Never met the man. The comment to Rovani always struck me as something that was most likely intended to really piss of someone who had been lambasting him for years more than a sincere belief.
His wines have been some of my great burgundy experiences. I remember an other wordly puligny caillerets and the reds from the late eighties and early nineties are special. I have a '76 volnay 1er cru that I’ve been planning to open with a buddy that I’m incredibly excited about.
Etienna and Alix are, by all accounts, wonderful people. I feel for them. Comments expressing happiness at anyone’s death strike me as tacky.
yeah I don’t think so. I think being satisfied over one of the deadliest terrorist attacks on American soil is far more insulting/tacky than people refusing to celebrate his life after his death because of said comments.
Yes, great wines that were unique - low alcohol, dry and everlasting. Will definitely have one to toast to the man. Not sure of his exact comments at the meal he was at with Parker but if I am correct they were insensitive but true.
^the comments that people are referring to are de montille telling Pierre Rovani that he was content after 9-11. There is a long history that precedes it and another back-and-forth after it, but that comment, which he undoubtedly made, is what I think people in this thewad are referring to.
A
my first reaction as well, I’ll give Mike the benefit of the doubt for now as he did say “dinner with parker” so maybe he doesn’t know what everyone else is talking about.