From that article: “’‘We’ve been using sodium dioxide in moderate amounts for hundreds of years,’’ he said, referring to the most widely used sulfiting agent.”
Thank you, Mr. Fleming. Clearly I have a faulty recall (or heard a tarted-up version of the story) of the case of Daniel Tsevat.
Of course, it is worth noting that the wine that apparently triggered his asthma was white…and a German white to boot - typically the among the most sulfured of all wines.
What seems to further complicate the subject of organic wine is the subject of sulfites. Sulfite or sulfur dioxide is used as a preservative in wines. It has strong antimicrobial properties and some antioxidant properties. The health effects or consequences of sulfites are debatable though a small percent of the population does suffer a sensitivity reaction to them. A wine can make the claim,“Sulfite Free” or “ No Added Sulfites - Contains Naturally Occurring Sulfites”, but if sulfites are added and the total sulfites in the wine are above 10 parts per million, it must make the statement, “Contains Sulfites.” A wine that makes the claim Sulfite Free must have no detectable sulfites. There is some controversy about whether it is really possible for a wine to have no sulfites, but no detectable sulfites means that current ATF analysis is not sensitive enough to detect the presence of sulfites at such low levels. No Added Sulfites means that the winery did not add sulfites to the wine but there may be naturally occurring sulfites in the wine that occur as a byproduct of fermentation.
According to the NOP labeling laws. Any of the NOP categories could claim to be Sulfite Free or have No Added Sulfites, but the 100% Organic and Organic categories must meet one of these criteria. The Made with Organic Ingredients and Some Organic Ingredients categories may or may not have added sulfites."
I don’t either. I have had several problems in the past with Italian wines that had too little SO2 added (oxidation or Brett) due to the general trend towards lower SO2 levels. I think one problem in customer perception of this issue is that many customers don’t understand clearly why the winery adds a little SO2 in the first place.
Agreed. It definitely is the full range of customer, as you say, and even some ITB that have a “natural” chip on their shoulder. It’s as if they think all winemakers that don’t fit “their” program are out there in the vineyards in a full body suit, spraying whatever they want!
Yes. There is a strong connection between the ‘natural’ camp and low-SO2, but not absolute, fortunately. I recently asked one of Italy’s very rare biodynamic producers if he used SO2 and he said ‘I’m biodynamic, not crazy.’
Piedmont
Cascina degli Ulivi
Cascina Corte (some biodynamic practices)
Ël Mat di Gaiero Giuseppe
Hilberg-Pasquero
Teobaldo Cappellano
Nuova Cappellata
Scagiola (bio-d techniques)
Trinchero
Tuscany
Castello di Argiano
Fattoria di Bacchereto
La Busattina
Caiarossa
Casale
Fattoria Castellina
Casina di Cornia
Duemani
Tenuta di Ghizzano
Corte Pavone (some biodynamic practices)
Cosimo Maria Masini
Fattoria Cerreto Libri
Massavecchia
Il Paradiso di Manfredi
Monte Bernardi
Querciabella(some biodynamic practices)
Castello dei Rampolla
Riecine(experimenting)
San Giuseppe
Stella di Campalto
Fattoria La Torre
Poggio Trevvalle
Tenuta di Valgiano
Umbria
Paolo Bea
Emilia Romagna
La Collina SCRL
Cà Colombera - Dimola
Folicello
Paolo Francesconi
Camillo Donati
Abruzzi
Antonio Di Battista
Emidio Pepe (as of 2005 vintage)
Olearia Vinicola Orsogna
If one was to accept all the names on that list, it would still be a tiny fraction of the number of producers in Italy, which was my point. As far as the list goes, I suspect that the definition of ‘biodynamic’ used there is a bit loose; one of the producers for example says ‘We use prevalently biological fertilizers,’ which on the face of it would mean they aren’t biodynamic.
Yes, that is true. Yet, we attended two different Natural / Bio / Sustainable wine fairs outside of VinItaly this year and there were scores and scores of them. Some of our favorites were from Sardegna which is not even represented on that list.
Well, yes, but ‘natural’ and ‘sustainable’ mean whatever you want them to mean. Those two fairs were interesting, everything from great producers like Foradori to wine that looked and smelled like a veterinary sample.
Unfortunately, as an importer, the question of stability is crucial. I am not sure if some of the most ‘interesting’ wines at those natural fairs would make it over here in one piece. I love artisanal wine, but there is a limit.
As cutting as my earlier remark may have seemed, I actually like and admire many of the methods and aims of those kinds of producers. When they make it here in one piece, I often admire the results, though they never seem to travel well. Unfortunately, from a business perspective, wines that vary as widely as they can and fail as regularly as they do…
The use of SO2 is, from a historical perspective, what gave us wine that would last for more than a year back then they began treating casks with it centuries ago.
Thank you all for answering my question, no, I have no “natural chip” on my shoulder, and sulfites concern me somewhat less than the day the sun burns out. It’s nice to know what “a sulfite” is, it further enables one to sort through all the slick marketing which has now taken over the wine industry. Thank you, knew the “Beserkers” would set the story straight.