TNs: 2009 Sancerres Blindtasted

2009 SANCERRES BLINDTASTED - Tom’s House, Palo Alto, California (3/31/2011)


I have to admit to being pretty bored with Sauvignon Blanc in recent years. It’s easy to grow and has become ubiquitous, so perfectly decent versions of it are available from everywhere: California, Washington, Chile, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Italy and, of course, France. Most of the oceans of Sauvignon Blanc taste pretty much the same, though–grapefruit, lime, tart citrus, maybe some tart gooseberry, in a word: predictable. And most of it is not particularly subtle. Hence, I tend to avoid it. Sure, New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc is often distinctive for its gooseberry and “cat pee” nose, but why the heck would I want to smell cat pee in my wine? It’s bad enough I have to clean out the litter box once a week.

Another problem I have with Sauv Blanc is that it is not particularly ageworthy. Even the great, concentrated Pouilly Fumés from Didier Dagueneau tended to be delicious only for two to three years and then to go markedly downhill. Even those that last three or more years don’t develop any interesting secondary characteristics with the additional age. And, sure, Sancerre is the perfect pairing with goat cheese, but how often do I eat goat cheese? So when the organizer of my regular blindtasting group planned a Sancerre tasting, I at first thought, “Here’s some more Sauvignon Blanc I can avoid.” This was Sancerre though–one of the few places where, grown on limestone soils and predominantly south-facing slopes, Sauvignon Blanc can show some terroir-driven minerality and complexity, as well as subtlety not often found in Sauv Blanc from everywhere else. So I went to taste nine new releases of Sancerre, and I’m glad I did. They restored my faith in Sauvignon Blanc when grown in the right places, by thoughtful producers.

2009 was a pretty fabulous vintage throughout France, especially in Burgundy and Bordeaux. It was excellent in the Loire too, although parts of Sancerre were hard hit by hail. April and May were quite warm, June and July were average, while August got quite hot, leading to hydric stress in some areas. Harvest started September 21 and extended to October 3. Yields were on the low side, but fruit concentration levels were reportedly the highest since 1947. Malic acid levels were low.

Sancerre, by the way, has not always been Sauvignon Blanc country. Up until the mid-20th century, it was planted mainly to red grapes, especially Pinot Noir, and to Chasselas table grapes. Once Sauvignon Blanc from Sancerre took off in popularity from the late 1970s and early 1980s, the amount of Sauvignon Blanc grown there soared.

In this tasting, everything was blind. We started with a couple of whites, one of which seemed like it had to be a New Zealand Sauv Blanc, and the other of which probably a Chenin Blanc. The first one, though, turned out to be an '07 Sancerre. We then tasted nine 2009 Sancerres, including two from the great Les Monts Damnés Vineyard. We finished with a blind red that seemed likely to most of us to be a very good Burgundy, but which turned out to be Pinot Noir from Sancerre instead. For the details on the wines, producers and the group’s and my rankings, see below.
Starter blind wines

  • 2007 Patient Cottat Sancerre Vieilles Vignes - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Light yellow color; cat pee, tart gooseberry nose; tight, tart grapefruit, tart gooseberry palate with less than medium acidity; medium finish 88+ points (tasted blind, I wrongly guessed from the nose and palate profile that it was a NZ Sauv Blanc) (88 pts.)
  • 2008 Domaine des Aubuisières Vouvray Cuvée de Silex - France, Loire Valley, Touraine, Vouvray
    Light yellow color; mature, ripe apple, mineral, tart green fruit nose; ripe apple, gooseberry, ripe lime, mineral palate; medium-plus finish (89 pts.)

Group scoring and my TNs

All the wines in this flight were good wines, with even my lowest ranked wine (and the group’s), the Pascal Cotat Les Monts Damnés, meriting at least 88+ points. Nearly all had the minerality, complexity and subtlety I rarely find in Sauv Blanc grown elsewhere. Our first place Sancerre (my fourth place) was the Claude Riffault “Les Boucauds.” The Domaine, now run by Claude’s son Stéphane, owns 33 plots on steep hills in four villages. Most are on limestone soils, but some are on flint soils. The plots are vinified separately and then assembled to make three different cuvées. The Les Boucauds we had in this tasting was harvested exclusively from limestone soils, with 30- to 40-year-old vines. It’s fermented in steel tanks. It had good minerality, acidity and poise, and can be found locally for a very reasonable $22.

My favorite was the elegant Thomas-Labaille Chavignol Les Monts Damnés, with its floaty nose and minerally, concentrated palate. It’s a Louis Dressner wine. Jean-Paul Labaille has taken over as winemaker from his father-in-law, Claude Thomas. They have excellent sites, including Les Monts Damnés, thought to be Sancerre’s greatest vineyard, and they use essentially neutral, two- and three-year-old barrels for fermentation, as well as concrete vats and stainless steel. This wine is also available for about $22, which is a steal for a wine this good and minerally.

The Sylvain Bailly Terroirs was both the group’s, and my, second place wine. It’s one of three Sancerre cuvees this producer makes. It comes from limestone soils and is aged on its lees before racking. The local price on this wine is only $20.

I didn’t rate the group’s third place, Vincent Gaudry L’Esprit Rudolf, as high as the group. It was only eighth for me, but still merited 89+ points. This domaine, which owns seven hectares planted to Sauvignon Blanc, has recently been certified as biodynamic. The L’Esprit Rudolf is one of four Sancerre cuvees they make, and it sees a year of barrel aging.

The group’s fourth place (my fifth) was Domaine Hippolyte Reverdy. This is a Kermit Lynch wine, and had a distinctly smoky nose, as well as good minerality and cut. Michel Reverdy has been in charge since his father’s untimely death (and his brother’s suicide, out of grief over their father’s death). The domaine has 11 hectares of Sauvignon Blanc, the vines average 30 years old, and they produce two cuvées.

The group’s fifth place was my third, and I think it’s quite a good value for about $17. It’s the Etienne Daulny, and it has good density and minerality. The domaine owns 15 hectares divided among 50 different plots. This regular bottling is a blend of different plots, with different soil types. It is fermented and aged in steel tanks, with no malolactic fermentation. Daulny also makes a single vineyard bottling, called Clos de Chaudenay.

The group’s and my sixth place was the Pascal & Nicolas Reverdy Cuvée Les Coûtes. Pascal and Nicolas took over the domaine from their father, but Nicolas died in 2007 as a result of an accident when the two brothers were cutting down a tree. The domaine currently owns 14 hectares, 11 of which are planted to Sauvignon Blanc, with vines averaging over 25 years old. They produce four white Sancerre cuvées, of which ours, Les Coûtes, is from a single hillside vineyard with vines averaging about 50 years old.

The group’s eighth place wine, my seventh, was the Château de Thauvenay. This is one of the older Sancerre producers, currently owned by the sixth generation Count and Countess Georges de Choulot. They have 14.5 hectares of Sauvignon Blanc vines averaging around 25 years old, on both chalk and clay soils.

Our last place wine in this tasting was intense and very odd and high pitched on the nose. It was more like a heavy Sauv Blanc from everywhere else than a subtle Sancerre to me. It is from the great vineyard, Les Monts Damnés, from a 1.5 hectare parcel with 35-year-old vines, and the producer is Domaine Pascal Cotat. This domaine picks later than other producers, which may be why this wine, from a very ripe year, was so much more intense and unsubtle than the others in the lineup. Some years their wines have so much residual sugar and/or high alcohol levels that they can’t be sold as Sancerre under the appellation’s restrictions. They ferment in very old demi-muids.

  • 2009 Claude Riffault Sancerre Les Boucauds - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #1 (my #4) – 24 pts; 3 firsts, 1 second, 2 thirds, 0 last places – very light yellow color; nice tart grapefruit, mineral, tart citrus nose; poised, tart citrus, tart grapefruit, mineral palate with medium acidity; medium finish 91+ points (91 pts.)
  • 2009 Sylvain Bailly Sancerre Terroirs - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #2 (my #2) – 26 pts.; 3, 4, 0, 1 - light yellow color; ripe grapefruit, green grape, fresh, very tart green apple nose; crystalline, very tart apple, ripe grapefruit, mineral palate; medium finish 92+ points (a great value at about $20) (92 pts.)
  • 2009 Vincent Gaudry Sancerre L’Esprit Rudolf - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #3 (my #8) – 40 pts.; 1, 1, 3, 0 - light lemon yellow color; tart yellow apple, mineral, peach, saline nose; tart peach, grapefruit, mineral palate with low notes; medium finish 89+ points (89 pts.)
  • 2009 Domaine Hippolyte Reverdy Sancerre - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #4 (my #5) – 40 pts.; 0, 0, 1, 0 - light yellow color; focused grapefruit, mineral, smoky nose; focused, tart grapefruit, mineral palate with cut; medium-plus finish (91 pts.)
  • 2009 Domaine Etienne Daulny Sancerre - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #5 (my #3) – 44 pts.; 1, 0, 2, 1 - light lemon yellow color; intense wet wool, tart citrus, lime rind nose; tart grapefruit, mineral palate with density and medium-plus acidity; medium-plus finish (terrific value for about $17) (92 pts.)
  • 2009 Pascal & Nicolas Reverdy Sancerre Cuvée Les Coûtes - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #6 (my #6) – 45 pts.; 0, 2, 0, 0 - light yellow color; ripe citrus, tart peach, lime nose; tart, concentrated grapefruit, ripe grapefruit palate, needs a year or so; medium finish 90+ points (90 pts.)
  • 2009 Thomas-Labaille Sancerre Chavignol Les Monts Damnés - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #7 (my #1) – 50 pts.; 1, 1, 1, 0 - bright, light lemon yellow color; light, floaty, lemon, grapefruit nose; tart pear, ripe grapefruit, lemon, mineral palate with good concentration; medium-plus finish (93 pts.)
  • 2009 Château de Thauvenay Sancerre - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #8 (my #7) – 58 pts.; 0, 0, 0, 0 - light lemon yellow color; seawater, saline, oyster shell, minerally nose; saline, tart grapefruit, tart kumquat, mineral, lavender palate; medium finish ($14.50 at Costco) (90 pts.)
  • 2009 Domaine Pascal Cotat (Pascal & Francis) Sancerre Les Monts Damnés - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre
    Group’s #9 (my #9) – 76 pts.; 0, 0, 0, 6 - light yellow color; odd, very high pitched, grapefruit pulp, tart lime, minerally nose; intense, tart grapefruit, very tart gooseberry, mineral palate; medium-plus finish 88+ points (88 pts.)

Final blind wine

This was a great wine to end with, reminding one that great, minerally Pinots with good acidity come from elsewhere in France besides Burgundy. It was from an excellent Sancerre producer, Lucien Crochet, and I’m only sorry we didn’t get to taste one of their white Sancerres in our lineup as well.

  • 2006 Lucien Crochet Sancerre Rouge La Croix du Roy - France, Loire Valley, Upper Loire, Sancerre Rouge
    Medium cherry red color with pale meniscus; lovely, tart red fruit, tart cherry skin, rosehips nose with a touch of brett; tasty, poised, tart cherry, mineral, cranberry palate, very Burgundian; medium-plus finish (91 pts.)

Great writeup. I feel the same as you do about Sauv Blanc – it’s easy to find perfectly good ones at fair prices, but other than Dagueneau, I have a hard time getting excited about any of them.

It is a smart order off a restaurant list when you’re having seafood and don’t want to spend a lot – $30 for a major label New Zealand SB or something, just so long as you’re getting a very young one (it doesn’t take long for those to go downhill, even a 9+ months from release).

By the way, Lucien Crochet also makes a very nice Sancerre rose, I believe from pinot noir, which sells for around $20-25.

Thanks Richard. This was an interesting tasting. I understand the problem with many indifferent Sauvignon Blancs. I do, however, enjoy good examples as a house wine, especially at high altitude. Maybe there is something about lack of oxygen. At any rate, various vintages of the Domaine Hippolyte Reverdy Sancerre have been my mountain house pour for years, while lately the Lucien Crochet mostly the white, with the occasional bottle of red, is standing in while I’m having a sourcing problem. I do think that Dageuneau’s wines are on a totally different level, and I do think they age. While I wouldn’t say that my 05 Buisson Renard is necessarily better than it was on release, I would say with age it’s differently delicious. However, above and beyond that I’m curious that no one has mentioned the Vatan Clos de Neore, which transforms itself with age, although probably not to the extent that chardonnay is capable of. I had an 02 last year, my last one, and yes it does develop secondary characteristic, and yes it was worth waiting for. What happens after a couple of decades or more, I can’t speak to, but maybe there is someone out there who can.

Thank you for the great report Richard, even though I disagree with some of what you say. The main thing I seem to get out of this is, what the hell is with Sauvignon Blanc producers from the Loire and having untimely deaths? Dagueneau and Reverdy?

Perhaps if you cleaned out the cat box more than once a week, the cat pee smell wouldn’t be so pungent! [snort.gif]

Nice notes. I really like the 09 H. Reverdy Sancerre; good with food, and not so sharp/acidic that wine newbies can’t enjoy it.

Bruce

Diane,
That’s some nice house wine you’ve got there.
Thanks for mentioning the Vatan. I’ve actually never tried one; I never see it in these parts. It’s awfully pricey Sancerre ($50-$60+), so I’m glad to hear it has ageability going for it as well. I’m going to track some down and try it.
Warm regards,
Richard

Richard,
If ever you find yourself in Telluride, you’ll have to come over and raise some glasses. I think you will find the Vatan Clos la Neore fascinating. I especially like 02, 06, and 08. The later vintage I think his daughter made with his supervision. Interestingly enough, it reminds me a great deal of the 02. Look forward to hearing what you think about it. Have a stash of that in Tride too!
Cheers,
Diane

Diane,
Thank you for the lovely invite. I’d love to raise a glass with you sometime. And thanks for the vintage recommendations as well. I see the '08 down in L.A. I’ll see if I can track some older ones down too.
–Richard

Vatan is sui generis. It is Chavignol first, Vatan second, and sauvignon a distant third.

I think it is much better than Dagenneau, for less money.

The 2009 reminds me a lot of the 2005, a very rich year for Vatan. The 2002, along with the 1996, are two of the 5 best sauvignon I’ve ever had.

Yes Edmond Vatan finally retired after many false starts and his daughter Anne [the wife of Nady Foucault of Chateau Rougeard] made the 2008 - although as you suggest it is difficult to think of her father being completely absent from the process.
The Clos la Neore is a great wine but IMO there are other great Sancerre SBs – those of the Cotat cousins, Thomas-Labaille, Vacheron and some of the many Henri Bourgeois cuvees to name but 4 and of course, across the river Didier Dagueneau’s several Pouilly Fumes.

All these wines age well although my personal preference is to finish my cases [as with my favourite Cru Beaujolais and Muscadets] within 10 years. I have had and enjoyed much older versions of all these wines but 10 years is about as long as any of these last in my cellar.

I had the 2007 Dagueneau Buisson Renard [his last vintage] at RSJ Restaurant near Waterloo, London earlier this week and enjoyed it enormously as usual as with all his SB wines from the basic to the Silex.

We are in the Loire every year in July based at one of our favourite hotel/restaurants at Onzain for 1-2 weeks and always visit Sancerre and Pouilly for a day. Chavignol has a decent hotel with a good brasserie and better restaurant where one of the Bourgeois clan is the chef/proprietor – great for lunch between producer visits.

Nady helped with the 2007 as well. I had it with he and Anne in Saumur.

Thanks, Nathan and Nigel for the added insights. I think I’m going to have to open a bottle of 08 or 06 Vatan Clos la Neore this week!

Great writeup, thank you so much! I went long on the Thauvenay at Costco for $14, alas all gone now. Hippolyte Reverdy is a consistent favorite. Love the 09s!

2006 is a looser vintage, so I’d drink that one first. The 2008 can age for a bit, if that’s your thing. I prefer it to the 2006, but they both express Vatan-ness.

@nathan. i’ve had a different experience. for me, the 06 just keeps getting better and better, except for my corked bottle a couple of months ago. i was in denial then and am still in mourning now. must admit, though, i’ve gone through 10 out 12 bottles from my case. it was just too good to keep my hands off, sadly.

I think it is a vintage to drink younger than I would really top vintages, and your inability to keep your hands off it is proof enough. Vatan is interesting in every vintage, like any great terroir.

Point well taken. Opening an 08 tonight, which indeed is my preference of the 2 vintages. Just want to see where it’s at.

Tangentially, I had 2009 Cotat Monts Damnes last night and it really took a while to open.

I didn’t buy any 2008 Vatan to cellar, it has just become too expensive (~$60), but there is a local restaurant where I can drink it when I get the itch.

Funny. I used to really like the Cotat Monts Damnes but lately have found it sort of strange and gave up on it. Have not had the 09. Got a bottle of the Labaille Mont Damnes after reading the blind tasting notes. Looking forward to trying it; new to me. On the Vatan front, I figure finding white burg I like @ $60 would be a good deal, so I’m willing to fork over the change for the Vatan. After I went through all of EMPs 2002 Vatan a couple of years ago (someone had to do it), I haven’t seen the wine on restaurant lists very much. Lucky you.

I am very grateful to you for this fantastic report, Richard, and glad you decided to go through with the tasting. I have been wondering about the 2009 vintage and your notes on Reverdy are encouraging, as it’s one of the few we do see here on occasion.

Les Monts Damnés is my favourite vineyard, at least that I’ve had thus far. Yet the note on the Pascal Cotat is really interesting—I have unequivocally loved everything he and Francois have made from the vineyard in the past. Just got finished a 2007 Francois Cotat that was wonderful. I have heard from some that they have a distinct quality preference for Francois’ wines. You make me curious enough to maybe source a bottle from each…if I ever get somewhere to find them.

I have, unfortunately, not yet had the pleasure of trying a Labaille wine. I think that will have to change. Thanks yet again for providing these sterling notes. I need to try a Vatan someday too.

My notes on the 07 Francois Cotat…

2007 Francois Cotat Sancerres Les Monts Damnes

Addicted to this stuff. How can you not be? a little flint or shale this time to go with the lemon and flowered water bouquet. In the mouth, again splendidly clean as a whistle with lemon balm, apple and unripe pear. It’s the elegant vibrancy of these wines that set them apart for me