get together for a drink sometime