What Goodfellow/Matello are you drinking?

2010 Hommage

Damn, this was good! I took Marcus’s advice not to decant and instead pour and taste throughout the evening. Somewhat unusual for a Goodfellow in that it was deliciously open from the first sip and remained consistently giving and gracious to the last drop. Dark and savory. To my tastes, it is at the beginning of a great drinking window with 5+ years ahead of it. I’m flogging myself for not getting more when I had the chance. This is a big step up from the Lazarus a few weeks ago.

Pro tip: Pairs great with 3rd day old rooster soup. :rooster:

4 Likes

yes :heart:

It’s good to be the first rooster. Not so much after that…

Hi Brian,

To me the 2022s as a whole have a pretty delicious early window. The fruit is popping and the Goodfellow tannins are there but with the bright fruit it’s a nice balance. I think the 2022s will shut down similarly to 2018 (which had a lovely early window).

The Long has more pop than the vineyard designate and smells fantastic. But it’s the smallest cuvee of the vintage, so if you have another 2022 I would hold the Long. It will be great at the 9-10 year mark.

I am 100% on this for 2018. Not just ours, but most of what I’ve tasted recently have been in the dumb phase. 2017s are peeking out and showing lots of potential, hopefully 2018 will be on a similar schedule.

1 Like

Grammar sucks. It was a three day old soup made with an old rooster. It got progressively Better each day.

Thanks Marcus. I bought 4 bottles so I don’t mind opening one now. I was just being cautious after I had the Cuvee Russ and it was totally shut down. Wasn’t sure if this was due to the difference in site or if the 2022 SVDs were starting to close up on the whole.

1 Like

They may be moving towards shutting down. I was a bit surprised about your Cuvee Russ note. The previous CT notes had seemed to enjoy the wine as youthful but not really shut down. It’s been a bit since we’ve opened the Long Acre as it sold out pretty quickly. But I feel the Whistling Ridge and Temperance Hill bottlings are delicious. The West Field continues to be delicious to my palate (bright fruit, juicy, and the tannins just add an amaro quality.

The two Heritage wines continue to sho well, the No. 21 just smells fantastic with some air, the palate is a little tight.

My friends and I enjoyed the West Field three weeks ago, along side the 2013 Whistling Ridge, 2014 Bishop Creek, and 2015 Heritage #4 (also opened and enjoyed a 2018 Glennon Chardonnay (made by Marcus). We loved all of them and all were open for business. Here’s what I posted about the '22 West Field:

“That 2022 West Field is the first really ‘young’ Goodfellow that I’ve had that was really open for business, and it too was just wonderful. One of the pretty unique notes on the nose was an herbal thing all of us were trying to identify (reminded various folks of marjoram, tarragon, an Herbs de Provence thing, etc., going on) and which we all loved.”

I don’t remember whether I’ve opened any other 2022 . . . but am now tempted to open one or both of the Whistling Ridge or Temperance Hill (before the begin their slumber). :wine_glass:

3 Likes

I should probably list a couple of things we’ve opened recently that are showing really well.

2013 Whistling Ridge has added a layer of fruit weight that is really nice. Day one the tannins are a little forward. Day two it was more in the zone and the nose really evolved well. Megan really liked it on Day 4, it was quieter by then but very integrated. I was definitely surprised by it’s longevity from when it was opened.

2017 “Ramato” Pinot Gris this was really delicious at 7 years. Bright fresh florals and citrus rind hints of light red berries and then a great blood orange/kumquat finish.

3 Likes

You’ve mentioned tannin a few times in recent posts. So far I have only had the WV Pinot Noir for Goodfellow reds but the tannins are one of the first things I noticed. I was very happy with their presence and overall feel which gives nice structure to the wine. I know some people want pure silk in their PN but I prefer some grip so long as it isn’t coarse.
I imagine it’s combination of factors from vineyard site to pick date to punch downs and more. I would love to hear anything you would be willing to share as to what you’re aiming for and how you go about getting it. Also, at what points is it easy to screw things up and get tannins that are too chunky?

I was making a joke referring to most old school farms usually having one rooster, and rarely a second one longer than it takes to get him to “soup size”.

Had a Heritage No. 4 as one of many wines opened for my dad’s 85th yesterday, and it was terrific. I decanted for about 3 hours before pouring.

3 Likes

This is serious thread drift, but over one week we lost one chicken to a hawk and three chickens to an opossum all while the rooster did nothing. So we restocked on hens and got a new rooster. The old rooster was tasty. He had one job…

6 Likes

I feel as you do, I like tannins and aim for more tannins, seeking tannins that aren’t clunky or overtly bitter.

I also generally am happier with more tannin than less. That came about from routinely seeing and often tasting great old world wines from Burgundy, Bordeaux, and Piedmont, and realizng that the common thread for these regions was the tannins (pre-global warming and pre-Michelle Rolland). All three regions really had sigificant tannin requiring cellar aging to get the best expressions. They also had the most multi-layered set of components and when aged often produced such an amazing aromatic expression of tertiary non fruit qualities matched only by a few other areas like the Northern Rhone and a few great Rioja producers (again tannins).

There are many great white wines and leas tannic reds that do not have big tannins and are monstrously good and complex, so it’s by no means a black and white issue.

But to achieve our goals, we start with site. I look for windier, more exposed sites. Soils that have more limited moisture retention capability. We expose fruit to the sun, which increases the quanity of tannins in the fruit (along with some other changes).
In Oregon, being northerly at the 45th parallel, the plants get a strong message of winter’s approach due to the shortening length of daylight hours and stems harden off well up here regardless of heat or lack thereof at Harvest. So I use a bunch of stems.

At fermentation, we generally have cooler ferment temps and I believe that if you want to avoid clunky tannins, then don’t use enzymes, longer and cooler is better, and a post-fermentation maceration period is useful. Long and slow…

Punchdowns, I’ve heard them worried about for over extraction but don’t really agree. Maybe in a destemmed ferment, but in a 100% stem ferment you’re lucky if you can punch it at all for the first 7-8 days and even after that it’s just physically harder.
We do pumpover in the am (to get air into the juice), and pigeage at night for a week. Then 2 punchdowns a day, maybe 3 during the peak of ferment, and cut to one as the fuice gets to 0 Brix. We’re in fermenter for 30-50 days. Tannins are usually pretty well set by then, but we do use some new 500L puncheons which usually has a bit of tannin, those vary by vineyard though.

In barrel, I almost never fine. It always seems to remove “life” from the wines. Even if fining cleans up what I want it to in the wines it usually takes something good too. I’d prefer just to wait longer.

We do a full 18-20 months of barrel age which helps, IMO, to refine the tannins before bottling.

Off th cuff, so my apologies for typos.

17 Likes

Happy 85th Birthday to your father!

1 Like

Very cool. I appreciate you taking the time to spell all of this out. Thank you.

1 Like

Ha was just eyeing the Ramato! On deck!

1 Like

Guess I’ll open Long Acre tonight to get another data point. Will report back!

2 Likes

Well, sorta had two jobs including the retirement gig.

We butchered a couple of cows (ie, not steers) and a bull when job one was no longer possible. Just part of the routine, as you know.

-Al

2 Likes