Happy birthday again!
I was searching for a 450 word plus tasting notes, but I will forgive mr. ITB this time. WRT bubbles, and here is a picture of them side by side
The Pierre Paillard '02 and the NV Tarlant (99 based, with 98-97-96, sorry Brian, I’d deduct five points from you ) were both on the butter/yeast and oak notes. It is not a secret (not anymore for sure), that I have a bias towards the Pierre Paillard and I few of their vintage wines. The Pommery '02 was more on the dry side, and not with many yeast/butter notes. Much more on the floral and citrus notes, I would say. While some people noted that they preferred the 2002 Pommery Champagne Cuvée Louise I will note that b the level of the bottle, the Pierre Paillard was running faster. The 2004 Moët & Chandon Grand Vintage Brut Rosé was a classic rose not only on the color but also on the nose and palate, with more nectar/apricot and salamon pale color. Somewhat darker than I initially recalled. I had a feeling this one would work well, hence I was pleased to pull the bottle for a good party. The 2011 Ulysse Collin Champagne Les Maillons (indeed decanted) was a great surprise, with great potential (more than I initially estimated). I am probably going to get few more of that one. It shows both aging potential and getting better in the glass. I tasted more ‘open’/‘floral’ after some good time in the decanter, and I heard it drank very well the following day (the leftover).
As for the black cats- who greeted us on arrival, here are my CT notes—
2000 EMH Cabernet Sauvignon Black Cat (8/28/2016)
First time, and most likely the last time I ever get to taste the '00 EMH; A real treat from ~2 hours opened up, but it needed some time to ‘stretch’ after being in bottle for so many years. The taste was consistent with the 2001 EMH, but certainly was somewhat more mature. It had more of the earthy/secondary tastes and it was not loaded with oak. By the vote of the glass, I think I took 2-3 refills of the 2000 and the 2009 SS, hence my vote regarding the status of the bottle. Dark red/brick, very close to the color of the '01, long nice finish, great match to the dinner’s menu. It kept an evolved nose throughout the meal, and remain quiet consistent in its secondary tastes (spices, a bit tabacco), and the floral nose good balance. Wish I could drink more of this. If you happen to have one in your cellar in good storage, it is time to drink it. It is ready, and it is rewarding.
I think it well earned the 95 or even 95+ It was also a once in a lifetime (most likely) special opportunity to taste this one. We all enjoyed (95 pts.)
2001 EMH Cabernet Sauvignon Black Cat(8/28/2016)
Drank it along side the 2000 EMH, 2002 EMH, '09 SS EMH, and '14 Sparkles EMH. All decanted for about 2 hours but also decanted into the evening.
Consistent with the tasting in Sep-15. I would note that color wise, it seemed more ‘mature’ (more brick). On the nose, it was consistent with last year (spices and black fruit), but there was something slightly different (one taster suggested very early TCA?) but other tasters have not agreed. IThe verdict was to set the bottle aside for at least one hour. That hour did the difference needed and got it to be closer to ‘as advertised’. It brought in the consistent black fruit variety, and EMH taste. It was more consistent taste wise with EMH 2000 than 2002 (the latter was a new barrel, while '00 and '01 were not).
It kept evolving during the ~3 hours revisited. The finish got longer. I would say it had a hard competition with the 2000 and '09 SS. A truly enjoyable treat to taste it the second time. imho, it does not seem to go ‘down’ yet, but certainly worth drinking now. The rest of my notes remain mostly consistent with Sep-15 notes
My vote was putting it close to the '00 and '09SS but perhaps a bottle variation from the previous tasting (where I ranked it at ~95)
2002 EMH Cabernet Sauvignon Black Cat (8/28/2016)
I think the previous notes (even with time differences between them) caught a core difference between the '02 EMH and other vintages of EMH. This one has more oak- new barrel for this vintage (later vintages have lower levels of new oak, if I recall correctly) . It does represent now a good mature ‘emh black cat’ wine with the hints smoky, tabacco, leather noted by previous tasters. Rich in fruit and floral on the palate. Nice finish (not as long as the '01 and '00). More berries/currant on the palate, I think. I found it very enjoyable, but it needed time in the decanter to ‘balance’ the oak (that was more dominant on PnP). First time I tasted the '02. I would probably decant it for at least 3 hours if I were to open it again. It was also a great example of the influence of new/neutral oak on the development of the cabs over time.
I think the current ‘scores’ given so far (92-93 range at the time this note is written) reflect well, but the key would be one’s preference for new oak vs. neutral
2009 EMH Cabernet Sauvignon Black Cat 10th Anniversary Special Selection (8/28/2016)
Opened alongside the 2000-2001-2002 and '14 Sparkles. The tasters seem to be in agreement that it may be the currently best performing EMH bottle, though the '00 and '01 did not fall behind (I would say the 2000 and 2009 changed ‘spots’ during the evening few times). On the nose, very much in line with ‘black cat’ signature, though the floral on the 2000 was very impressive. It did show additional secondary tastings since last year, but keep providing a good representation of its aging potential, spices. I did not recognize the small vanilla tastes as much this time . With the lamb, it certainly opened the spice/earthy notes much more. By the vote of glasses refills (mine included)- in very strong position.
To summarize- still one of the best from EMH, if not the best. I must be somewhat in ‘good luck’/‘timing’ to be in the right place to taste this one four times in three years. Special wine for special occasions.
(Because I scored it few times in the past, I would not add another score.)
Sparkles 2014 EMH- Showing the potential of becoming one of the best EMH production, but it is very very young now. 3 months in the bottle, if I recall correctly. It is very fruit front right now, but already enjoyable wine. I think Brian in less than 450 did get the foundations of this one below.
Needless to say, it was a very enjoyable dinner. Great crabs to start, great salad, nice cheeses and peppers with the champagnes. Thank you again for the opportunity to taste some of the older vintages side by side
postscript- I did a pre-barrel tasting of EMH '16… very promising!